Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
  Photos

Shades of Easter

longbrosdmk41

What do you think of this post?
LOL (5) WTF (0) Hot (5) More Please (28)
By:           editor editor
On:           Mar 25, 2009
Tagged: , , , ,
23 Comments

No. 1 · ggreen · Member · 579 comments

Shaved bunnies with what looks like Eva Gabor wigs on, modeling women’s underwear.

Posted: Mar 25, 2009 at 1:56 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 2 · daniel k

hee hee

Posted: Mar 25, 2009 at 2:15 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 3 · John (yet another John)

I love Easter and little baby chicks!

Posted: Mar 25, 2009 at 2:26 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 4 · hardmannyc · Member · 1071 comments

They’re about as sexy as the Olsen Twins.

Posted: Mar 25, 2009 at 2:31 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 5 · Mark M.

The baby blue thong looks stuffed w/ tissue to me…

Posted: Mar 25, 2009 at 2:41 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 6 · Erick

How can that much skin be so un sexy?

Posted: Mar 25, 2009 at 2:57 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 7 · eric

maybe its my underwear fetish, but the twin in the purple thong sporting that big cock is super hot.

Posted: Mar 25, 2009 at 3:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 8 · allstarecho · Member · 186 comments

It is soooo time for my next threesome.

Posted: Mar 25, 2009 at 3:51 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 9 · rogue dandelion · Member · 353 comments

their is something very plastic and disturbing about this photoshoot.
I usually don’t mind young guys of the zac efron variety, but these two look like they were capture in an eastern european village and efronified against their will. their eyes are so empty and poses so awkward.

Posted: Mar 25, 2009 at 4:30 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 10 · dvlaries · Member · 987 comments

Why did I even click through the five pages? It’s not as if I don’t know better by now… :|

Posted: Mar 25, 2009 at 4:42 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 11 · Tallskin · Member · 534 comments

Eeeee, the Midwich Cuckoos have grown up and are now modelling.

They’re plastic but also cute in a sort of robotic manner.

Posted: Mar 25, 2009 at 4:45 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 12 · EdWoody

Cute boys, but all five pictures were the same.

Posted: Mar 25, 2009 at 9:58 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 13 · Gurlene

Be nice and DON’T tell them that is NOT gold that falls from back there. Their ego’s simply could not withstand that shocking truth.

A few years back I read an article about Russian army officers forcing new scrips into gay porn. They would get the cute ones who clearly were not cut out for military service and “persuade” them to go into that ‘career’.

Many of them took the offer and these two make me wonder if military officers in other eastern block countries jumped on the bandwagon.

Posted: Mar 26, 2009 at 7:51 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 14 · Nate

maybe they should have used less gym socks in the undies.

Posted: Mar 26, 2009 at 8:45 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 15 · Z reveals

They look underage and girly

Posted: Mar 26, 2009 at 3:15 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 16 · cruiser

What, are we resorting to borderline kiddie porn?! These two barely look old enough to be able to walk to school by themselves much less anything of this nature(or beyond). How old are they anyway…12? If you are going to use young(er)guys at least make suretheir ID’s are real. What schoolyard did you find these two(gives a whole new definition to the term)twinkies?

Posted: Mar 26, 2009 at 3:21 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 17 · mylilpip

this is hilarious. i love how the twin in the purple was obviously asked to put his “basket” on top of the bench.

Posted: Mar 26, 2009 at 8:25 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 18 · osocubano

Why bother repeating the same picture five times?
Once was too much.

Posted: Mar 27, 2009 at 7:18 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 19 · Eric

Hmmm…does someone have an Altar Boy fetish? Geez….

Posted: Mar 27, 2009 at 10:46 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 20 · J.T.

It’s staged, isn’t it? It’s the same boy (I use the term loosely) photoshopped. Five photographs, each with at least five feet between the two. Even the super-straight Karshners touch each other! Very odd.

Posted: Jun 2, 2010 at 12:23 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 21 · Kyler

When I saw the photo I thought it was Justin bieber with the horrible Donald trump hair

Posted: Jun 17, 2010 at 7:21 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 22 · Hisboyfriendshot

I actually like more masculine men who are ruff and rugged looking – but seriously guys??? The comments about them looking 12 – whatever no twelve year old has that much muscle tone or is that tall. So they aren’t macho very masculine men – they are still very handsome in their youthful way. Why there are five pictures of exactly the same poses almost is another matter?

Posted: Jun 17, 2010 at 3:41 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 23 · Rick

There is no such person as Austyn. Both guys are Ashtyn. Everyone who knows Ashtyn knows that he doesn’t have a twin brother named Austyn.

Posted: Sep 27, 2011 at 2:49 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]

Add your Comment




It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



POPULAR ON QUEERTY

Copyright 2012 Queerty, Inc.
Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.