Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
Back to the post

UPDATE: The 16 States (& 1 District) Where You Can Get Married Now

GayWedding


Back to the post
  • 17 Comments
    • Dakotahgeo
      Dakotahgeo

      Wow! Nine states with three in the wings to allow. You do realize, of course, that when the “magic” number of 15 (approx.) states is reached, there will never be an amendment to the Constitution to ban same sex marriage nationwide, because it takes 2/3 of the states to ratify an amendment and that would mean 35 (approx.) states must vote to amend. I seriously doubt that will happen at this point. Congratulations on this remarkable milestone!
      Dakotahgeo, M.Div. Pastor/Chaplain

      Apr 26, 2013 at 2:32 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Homophile
      Homophile

      The way that equality has been snowballing has been unreal. I never thought I’d see marriage equality in my lifetime. Maybe domestic partnerships recognized on a federal level is the most I’d hoped for.

      This was all made possible by the (at the time) fringe gay activists that wouldn’t listen to the HRC, it’s because of people being brave enough to be out and proud, it’s because of young people and their realization that it’s no big deal. Mostly it’s because of our straight allies who recognize right from wrong, and in spite of the fact that it doesn’t effect them directly, they still are fighting with us for change.

      Kumbaya.

      Apr 26, 2013 at 2:55 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Dakotahgeo
      Dakotahgeo

      @Dakotahgeo: Actually, there are four states in the wings…
      Rhode Island, Delaware, Illinois and Minnesota. That would be 13, 2 more to go to defeat the 2/3 clause to amend the Constitution. I believe DOMA is bound to fall, and California will be another gift in our favor. Hmmm… happy, happy, joy, joy!

      Apr 26, 2013 at 3:10 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • DarkZephyr
      DarkZephyr

      GOD, I am SO proud to be a Washingtonian. I live in one of the first three states to get marriage equality by popular vote, and the very FIRST state to actually implement it in December of 2013.

      I remember feeling angry, frustrated and saddened when the %^&#ing zealots got enough hateful signatures to force the referendum back in June of 2012. But now I am SO GLAD that they did. We won’t be getting any version of Proposition 8 here, because the people have already spoken. And the MILLIONS that NOM and the AFA and the Mormon Church, etc, poured the campaign against Referendum 74 was a complete waste. Its gone and they will never get it back. HA!

      Apr 26, 2013 at 3:39 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • alterego1980
      alterego1980

      @Dakotahgeo: To be honest, I don’t see Illinois, Hawaii, Delaware, Colorado or New Jersey , all who have Civil Unions at this point, ever voting in favor of an amendment to ban same-sex marriage. That, with Rhode Island puts us at 15 in favor of either Civil Unions or full marriage equality. Let’s hope the snowball grows even bigger over the next few years.

      Apr 26, 2013 at 3:50 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • daniwitz13
      daniwitz13

      Yes, I don’t see why full equality can’t be realized, Two Males should be able to make Children together like the opposite sex. Can’t they just legislate it to happen. How many States did you mention that can make it Happen? Surely that is attainable. Maybe not tomorrow but just maybe a Trillion years from now, maybe. Well it is certainly something to look forward to. Cross your fingers. Pity.

      Apr 26, 2013 at 4:03 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Homophile
      Homophile

      @daniwitz13:

      Old, tired, debunked argument. Move along.

      Apr 26, 2013 at 4:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Dakotahgeo
      Dakotahgeo

      @alterego1980: Thank you, alterego. I was probably thinking wishfully, lolol. Unfortunately, my glass always seems half full, but wouldn’t it be nice if…! But yes, the snowball indeed growth bigger! :-) Kudos!

      Apr 26, 2013 at 4:34 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • DarkZephyr
      DarkZephyr

      @daniwitz13: We are talking about marriage equality, not reproductive equality. Pull your head out of your dark tunnel, if you know what I mean.

      Apr 26, 2013 at 4:44 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Dakotahgeo
      Dakotahgeo

      @DarkZephyr: (Sighhh… with smiles) Thank you, DarkZephyr!!!

      Apr 26, 2013 at 4:48 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Ottoman
      Ottoman

      Just because a state has marriage equality that doesn’t mean its people and/or a future republican legislative majority wouldn’t vote to ratify a federal Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. I think Iowa would be particularly vulnerable still. However, I’m pretty sure that ship sailed 15 plus years ago and there’s no chance more than say 20-25 states would ever get on board with a US Constitutional gay marriage ban now. Bush tried to go that route in 2006 and it didn’t get anywhere in the Republican led Congress.

      Apr 26, 2013 at 4:53 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • tomron
      tomron

      The inevitability of marriage for all is plain to see. If I were any of the “holdout states” I’d hurry to hop in the bandwagon. It’s been proved over and over by the Williams Institute that there are big bucks to be had for states in which marriage can be done. Why are those “other” states allowing those big bucks to escape their boundaries?
      PS: This of course is secondary to the question: Why are those “other states” being so blind to the inequality they foster?

      Apr 26, 2013 at 4:59 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Dakotahgeo
      Dakotahgeo

      @Ottoman: Thank you for your comment. One of the strongest arguments pro Same-sex marriage coming out of the 9th Circuit Court was the fact that once marriage rights are voted on and made law, legally, a state cannot take those rights away, no matter how the Legislature tips, or in what direction (unless, of course, the law is found unconstitutional… in CA’s case, that isn’t going to happen!). That, plus other strong arguments FOR the dismissal of Prop 8 will probably be the legal backbreaker for DOMA and Prop 8 (in CA’s favor, but not other states). Your remarks are spot on the mark!

      Apr 26, 2013 at 5:04 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • bmwblonde
      bmwblonde

      Moron-i-witz (aka danowitz) IS doing the same tired old “arguement.” He starts with a truly STUPID [but un-said] premise (which we’re supposed to fall for), that Marriage is Solely to Make Children. Well maybe that WAS the premise if we were still tribe members (as in, 2,000 years ago), back when women were property (like Camels) and you only “owned” them to create your (male, hope hope hope) heirs.

      THAT is the Evangelical premise (for Patriarchal Catholics, Protestants, Jews and Muslims) — that we can go back to the “good old days” when men were men and women were OWNED.
      THEN, from that asinine “premise,” he assumes that gay men want to be married so they can somehow biologically “have” children. Obviously his tiny little mind is all turned around in its britches about that prospect, which he then relegates to science fiction (“trillions of years from now.”)

      Maybe we can find a time machine and send this cretin back to the Middle East a couple thousand years ago; if he’s lucky he’ll materialize there the Big Tribal Chief that drives his goofy, bigoted “premise” — and not a slave, or god forbid, a woman. (Eek)

      In other words, folks, we must NEVER “accept” or “argue with” such absurd PREMISES. Instead, just source them and CALL THEM OUT. Then they fall apart into the stupidly anachronictic male-chauvinist and homophobic “ideas” that they really are (were).
      “Cray-Cray.”

      Apr 26, 2013 at 5:21 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Merv
      Merv

      A stroll down memory lane. It’s amazing how much changed in just a few months.

      The list should probably also include New Mexico. You can get married there, but just not in every county.

      Dec 18, 2013 at 2:33 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • erikwm
      erikwm

      I live in a state with marriage equality, but can’t even find a date. :(

      Dec 19, 2013 at 1:11 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Anna D. Croom
      Anna D. Croom

      Kayla got a nice year old Mercedes S-Class S63 AMG just by some parttime working online with a macbook… go to this web-site>>> http://bit.do/fxo7

      Dec 19, 2013 at 8:53 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Merv
      Merv

      Wow, my comment from yesterday is already obsolete. You can now get married throughout New Mexico.

      Dec 19, 2013 at 4:16 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • ariniah724
      ariniah724

      my step-mom just bought a stunning blue Chevrolet Equinox SUV only from working parttime off a home computer… over here……. http://tiny.cc/u1zc8w

      Dec 19, 2013 at 4:47 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Kathy T. Williams
      Kathy T. Williams

      like Steven replied I’m amazed that people able to get paid $6571 in a few weeks on the internet. check this link right here now,… http://bit.do/fCKD

      Dec 20, 2013 at 8:12 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • krystalkleer
      krystalkleer

      congrats to ALL those states wake’n up and hopp’n on board the homo train!
      http://getoffmydress.blogspot.com/2013/12/ho-ho-hold-up-minute.html

      Dec 20, 2013 at 1:39 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • aubergine
      aubergine

      Without further “adieu”????? What illiterate moron composed this?

      Dec 20, 2013 at 4:10 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Queerty now requires you to log in to comment

    Please log in to add your comment.

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.

  • MORE PHOTOS

    FOLLOW US
     




    GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.