Queerty is better as a member
Consent is a consistent freely given, clearly stated “yes.”
‘The jury deliberated for 45 minutes. They ruled that Man #2, indeed, could have given consent for the blowjob while suffering a drunken blackout, thus letting Man #1 off the hook.’
Yeah? Or otherwise what would have happened? This story is complete bullshit. Every gay person on the face of this planet should be angry as Hell that someone could actually go on trial for something that stupid in the first fucking place. The Alcohol Induced Amnesia argument? How about the fucking Heterosexual Panic Defense argument? Man #1 is lucky he escaped this homophobe with his life intact. So how about you put Man #2 on trial for speculation that Man #1 was actually in the car with a madman who didn’t confess beforehand to being a potential lunatic spree killer? The audacity of these straight people assuming that any gay man would purposefully put themselves that far in harm’s way.
You can’t rape the willing.
@MacDonald: That idea is new in the last 6 months – frankly. If someone asks for a blowjob – they have consented. Furthermore, NZ laws are different from America’s — just to point that out.
Need an account? Register It's free and easy.
13 Gay Sex Scenes That Went "Too Far" For TV
PHOTOS: Costumed Hunks Get Into La Leche Halloween in New York City
Meet The Adorable Boyfriend Duo That Dresses CFDA Icon Of The Year Rihanna
PHOTOS: Vintage Fashion Ads From The 1980s
PHOTOS: Uptown, Downtown and Upside Down at the New York Boylesque Festival