A recent poll by sugar-daddy-snatching site, SeekingArrangement.com, reveals that over 10,000 of its wealthy American keepers of the kept prefer Mitt Romney over Barack Obama. According to today’s press release:
“While poorer female sugar babies had chosen Obama over Romney by 3 to 1 in an earlier poll, millionaires in America prefer Romney for President,” says Brandon Wade, Founder & CEO of SeekingArrangement.com. “What is significant is that millionaires who support Romney are more willing to contribute money to his campaign than are millionaires who support Obama. Romney will have a significant fund-raising edge with millionaires over Obama in this upcoming election.”
“Millionaires prefer Romney over Obama in almost every major state except for California, New Jersey, North Carolina, and Washington. Even in Democratic strongholds such as Massachusetts, New York and even Illinois, Romney has done extremely well with millionaires,” says Mr. Wade who holds a BS and MBA from MIT. “Top five reasons millionaires prefer Romney are: Dissatisfaction with how Obama has handled the economy; Millionaires feel Romney will be a stronger President; Millionaires believe Romney has a better chance of balancing the budget; Millionaires believe Romney’s tax plan will cost them less; and Millionaires believe the Romney Presidency will be more business friendly.”
In short, millionaires see themselves in Mitt Romney and they think they look pretty damn good. And it should come as no surprise that people who think they can buy affection or attraction also believe in someone who thinks he can buy this election. We wouldn’t mind getting some of that sugar ourselves, though.
Winter’s coming and baby needs some sweet.
BJ McFrisky
You mean to tell me that innovative, self-supporting go-getters are supporting the Republican, while mooching, do-nothing whores prefer the Democrat? Wow, this IS news. I guess one has to get up pretty goddamn early in the morning to pull the wool over Queerty’s observant eyes.
Neo
Terrorist supporting neo-conservatives who are out of kilter with the world willing to buy their way back into the hot seat with lies, murder and blood of millions.
It isn’t surprising these vermin republicans need the power to chain up honest, moral working people.
Charlie in Charge
@BJ McFrisky: It’s likely more a case of Robber Barons seeing themselves in a like-minded individual and the dwellers at the bottom of the financial food chain look to the person they think can improve their circumstances.
LandStander
@BJ McFrisky: I like how you describe sugar daddies as “innovative, self-supporting go-getters” lol
BJ McFrisky
@LandStander: Silly LandStander, I was simply exploiting the class warfare that the Dems have been declaring for decades. And yes, the Right tends to consist of innovative, self-supporting go-getters, unlike the entitled minions who populate the Left.
@Charlie in Charge: Robber Barons—too funny! The rich have gained their wealth “off the backs of the poor,” right? You guys are SO brainwashed.
@Neo: Conservatives are terrorists? Why, because liberals are trying to steal what’s ours and make it theirs? Funny definition of terrorism, that.
Happy Wednesday
BJM
Neo
@BJ McFrisky: Another fact you are a trolling account. You did not acknowledge the distinction between Neo-Conservatives and regular Conservatives.
Fail, and in one motion you have rendered everything you have to say even more worthless than it already was. Do you remember when back on Usenet in 98 we got the names and addresses of your friends and exposed their child pornography ring.
I was one of those people that helped put your mates in jail, where they belong.
Charlie in Charge
@BJ McFrisky: You say “the Right tends to consist of innovative, self-supporting go-getters”
How do you explain the fact that the states that receive the most federal funding are Red? How then do you explain that the states that receive the least federal funding are blue? Why can’t they self-support?
LandStander
@BJ McFrisky: I see that I cannot have a conversation with you about politics without you reverting to calling people names and being generally disrespectful, so ok!
~Have fun trying to convince people that conservatism is the answer while calling them whores, entitled minions and thieves.
Peter
@BJ McFrisky: There’s grasshoppers and ants in both parties, but yes, I do think the grasshoppers tend to congregate around the Democrats.
BJ McFrisky
@Neo: My friends are jailed pedophiles? How come no one told me this? Please, relay to me the names of my jailed friends so I can visit them, because now I feel guilty that I apparently have many friends rotting in prison whom I’ve never even written, much less visited. Which I guess makes me a baaaaaad friend of pedophiles.
You guys and your nasty, baseless, fraudulent attacks. Next time try using facts instead of rhetoric, and you might come across as more of an intelligent adult with an opinion and less a petulant little girl throwing a tantrum.
BJ McFrisky
@Peter: Bingo. And thank you for your civil reply.
LandStander
@BJ McFrisky: I notice that as soon as I pointed out that you were calling people names and being generally disrespectful, you accuse others of making “nasty, baseless, fraudulent attacks.” What happened to your whore and thief posts?
” Next time try using facts instead of rhetoric, and you might come across as more of an intelligent adult with an opinion and less a petulant little girl throwing a tantrum.”
That is good advice. Take it.