This article is pretending to be a general piece about super-delegates. Yet the only people interviewed were Clinton campaign officials. If Clinton cannot win the normal delegates and yet the party machine puts her over the top, there will be a lot of disaffected voters out there.

Article seems a cut and paste job from other sources.

This article is completely biased towards Clinton. I agree with the first comment, it starts off mascarading as a general piece and then talks only about Clinton and what she needs to do and how she is a better candidate.

If Hillary is more electable then why do all Polls show Obama doing better against McCain in a general election? Also, Obama has won more states, delegates(actually voted on), votes and geographic area than Clinton. If superdelegates end up choosing a candidate with less support from the actual primary voters, all hell is going to break loose. It will cripple the democratic party. Be prepared for looting and rioting.

Relax. There are not enough uncommitted super delegates to put either candidate over the top at this point.