If you don’t vote Yes On 1 in Maine, school boys will be forced to wear dresses in the classroom and field hockey will be mandatory for school girls! The claims made in Stand 4 Marriage Maine’s first television ad, airing today, are just as ridiculous. (Jeremy Hooper already released his response.) So far, the only person starring in the group’s ads is Boston College Law School professor Scott T. Fitzgibbon, who’s also a member of the Society of Catholic Social Scientists, a front group for inserting scripture into academia and other fields. But when will the actors with those Maine accents, who were recruited by some faggy San Francisco film company, make their first showing?
scare tactics
The 1st Round of Misinformation From Maine’s Marriage Foes
Help make sure LGBTQ+ stories are being told...
We can't rely on mainstream media to tell our stories. That's why we don't lock Queerty articles behind a paywall. Will you support our mission with a contribution today?
Cancel anytime · Proudly LGBTQ+ owned and operated
B
Queerty: If you don’t vote Yes On 1 in Maine, school boys will be forced to wear dresses in the classroom and field hockey will be mandatory for school girls! The claims made in Stand 4 Marriage Maine’s first television ad, airing today, are just as ridiculous.”
The claims are not “just as ridiculous” although they could well be wrong (a lot depends on what the laws are in Maine). There was
nothing as absurd as “school boys forced to wear dresses”. It
was rather a FUD (Fear Uncertainty and Doubt) piece about the possibilities of lawsuits and children being taught something nebulous about same-sex marriages (such as “they exist”, which the kiddies could be taught anyway given that Maine is right next to Massachusetts).
It’s the bogus claims that people won’t immediately laugh at that you should be especially worried about.
AlwaysGay
VOTE NO ON QUESTION 1
All that matters is does it gives heterosexuals excuses to discriminate. This guy could be in a dark room with a flashlight underneath his chin and all that would matter is does he give heterosexuals excuses to disciminate. Heterosexuals want to discriminate. They believe you are inferior and deserve less rights than them but they want flowery rhetoric that doesn’t make them look like the bigots they truly are.
EqualityMaine needs your help. If you live outside of Maine you can help too. EqualityMaine and the Courage Campaign have set up phonebanks so you can contact Maine voters to urge them to vote NO on Question 1. There are many other things you can do to communicate with Maine voters so they vote NO on Question 1. http://www.protectmaineequality.org/index.cfm
ericka.valladolid
Th ads are corrct. Mountains of evidence not only suggest, but demonstrate that this is exactly the intention of the “gay” agenda.
In places where same sex is legal in other countries, mandatory instruction of homosexuality happens as young as five. Right now it is a national scandal in Britain, the “Dutch” have a model that gay activists are trying to push on every country with same sex marriage.
That can not be denied. All you have to do is google it on the internet.
Denying reality is defending the indefensible when it comes to this issue. Proposition 8 was lost in California because the suppporters ads were in fact correct, and were proven to be.