Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
  proactive duty

The Argument To Only Let Soldiers Weigh In On DADT Has One Glaring Flaw

If there is one thing any sane person should do, it is avoid comment threads and letters to the editor. But of course, those are the most fun parts of any publication. Especially Stars & Stripes, where military personnel can write in with their gripes about terrorists, the heat, and of course, the gays.

Luckily blogger Just-A-Joe, the active duty Iraq soldier facing a DADT discharge, is reading the paper for us, acting as our own personal clipping service, and points us to this one from Warrant Officer Marcus Tanner in Afghanistan.

I guess morality should be out of the debate [on gays in the military], right? I stand firm on my convictions regardless of liberals who have lowered morals/values and follow what society says is right. It is my obligation as a leader, Christian, husband and father to live a life of integrity and point out that homosexuality should not be allowed openly in the military.

Readiness will not be affected [if "don’t ask, don’t tell" remains the policy]; there is always someone who will step up and fill a gap. No one is irreplaceable. Homosexuality is deviant behavior between two men or women behind closed doors. If being gay is right, why isn’t everyone? It takes a man and a woman to procreate. Biology 101.

[I also stand firm] regardless of a separation of church and state, which is a thin line since the “Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag” and prayer are still very much a part of government. Does “In God We Trust” and “One Nation Under God” sound familiar? Society wants to tell the military how to operate. Fine, pick up a rifle and stand next to me.

Only servicemembers should vote for the repeal [of "don’t ask, don’t tell"]. It is the military [affected by the] policy, not civilians. Stop putting words in our mouths about change. Whatever happens, happens. We will deal with the economic disaster it will create. If gays are allowed to serve openly, they/their partners will rate full benefits.

I and my family deserve the right not to live, shower, or be subjected to the homosexual lifestyle. Question: If an unmarried servicemember has a child, shouldn’t the other parent rate benefits? What bonds them is not a civil union. Creation does. Why not focus on something that seriously affects servicemembers and their ability to provide for their families, like the failure of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Homeowners Assistance Program for military families affected by the mortgage crisis?

Yeah, gays, you’re getting in the way of solving the housing crisis, the neighborhoods you’ve spruced up be damned! Maybe you can find four or five flaws in the letter writer’s argument — like how, when there’s a rule passed by Congress and not just Pentagon officials, it becomes a civilian issue — but Joe finds this doozy:

I agree with the letter writer in his letter when he states that the ones in the military are the ones who need to be debating this issue. This is a reasonable assessment, but only if the homosexuals in the military, like myself, can openly speak about it, otherwise there is no debate thus invalidating the process.

Ugh. So annoying when logistics get in the way of things.

By:           editor editor
On:           Apr 20, 2010
Tagged: , , ,

  • 4 Comments
    • Andy
      Andy

      To be fair, they also have this: http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=125&article=69447

      Apr 20, 2010 at 11:01 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Dave
      Dave

      Not to worry, GetEqual is going to yell at military officials soon.

      Apr 20, 2010 at 11:13 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Joe
      Joe

      That man is entitled to his opinion, and I respect it. But I just want to point out a few things. He stated that if homosexuality were right, then why isn’t everybody gay? Well, if heterosexuality was right, then why isn’t everybody straight? You cant ask a question like that and not expect it to be put down. And I do not agree that only those in the military should have a say. As a partner of a soldier in the US Army I damn well feel that I have the right to being asked as well. And what about the people who want to join, but are afraid, because they dont want to be moved away from home, only to be booted out by the military for being who they are? They should have a say as well. And if you were REALLY such a moral man, you would leave the Army. Because guess what, they allow felons and ex-druggies in the military now. And don’t assume that just because you have a penis, that my partner wants to see it in the shower. Quit flattering yourself, he is happy with mine and definately doesn’t want yours!

      Apr 20, 2010 at 1:34 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Lamar
      Lamar

      “If being gay is right, why isn’t everyone?” – WTF, imagine if black was inserted there or left handed, would it still make sense? NO! Deviance from the majority doesn’t necessarily mean it is wrong or unnatural. “Society wants to tell the military how to operate” because the military is funded by American tax payers so they should definetely be entitled to a say moron. “I and my family deserve the right not to live, shower, or be subjected to the homosexual lifestyle” doesn’t make sense either because seeing two men kiss or hearing them talk about same sex sex isn’t subjecting you to any lifestyle anymore than when straight people kiss or talk about straight sex in public. He has no point it is as simple as this: WHO YOU SCREW IN BED DOESN’T AFFECT YOUR EFFECTIVENESS IN COMBAT.

      Apr 20, 2010 at 2:39 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    FOLLOW US
     



    GET QUEERTY'S DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.