Now aren’t you precious? Maybe you should go suck his dick.

The truth is that the Church of England under its founder Henry VIII disowned the Roman Catholic Church and wanted nothing to do with it. Basically, the Church of England was founded to further a sex scandal of sorts – Henry VIII serially dumping one wife after another because he wanted a male heir to the throne and blamed his wives for not producing one.

The look of disappointment on Hitler’s face and the trembling fingers as he removes his glasses upon hearing the news of Palin’s resignation, reduced me, literally, to ROTF and LMAO.

The guy who played Hitler sure had the look, actions and the voice down pat. He deserves an Academy Award for that performance. LOL

OMFG!!! That Hilter & Palin video is fucking brilliant!

I am amazed only 14,500 views; I will be sending the link often. This video should be hitting all over the web — hysterically entertaining and major league social commentary.

Check it out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....&NR=1

Thank you Schlukitz, my hubby and I enjoyed really good laughs watching Herr GOPFuehrer!

You wrote:

Thanks for the condescending post.

Please allow me to amend your reply to Imani, if I may be so bold as to do so.

“Thanks for the condescending, demeaning, mean-spirited, bigoted, hateful, Christian, anti-homosexual, spit-in-our-eye, post.

I wonder when was the last time that Imani sent his hair shirt out to be dry cleaned? It must stink to holy hell from having been worn it for so long without being removed, don’t you think, Romeo?

I also know of this great little shop down in the West Village where he can get that whip he has probably worn out by now from all that self-flagellation, replaced by a brand, spanking new one.

Pun intended. ;P

http://history1900s.about.com/.....cestry.htm

Damn. Herr Hosen Schisser (trousers shitter) looked liked he was possessed by a demon even as a Jugend. I mean, look at those scary eyes.

The Google translator was not the only one to have a stroke. LOL

After countless hours of trying unsuccessfully to decipher der Papenfuehrer’s Proclamation, translators concluded that “holstein” which was the only recognizable word, seemed to imply that this was just another pile of bullshit, just like all of his other Proclamations and hence the words are meaningless and irrelevant. LOL

Like your wundervoll, der papenfuehrer, read on an English Blog, I too garnered the meaningless statement in German I quoted above from a blog following a video on YouTube “When Hitler finds out Governor Palin has resigned”. It is subtitled in English and is hysterical.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....&NR=1

It says “Around 85% of Ugandans are Christian – 40% Catholics, 35% Anglican. Muslims make up 12% of the population…” The European cults have to keep a lid on it in Europe and the because of the advances of the American and French revolutions, particularly the widespread use of the guillotine for especially backward clerics.

In Africa no such examples hold them in check (except in South Africa) because for the most part Africa is not post-colonial but neo-colonial. “A policy whereby a major power uses economic and political means to perpetuate or extend its influence over underdeveloped nations or areas: “Strong elements of neocolonialism persist in the economic relations of the rich and poor countries” (Scientific American).”

The Guardian also quotes Peter Tatchell, a leader of the LGBT movement in England saying “In many cases, these countries are using laws imposed by the British in colonial times. Before that, homosexuality was actually tolerated or accepted in the traditional cultures.”

Bottom line, the bible is very clear — it’s the death penalty for eating clam chowder.

Are you really so sure that you can discern God’s meaning? You are a poor, deluded soul.

As well as Warren, Scott Lively, Don Schmierer and Caleb Lee Brindridge are named

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worl.....omosexuals

#78 Imani….what an idiot you are. Check out the old testament, part of your book of fairy tales in which it permits husbands to kill their wives and children for adultery and insubordination, among many other things. Your insistence that “homosexuality” is a perversion is all down to the moron(s) who wrote it and it wasn’t some sky pilot since you have no proof. Do yourself a favor and refer to http://www.fallwell.com then tell us you believe it all and if you don’t, you can’t claim to be a believer. Stop cherry-picking this and that to suit your own hate agenda and address the hypocrisy and bigotry of your own ilk and get your own breeder houses in order first before judging us. You either believe in the book, all of it which makes you even more of a moron, or you don’t, you can’t have it both ways.

I’m so sorry to hear that the poor anglicans reject one of the central dogmas of the roman lunatics and deny transubstantiation, that fantastically mysterious, magical transformation of bread and wine into the meat and blood of jebuz.

Without ritual cannibalism how can any self-respecting cult expect to attract loonies.

And on “der paperfuehrer” I first read that on an English blog, but I like it and use it often. Here’s my favorite picture of young Alois Schickelgruber… er Ratzinger in his HitlerJugend drag. http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_uuEa...../ratzinger

Later he wore Luftwaffe drag and now he wears Prada.

In No. 41 • BTPeri stupidly said “Bill, sorry you feel so much anger!” Actually, I do get angry about the violence christians inflict on us and especially about their lying denials that it occurs.

However most of my comments are in line with the thoughts of an American revolutionist named Samuel Adams, a key leader in the world-shattering transformation that began at Lexington in 1775 and ended at Yorktown. Adams, an accomplished political rebel said, “It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people’s minds.”

Many of the ideas that leftists raise are perfectly reasonable although audacious. Things like ending the war, spending trillions on workers not the rich and derailing the theocrats need to be implemented. The difference between a revolutionary leftist approach and a ‘let’s all hold our noses and work in the Democrat party’ reformist approach is that the ideas and program leftists raise, however reasonable, cannot be accomplished without a fundamental change in society.

” De l’audace, encore de l’audace, toujours de l’audace…!”

“Audacity, more audacity, always audacity …!” Danton, French Revolutionist

Actually, although I do get angry about the violence christians inflict on us but most of my comments are in line with the thoughts of an AmeriCANcAN

One of his Bishops recently had the audacity to suggest to the Papenfuehrer that it might be in the best interest of the Church to adopt a more positive and supportive position with respect to homosexuals if the they wished to survive and prosper during the new millennium.

This so enraged the Papenfuehrer, that he erupted into a Hitleresque display of anger wherein he made the following proclamation.

Er FlugenHeisten bolstein fuuger er unsten holstein kreima un FOLGERSPIFT!

Sensible? Say what???

Yes, they did…and beautifully I might add.

Thank you ever so much. It was very kind and thoughtful of you to send them and I do appreciate it.

No doubt, you have received my email reply by now. :)

Sensible? Are you freakin kidding me?

Ah yes. Now that you mention it, I do recall your having posted something about the name change awhile back. I take it then, that you relocated from Brooklyn, NY to Ashville, NC? And, if that is the case, how do you like your new home?

With respect to your comment about the dress wearing colleagues in Rome:

I can deal with with a man wearing a dress. The Irish come close to that with their kilts, which can be kind of sexy on the right kind of guy.

What blows me out of the water, are those mitered, jewel-bedecked chapeaus from the House of Whoville. LOL

Love the Tudors, and Jonathan is hot (well except the sex scenes are with women; he’s a brute; rapist; and murderer).

(BTW, it got cold here too, but here is Asheville, NC. Weird, I changed my name and it appears in most posts as Mike in Asheville, not sure why under this article, my name reverted back to Mike in Brooklyn.)

@No. 65 B

I know the history well enough. That the reformation grew out of Martin Luther’s 95 theses; that Henry VIII joined the march of the reformation in [significant] part so that he could divorce his first wife and marry Anne Boleyn, yadda, yadda, yadda …

My point referred to comments that unlike the Catholic “cult” (referenced @No.29) the Church of England had rebuked the proposed Ugandan legislation. This is in error; as I posted earlier, the Archbishop of Canterbury made specific statements supporting the Ugandan government’s right to criminalize homosexual conduct with penalties of death and life imprisonment. He argued that the Church of England should not interfere with Uganda’s efforts to determine acceptable moral conduct. At the same time, the Archbishop did involve himself and the Church into countering the election of a lesbian to the post of bishop in Los Angeles.

To the Archbishop and the Church of England, it is acceptable that gays and lesbians be executed or imprisoned AND that it is unacceptable for gays and lesbians to hold positions within the Anglican Church.

The Archbishop of Canterbury is as culpable and two-faced as Prick Warren and their dress wearing colleagues in Rome; the Anglican Church is as evil as the Roman Cult; thus “lump” them together.

I love it, Bill. What a perfect description for the Prada bedecked and House of Whoville toppered, Pope Ratzass! LOL
I’ll have to remember that one.

Humor aside, everything you said about the church is dead-on and like Robert, I could not have put it better either.

The majority of these cults are nothing more than parasites, a cancer in society. Religious cultism is the last refuge for the insecure, frightened, mentally ill and sexually repressed and perverted.

The Anglican cult for the most part will NEVER merge with its big sister in Rome, transubstantiation is the major obstacle to that as well as papal infallibility. The rottweiler in Rome is delusional if he thinks that’s ever going to happen. He’s only making overtures because his own cult has dwindling vocations, in some countries none. Its an act of desperation for a sick cult on the verge of extinction. Proof positive that devolution exists.

Bill, well said, I couldn’t have put it better, thank you.

The anglo catholic cult is, like other prots and evangelicals, a child of the roman catholic cult which in turn is a child of jewish and roman state cults. All the cults are united by their grounding in superstition and coldhearted dogmatism, in their origins in the howling madness of the christian Dark Ages and by their centuries long heritage of ferocious homohating, the racism of the crusades, the enslavement of tens of millions of colonized peoples and the awful effects of misogyny.

Cults have no redeeming features.

There are some differences between the cults but their debates over the number of angels who can dance on the head of a pin are meaningless. We have no stake in their debates over who’s the most ignorant. They all are. A tiny number of cults are more ‘tolerant’ but that’s also meaningless. We need to politically suppress their 24/365 barrage of violence inducing hatred. No one has the right of free speech to promote violence.

The anglo catholic’s have in fact discussed unification with the roman cult for a long time and they have ecumenical consultative bodies that hold frequent discussions. queen Elizabeth, titular head of the anglo cult has had more than one meeting with whatever lunatic in Prada was the current pope.
All of that was spoiled when Karol Wojty?a and his successor, Joseph Alois Ratzinger, aka, der papenfuehrer, made a hard right turn in response to the international explosion of sex abuse scandals. They made homohating a cardinal rule. Most of Williams maneuvering is an attempt to placate the anglican global south group, violent bigots who comprise the vast majority of anglicans. Global south, under Akinola of Nigeria, wants to secede and/or unify with the roman cult. The would leave a tiny rump anglican ‘community’ of mostly European anglicans even more dependent on the episcopal cult in the US for money. Money is the driving force behind jesus christ inc.

Williams would probably lose his job, although there’s absolutely no likelihood that he’d ever become a productive member of society and get a real job. He’d probably be reduced to selling used cars or maybe shudder, becoming a lawyer.

Slightly off topic but germane to the conversation you are both having, have either of you had a chance to view the Showtime Production of The Tudors with Johnathan Rhys Meyers?

The Church of England split off from the Roman Catholic Church because Henry VIII wanted to dump his wife ( he dumped quite few in succession) and needed an annulment. He fixed his problems with a couple of his wives by separating their heads from their bodies. In any case, he sent the Pope packing for not being responsive and, as the new head of the church, got just what we wanted.

Given the history, I don’t think the Church of England has any desire to be lumped with the Roman Catholic Church. :-)

I don’t understand your reference. My comment referred to a claim that the Anglican Church has previously rebuked the Ugandan homosexual legislation. My post pointed out that the leader of the Anglican Church, the Archbishop of Canterbury had actually NOT rebuked the Ugandan legislation (and in the same comments rebuked the election of a lesbian to the position of bishop is the Los Angeles diocese).

My point is that today, the Church of England, has not rebuked the proposed Ugandan bill that included the death penalty and life imprisonment for homosexual sexual conduct. To me, the Church of England is as culpable as Prick Warren. (The post I referenced, to me, made a reference that the Church of England was not like the Catholic cult and was for civil rights. And that is NOT correct).

If I am in error, please explain.

One should always pursue one’s bliss and it is my fervent hope that your painting gives you great satisfaction and purpose.

I would more than welcoming for a missile from you, should the spirit move you. I can be reached at cbdcs4u@yahoo.com

May the Universe continue to guide and inspire you.

Guess I was mistaken about Happy Days Are Here Again.

Rain caps back on everyone.

Nope, didn’t get laid off. I’m still a CEO who does just fine, thank you.

Nope, didn’t thump any bibles.

Nope, didn’t get hysterical. I just asked some questions that were conveniently ignored.

Nope, I don’t do gay bashing. My gay friends wouldn’t appreciate that … don’t feel that way, see no reason to go there. And, please note, I didn’t find a need to add any profanity, name calling, or character assassinations to my posts.

As for the video … did you see the whole interview or read the transcript. Yes, it is out there, but perhaps not the edit job posted on You Tube. And no, he wasn’t equating gays with pedophiles … he was talking about a more generic issue, and made that clear when the “semantic analysis” of his words was interpreted in a negative context …

No, I’m not a fan of anti-gay activists or sentiment.

And your assumptions continue to be way off target.

Curiously, the squabble was about sex – Henry wanted to change spouses.

In No 19, I posted a link to http://www.pensitoreview.com/2.....pedophila/ which quoted Warren in a video interview comparing same-sex marriage to marriage between a brother and sister and to polygamy. When asked if he meant what he said, he said, “Oh I do.” He went beyond publishing something silly in a church bulletin.

That URL has a link to a video to go with it, but Youtube is now blocking it due to some service violation (probably copyright, but I can see how some Christians would want it suppressed). Normally people don’t misquote someone and then include a video link that can prove they got it wrong.

So, it seems he said things that were completely out of line. If he was merely preaching in his church or babbling while drunk in a bar, nobody would care, but this was with respect to an initiative to change the California State Constitution to deny a minority civil rights. People are mad at him for a very good reason. If Warren had done something to take away BTPeri’s civil rights, he would be mad at Warren too.

Seriously?
http://tinyurl.com/ybbcppd