Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
discrimination nation

The Illinois B&Bs That Won’t Welcome A Gay Couple’s Disgusting Civil Union Ceremony


Notice to all American businesses: From now on you will not get away with discriminating against gay couples, so why not just stop? You don’t (I hope) discriminate against blacks and Latinos, so it’s time to take gays off the list of acceptable types of clientele to turn away. Those signs that say “we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone” are fine to deal with drunks and streakers; not gays. But the Beall Manison and the TimberCreek B&B in Mattoon, Illinois, south of Chicago, haven’t learned this lesson. They allegedly refused to let Todd Wathen and his partner host their civil union ceremony. Too bad: The Illinois Attorney General is now involved.

Turning to the Bible to explain “traditional weddings,” one owner of the venues Wathen tried booking simply told him that gay unions were wrong.

The Illinois Religious Freedom Protection and Civil Unions Act, which legalized civil unions for gays, goes into effect in June; Wathen and his partner (who isn’t identified because he’s not fully out) plan to celebrate later that month. But things went awry when they started calling around to see who could host it.

A couple of days after Gov. Pat Quinn signed the bill on Jan. 31, Wathen contacted the Beall Manison in Alton and the TimberCreek B&B in Paxton, about 50 miles south of Kankakee, to book a venue for a ceremony and reception. But in an e-mail reply from the Beall Mansion, Wathen was told, “At this point we will just be doing traditional weddings.” Beall’s definition of traditional weddings: “Weddings as opposed to civil unions.” The inn later e-mailed back to say they did not host civil union ceremonies or receptions for either same-sex or heterosexual couples, “nor do we do many other types of events.” Its website, however, boasts “elegant accommodations for pleasure or business, weddings and receptions … corporate retreats … anniversary parties, fund-raising events, bridal and baby showers.”

While the Beall treid to avoid the issue, Timber Creek was more emphatic in its denial. In an e-mail reply to Wathen, Jim A. Walder of the TimberCreek Bed & Breakfast wrote: “We will never host same-sex civil unions. We will never host same-sex weddings even if they become legal in Illinois. “We believe homosexuality is wrong and unnatural based on what the Bible says about it. If that is discrimination, I guess we unfortunately discriminate,” Walder wrote. When informed of the new law, Walder replied, “The Bible does not state opinions, but facts. It contains the highest laws pertinent to man. It trumps Illinois law, United States law, and global law should there ever be any.”

Know what that is? An admission of violating the Illinois Human Rights Act, which bars sexual orientation discrimination. It should go a long way with the couple’s complaints filed with the state AG and the Department of Human Rights. Maybe the settlement will be enough to, say, pay for a wedding?

By:           JD
On:           Feb 23, 2011
Tagged: , , , ,
  • 11 Comments
    • pc
      pc

      Why would you join in a civil union if you’re not completely out? He deserves the discrimination.

      Feb 23, 2011 at 2:40 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Jeffree
      Jeffree

      @PC: No one deserves discrimination based on how “out” they are. The B &Bs are violating the Illinois law, so you don’t get to decide who is worthy of a legal civil union ceremony.

      Since DADT has not been fully repealed yet, it’s possible one of the grooms is a member of the US military. It’s also possible that he works somewhere without workplace antidiscrimination rules or lives/works somewhere he may be subject to violence.

      Feb 23, 2011 at 3:37 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • JAW
      JAW

      why would you want them to profit by hosting the event… leave the damn homophobes and find a nicer venue that has been open to us for years.

      Feb 23, 2011 at 4:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • bob
      bob

      I checked out both websites and could not email either of them. I am assuming they have taken their email offline due to this publicity. They will probably do a pity thing on some “christian” website to make up for lost business.

      Feb 23, 2011 at 4:50 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • DavyJones
      DavyJones

      @pc: Considering you have no idea of his status, or life situation; that’s a pretty horrible thing to say.

      Feb 23, 2011 at 5:38 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Daez
      Daez

      @DavyJones: No, actually, its pretty true. Its one thing to hide behind the closet door, but its quite another to demand that your partner and your family hide behind the same door.

      Also, unless the state has an anti-discrimination law that includes LGBT or the company itself does there is no course of action in the case. That is why passing laws such as ENDA is so important.

      Feb 23, 2011 at 8:29 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Adonis-of-Fire
      Adonis-of-Fire

      Let’s burn the fucking place to the ground with its owners inside!

      Feb 24, 2011 at 1:37 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Jeffree
      Jeffree

      I suspect the B&B owners would have no problem allowing an all-male bachelor party — complete with ladies removing garments!

      I hope they lose their licenses to provide public accomodations.

      Feb 24, 2011 at 2:12 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Owen
      Owen

      @JAW: Agreed. This will just galvanize the weak-kneed religious sympathizers into siding with the bigots.

      Just move onto a place that will accept your money. Jeez.

      Feb 24, 2011 at 3:44 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • TommyOC
      TommyOC

      @Adonis-of-Fire: Lay of the crack and stop being so inflammatory, you troll.

      Feb 24, 2011 at 5:57 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • B
      B

      No. 3 · JAW wrote, “why would you want them to profit by hosting the event… leave the damn homophobes and find a nicer venue that has been open to us for years.”

      Aside from the obvious – the couple didn’t know these B&Bs were run by homophobes until rejected – why should you have to spend more time than straights have to spend in finding a place that would let you in?

      Also, if only 10% of B&B’s allowed gays, how hard would it be to travel, particularly during the peak tourist season, and how much more would you end up paying?

      There’s very good reason to make an example of these bigots by not letting them ignore the law with impunity.

      Feb 26, 2011 at 9:12 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • QUEERTY DAILY

     




    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.