Barbara Walters has the exclusive that Beatle, who had his first daughter, Susan, in June is once again pregnant. He chose not to go back on male hormone treatment after his first daughter's birth so that he could have anothe child. Beatle is in his first trimester. [ABC]
Is It Wrong to Refuse to Have Sex With HIV-Positive Men? (93)
· dontblamemeivotedforhillary says: Assholes have been around a lot longer than AIDS. Fucking an... »
We Love It When Neil Patrick Harris Gets ROUGH (1)
· dontblamemeivotedforhillary says: Que? »
Jay Leffew Is Sorry For Attacking Davey Wavey, But Not YouTube’s Apathetic Gays (1)
· Fitz says: F’ing Christian. Bring me a lion. »
What Does the House’s Healthcare Bill Mean to You? Tax-Free Benefits, That’s What (5)
· Republican says: Oh, and the battle will be over much more than just the abortion funding (or lack... »
· Fitz says: R, that’s good news (re: non medical abortion)! I still sincerely doubt that DP tax... »
· Republican says: Fitz, I watched C-SPAN last night and they passed an amendment to the bill that... »
Ellen’s Dream Comes True: Oprah Let the Lez Lady on the Cover of Her Magazine (2)
· dontblamemeivotedforhillary says: I was blinded by the white on the cover of ‘O’... »
DNC Explains What Happened In Maine (But Not Why It Bailed on Question 1) (9)
· Bill Perdue says: No. 7 • Attmay and No. 6 • michael – The Republicans and the Democrats have... »
Can’t A Television Show Say ‘Fag’ Anymore Without GLAAD Getting Upset? (72)
· Luc R says: It has always ment the same meaning to me as it does in the south park episode, ive been... »
Does Oprah Really Care if Rosie Calls Her Gay? (2)
· Sebs says: totatlly agree with rosie oprah come out already!!! »
Beatie. Thomas Beatie. Not Beatle.
Uhh. 'He's' not a man. 'He' has a uterus and a vagina. Therefore, 'he' is a woman.
"He" is a freak beyond any measure.
I don't see why people disapprove. Why? Is it "not natural"? Where have I heard that before.
Congratulations, Thomas.
@psy: I don't disapprove. I just don't see the need for all the publicity. Whatever 'he' might call himself, the reason he can get pregnant is because 'he' is a biological woman.
I was referring more to the "freak" comment, but I get what you're saying. I agree it should be a non-issue.
Oh that. Yeah, he was bang out of order there.
I'd like to congratulate you on the birth of your first child, Susan, and now on your newly impending birth to baby #2. I'm not sure why they're making such a fuss over a loving couple who will love their family. Isn't that what parenthood is all about? Two people loving each other, and sharing that love with their children?
People making a big deal over this, should not only examine the love in their own families, but think twice about why this concept of "FAMILY" is truly upsetting you. God made each and every one of us to live our lives & be happy about doing so.
Not too many women I know named Thomas…I'm just saying.
She's pregnant again? Awfully fertile pursuit of celebrity.
To the Transphobic gay folk, a quick quote: "The true focus of revolutionary change is never the oppressive situations which we seek to escape, but that piece of the oppressor which is planted deep within us." ~ Audre Lorde
Why is this news?!? It's not like there's a fetus gestating in his scrotum. Call yourself what you want, but IMHO, if you are currently using your ovaries, uterus and vaginal canal. You are a woman.
I find it so ironic that the people who have decried the backlash at black folk for "becoming the oppressors" – have become the oppressors themselves – at trans folk. Shame on you! If Beattie identifies as a man, then he's a man, period. What he does with his body should have no bearing on that.