Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
IN QUOTES

Thomas, The Evil Gay Of “Downton Abbey”, Is Coming Out In Season 3

Thomas-downton

It’s the series where we really comes to grips with Thomas’s sexuality and the impact being gay must have had on him, in Edwardian times. If you’re including a gay character, there’s an onus and responsibility to at least show what the impact of the time will be on him, and of him on that time. Thankfully we’ve done that, and I’m so proud that I’ve been used to tell that tale…If you were gay in those times, the fact that you’re even functioning, how you’re not completely fucked up by that, is beyond me.”

The devilishly handsome Rob James-Collier offers some insight into his character’s story arc for the upcoming season of Downton Abbey to Out magazine.

By:           Les Fabian Brathwaite
On:           Jan 3, 2013
Tagged: , ,
  • 18 Comments
    • BritAus
      BritAus

      Hasn’t the Thomas already come out?

      Jan 3, 2013 at 9:34 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • BritAus
      BritAus

      that was mean to read “the character of” Thomas etc

      Jan 3, 2013 at 9:36 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • BritAus
      BritAus

      meant – DAMNIT !

      Jan 3, 2013 at 9:36 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Tracy
      Tracy

      Season 3? Isn’t that already over?

      Jan 3, 2013 at 9:45 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Lester Brathwaite
      Lester Brathwaite · Queerty Editor

      @Tracy Starts Sunday on PBS and @BritAus some of the other characters are kind of aware of it but no one really acknowledges it. In true Edwardian fashion.

      Jan 3, 2013 at 11:20 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Snausages
      Snausages

      He is not ugly.

      Jan 3, 2013 at 12:29 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Joel J
      Joel J

      @Tracy: It begins Jan 6th in the U.S. to much anticipation.

      Jan 3, 2013 at 12:58 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • 1EqualityUSA
      1EqualityUSA

      I want Gwen, the one who bought the typewriter, to come back filthy rich for having gotten in on the ground floor of the telephone company. That would be a good plot twist. Perhaps she could even come to the financial aid of the she-babe daughter (nurse) who helped her get her start. Sir Richard Carlisle needs to lose his fortune in the stock market crash.

      Jan 3, 2013 at 1:28 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • erasure25
      erasure25

      @1EqualityUSA: I want Gwen to come back and extoll: “You know nothing, Richard Carlisle.”

      Jan 3, 2013 at 1:33 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Joel J
      Joel J

      I want Thomas to have a hot, steamy relationship. After he gets screwed, his personality changes and he becomes Mr. Nice Guy much to the consternation of all: “I wonder what’s come over Thomas.”

      Jan 3, 2013 at 2:12 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Michael Bedwell
      Michael Bedwell

      It was bad enough that the show’s creator [whose literary limitations are revealed repeatedly in S3] needlessly chose to make his one continuing gay character out of more than a dozen nongay regulars a villain. But all this about how Thomas’s evil can be excused is the same kind of stinking hogwash that Dustin Lance Black tried to bathe J. Edgar Hoover in for Clint Eastwood’s execrable film. “Downton Abbey”-era Brit playwright/song writer Noel Coward, economist John Maynard Keynes, writers E.M. Forster and Lytton Strachey, poet Siegfried Sassoon, painter Duncan Grant, actor Ivor Novello—among countless other gays—didn’t gleefully engage in all the rot that the Thomas character does. That’s not actor James-Collier’s fault, but, to re-turn a phrase—let’s not confuse his character’s pissing on so many legs with rain and rainbows.
      .
      Julian Fellowes’ Thomas is not Victor Hugo’s Jean Valjean forced to steal bread to save his sister’s starving children. He has multiple opportunities to not do evil, but chooses Wrong again and again, and that is not excused by the probability that he would have been a social pariah had his homosexuality been confirmed, and possibly imprisoned for homosexual acts. To forgive him is to suggest forgiveness for the emotionally disturbed husband and father sinking in poverty, political betrayal, and a cultural revolution passing him by, who grew up hearing stories of the demonization of his Irish Catholic ancestors [SEE: “paddy wagon”], for his acts. His name was Dan White.

      Jan 3, 2013 at 4:21 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • LadyL
      LadyL

      @Michael Bedwell: Oh, wait now. First of all Coward, Keynes, Forster, Strachey and company were all educated individuals whose professional success and public acclaim inevitably made easier (not easy, but certainly easier) their opportunities for the kind of love and companionship denied a below stairs servant like Thomas Barrow.
      Indeed Thomas’s anger–like that of the presumably heterosexual lady’s maid O’Brien–seem to stem as much from resentment of his low-born social status and frustration in being unsuccessful in escaping it as anything else. Combine that unhappiness with the bitter realities of what it means in that time and place to be both poor and gay: an emotional/romantic/sexual life lived (of necessity) in secret with the ever-present danger of discovery looming over you. Is it really so difficult to understand Thomas’s spiteful impulses? Put yourself in his place–you are surrounded by others who even in their socially and financially reduced circumstances are nevertheless allowed to fall in love and marry. The happy promise of those relationships are openly shared and celebrated. But you are never allowed the same–you can only watch everyone else as your loneliness deepens and burns.
      *
      And I do think it’s possible to sympathize with Thomas on these points without excusing away every malicious thing he does. True, he often behaves like an arrogant jerk with a nasty disposition. But he’s also demonstrated that he can empathize with someone else’s pain and loneliness and grieve their loss, and be vulnerable to hurt, and open to love and friendship. So I wouldn’t characterize him as evil and I don’t think Fellowes does either.

      Jan 3, 2013 at 8:36 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • LadyL
      LadyL

      @Michael Bedwell: And–Dan White?! You’re really comparing Thomas Barrow to a self-loathing homophobic real-life multiple murderer???

      Jan 3, 2013 at 8:54 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Joel J
      Joel J

      @Joel J: Or, as Mrs. Patmore would say, “I wonder what’s got into Thomas.”

      Jan 3, 2013 at 10:59 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • 1EqualityUSA
      1EqualityUSA

      LadyL, You rock. Thanks for the words above.

      Jan 3, 2013 at 11:33 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • John Doe
      John Doe

      I read in a British newspaper recently that the writer of Downton Abbey will be writing an American version of Downton Abbey…. a historical piece based in New York.

      Jan 4, 2013 at 2:59 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • LadyL
      LadyL

      @John Doe: Oh, no!

      Jan 9, 2013 at 10:27 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Joel J
      Joel J

      @LadyL: The characters in Downton Abbey are all trapped within the rigid English class system. That is a main theme of the series. WWI begins to erode that system as the characters break out of their assigned roles. We learn of Thomas’ homosexuality when he is rebuffed by one of the Crawleys’ upper class house guests, someone with whom, it is suggested, he had previous sexual relations.

      Jan 9, 2013 at 10:57 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • QUEERTY DAILY

     


    POPULAR ON QUEERTY


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.