Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
 

Titties Too Much For WH Smith

diva_censored.jpgdiva_acceptable.jpg
There’s some not-so-super censorship happening over England way!

Book retailer WH Smith objected to DIVA magazine’s tit-tastic April cover, which led the editors to alter the cover – an homage to Rolling Stone’s iconic John and Yoko cover. While WH Smith claims it didn’t insist on the alteration exhibited above, the entire thing still stinks, says UK Gay News:

…WH Smith whose shelves contain a wide range of titles aimed at the more adult end of the market, not to mention the tabloid newspapers that often publish “topless” photos of girls, sometimes two girls together in a much more salacious pose that on the original DIVA cover.

The retailer could hardly have demanded the cover changed because of part of one female breast, as on sale are many other titles with female breasts.

So, how about homophobia? Heterosexuality is championed and celebrated all around us on billboards, magazine covers, in film, and on TV, but lesbian sexuality is considered by some as shameful.

This could hardly be the case as the “acceptable” cover still depicts two women – naked and in an embrace.

A spokesperson for WH Smith said that the projected cover was “a step away from the magazine’s usual covers”.

What’s good for the gander apparently ain’t good for the goose…

What do you think of this post?
LOL (0) WTF (0) Hot (0) More Please (1)
By:           Andrew Belonksy
On:           Feb 28, 2008
Tagged: , , , , ,
3 Comments

No. 1 · Lelend Frances

Wait – are those real Lesbians on the cover? They better be! Look – no comments.

Posted: Feb 28, 2008 at 6:49 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 2 · leomoore · Member · 647 comments

They don’t look like any lesbians I’ve ever met, but it is possible, I suppose.

Posted: Feb 28, 2008 at 11:49 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 3 · Vicky

So who at WHSmith wasn’t happy with it?! I work at their head office so would love to ask them!
For goodness’ sake, the covers of FHM are generally more explicit than that!

Posted: Mar 7, 2008 at 5:15 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]

Add your Comment




It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



POPULAR ON QUEERTY

Copyright 2012 Queerty, Inc.
Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.