(Starts singing…~Sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes you don’t).

In all other regards, I can agree with a non assimilationist proposition for gay liberation.

The Top and Bottom game is so tired and so Heterosexual. I wish Queers would grow up, Evolve!

Versatile is the best way to play, and the best way to avoid Primitive Heterosexual Role-Playing. People can often be more aggressive or dominant when Catching than when Pitching.

There are no essentially “Passive” or “Active” roles in Sex, nor essentially submissive or dominant roles. To divide sex play into such roles is a bi-polar mimickry of patriarchal male domination over Femininity, and the reduction of the Feminine into the “bottom” social position during much of our Human past. In Nature, the Feminine is far from the “bottom”, perhaps why nature is called “Mother”.

Two APD undercover officers said sex was going on in the backroom of the Eagle and one was groped at the bar.
I believe them.

Of course you would! Just like any good religious fanatic would believe the DoJ stating that homosexual relationships are akin to incest and bestiality rather than take the word of a queer.

And, despite your meaningless apology about getting off-topic, you continue to insist that sex was going on in the backroom of the Eagle, without proof, despite the fact that you were not actually there and in spite of the lack of any articles on Google that back-up your assertion.

Judge, Jury and Executioner, all rolled up into one, are ya? I was under the impression that we had a judicial system that holds that one is not guilty until proven to be so in a court of law.

It seems to me that you are more in favor with an old west lynching mentality instead of a system of laws that should be observing and upholding the civil-rights of citizens.

And tarring and feathering and being run out of town on a rail, without proof of the crime committed, went out with the Colonists.

http://blogs.creativeloafing.c.....nta-eagle/

This excerpt from the above URL was made by the APD on September 11, 2009.

In an effort to ensure compliance with the law, the Police Department investigated the complaints and during the investigation police observed criminal behavior taking place at the Club on September 10, 2009. While the Police were conducting a compliance check it lead to the arrests of eight employees. The Department views all complaints of criminal conduct as serious and will utilize resources to investigate and deter criminal activity in order to create a safe environment.

Note that this non-explicit blah, blah, blah, statement uses the term “criminal behavior”, which is non-specific. The APD Statement does not make make any specific allegation that sex was going on in the back room.

The only patrons arrested, were five of those who were dancing in their underwear, as is common on “Underwear Night” and which in of itself is totally harmless to anyone. The three arrests were for permit violations. Hardly the stuff of an impending terrorist attack or take-over of our government.

I see absolutely no difference in dancing in one’s underwear in a leather bar as opposed to patrons at the Ice Palace on Fire Island wearing swimwear during Sunday Tea Dance. In both instances, both a patron’s ass and his genitals are covered, ergo the claim of “indecent exposure” would never stand up in a court of law.

So where is the “criminal conduct” of dancing in one’s underwear and how is the environment made safer by prohibiting it?

If you are going to pursue this senseless avenue to substantiate you claim that leather bars should be called “unsafe sex clubs”, then to be fair, you should carry your crusade to the straight “topless” bars and the places that allow “lap-dancing” as well.

Not to be deterred by the facts, however, Mr. Merrill just posted, on another thread, that leather bars should be called “unsafe sex clubs”. He has, however, not a shred of proof to support his denigrating comments about the leather community or the Eagle Bar in Atlanta.

And given his statement That’s the problem I have with sex in the Eagle bar in Atlanta., it’s obvious that he has a hard-on for the leather community and leather bars, the Eagle Bar in Atlanta, in particular.

I guess we should all be thankful, however, that as a self-admitted bisexual, Mr. Merrill does look favorably on sex between guys. He just doesn’t approve of leather or rubber fetish, which he has made very clear in his numerous posts on the original thread.

Smells like bullshit to me.

Ah! I did not go unrewarded or disappointed. LOL

Oh, on the subject at hand, I need to experience more fun to really comment. But, with all things I’m sure there’s more ebb and flow and versatility than this study actually reveals.

Absolutely. And i can say that with experience…from both sides of the fence. LOL

Actually, my comment was a facetious one aimed at someone else on these threads who has been tossing that word around on another thread quite a bit lately.

He knows who he is and I am surprised that it has missed his attention. ;>)

But then, the night is young! :>0

I also have a far less severe temper than my partner (than any of my bottom partners), AND I almost never get to win an argument. I am more aggressive in business and sports, I suppose, but I am also FAR more romantic than most bottoms I’ve dated, including my partner of 10 years. I am more likely to cry at a movie, wherein the dog dies. Yet, I am a voracious top.

Go figure….I rather doubt the findings of this study.