Queerty is better as a member
hot, too bad though they are manscaped to every inch
And the jealous comes out in 1,2,3…..
TBH, I kind of like the traditional Bike Jock Strap more. Maybe it’s generational.
i’m usually a total ac fan… but i’m really digging the pistol pete x-jock lol.
@balehead: come now… you should have been able to call it better than that…. for this site it was BOUND to be the “manscaped to death” lobby that showed up first lol
Correction: GOOD THING they are manscapped to every inch cause’ nobody wants to see otherwise.
The product “on display” is the underwear, not the men. And if I were the designer I would have had each man waxed head to toe.
In this case, hairy verses smooth in the eye of the viewer is not the important issue. These underwear have hoops and loops, ties and binds – basically “moving parts” to them – that could grasp, snag, pull, and/or yank on hair in the area that being covered. From a ‘display’ standpoint, you would probably want to keep hair FAR AWAY (from the presentation at least) in order to NOT give anyone the idea that if they are hairy, they are going to be fighting the uncomfortable perception of ripped follicles in the process of trying to wear these wherever the hell one would actually try to wear these.
@Jackhoffsky: You forget the model IS a major part of the product presentation. Why does David Beckham make so much money posing in underwear? A couple of hot hairy men would have been great along with the standard homogenous hairless gay look that’s usually on display on this site.
The comments about hairs getting stuck in the underwear is rather silly. Ever worn a jock? I think any guy could deal with a bit of a lace. Don’t you?
my neighbor’s half-sister makes $72 every hour on the computer. She has been out of a job for 5 months but last month her paycheck was $15252 just working on the computer for a few hours. pop over to this website ………. BAM%32%31%2E%63om
Go to website and click Home tab for more details.
@hanrahanjude: Yeah, you too can work as a spammer annoying the fuck out of people.
@scotshot: No, actually I don’t. LOL.
However in the realms of reality, you are absolutely correct. My point is that in advertising, there is a very specific place for body hair. This would not be one of them. It has nothing to do with reality, it has to do with mental association and fluidity of acceptance from the viewer. Body hair can sometimes enhance that if you are trying to market something masculine (which… these are not… LOL) but you run the risk of alienating large sections of consumers in the Asian market as well as half the European market (who are the biggest consumers of underwear behind the States).
In ad terms, it’s easier for hairy men (and those that like hairy men) to “back track” in thinking after seeing someone well manscaped in print than it is to put someone hairy in print and have those with little body hair overcome the unrelateable visual. It’s not fair, honestly… but it’s how it works.
But I will again say in the real world, you are completely correct.
For this to be a predominantly gay site why not show a butt shot of the jockstraps?
Please log in to add your comment.
Need an account? Register It's free and easy.
PHOTOS: Broadway Gets Into Winter Burlesque With Calendar Girl
PHOTOS: Prohibition Returns to NYC With the Roaring New Twenty Something Party
PHOTOS: The Sundance Queer Preview — 2014 Edition
Long, Loose and Colorful: Fashion Trends For 2014
Most Talked About Model Interviews Of 2013