Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
DOWNHILL RACER

Two Court Losses And A Record Fine: NOM Is Having Its Worst Week Ever

NOMIt’s been a great week for marriage equality, which means it’s been a rotten week for the National Organization for Marriage. The court loss in Oregon was especially bitter, since NOM had fruitlessly tried to insert itself into the case (and questioned the integrity of the judge in the case, because he’s gay). The court decision in Pennsylvania in favor of marriage only added insult to that injury.

But it’s a lesser known incident in Maine that really threatens to hurt NOM even more. After years of trying to hide the sources of its money, NOM is now facing a record $50,000 in fines for violating state finance law.

At issue is the $2.4 million NOM spent in 2009 on a successful ballot measure to ban same-sex marriage in the state. (Fat lot of good it did; marriage equality was passed by voters just three years later.) NOM contributed about two-thirds of the campaign spending. But NOM refused to reveal the names of its donors, claiming that it was protecting their civil rights.

That did not sit well with the state of Maine, which sought the donors’ names. NOM went to court to keep the names anonymous, losing in a federal court in 2012. The U.S. Supreme Court subsequently refused to review that decision.

NOM continues to insist that it is a “social welfare” organization (although whose welfare is an open question), and as such is exempt from campaign finance disclosures. The Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices is unmoved by NOM’s argument and is recommending the record fine. A final vote by the Commission is scheduled next week.

For an organization dealing with dwindling finances, the fine is certainly unwelcome. More to the point, NOM has now been branded as an unethical organization engaging in illegal campaign finance practices. So much for having the moral high ground on its side.

NOM will undoubtedly keep limping along for a while, unwilling to admit defeat.  But even NOM has its limits. A few more weeks like this, and the organization is essentially done. Those weeks can’t come soon enough.

By:           John Gallagher
On:           May 21, 2014
Tagged: , , , , ,
  • 6 Comments
    • Cam
      Cam

      Why hasn’t the board been arrested for continuing to refuse a court order that was issued years ago? When the U.S. Supreme Court refused to review the case it was done and over for NOM.

      May 21, 2014 at 9:13 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mezaien
      Mezaien

      @Cam: In early 1995 I got blocked from “The Advocate” web site for saying something “BAD” about them. I will never donate money to the HRC or GAYS Couse.

      May 21, 2014 at 9:25 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Dakotahgeo
      Dakotahgeo

      @Mezaien: And I’m sure they will really you… NOT!

      May 21, 2014 at 10:20 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Pix
      Pix

      I remember having to explain to my partner’s kids why the organizations FOR marriage were against me and their mom getting married. As we were going through the East Texas Bible Belt that was just one of many questions that really highlighted the insanity and doublespeak of American society by those who claim to be standing for ethics & moral behavior.

      May 21, 2014 at 9:37 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • toberlin
      toberlin

      I think the Fight for Equal Rights for People who are LGBT is a ETHIC vrs.MORAL Fight worldwide.
      It is not just about the Fight for Marriage Equality or civil and political Rights of sexual Minorities.It is about every Societies Understanding of Democracy and more Freedom for ALL People.
      And I think NOM think the same.More Freedom/Democracy for all People is just not their Thing.

      May 22, 2014 at 8:18 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • toberlin
      toberlin

      Just read trough my comments and try to find the all the”dumb” Things I said:
      German:”nicht nur” =”not just”
      So a Friend of mine just told me that “not only” would be the right /better Translation for “nicht nur” in that context.He said in english it sounds a little like I want to marginalize the Fight of People who are LGBT.And the opposite is the true.I think people who are LGBT often have to fight that hard on the Planet because they have to change Societies to get they Rights.

      May 23, 2014 at 8:05 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • QUEERTY DAILY

     




    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.