Queerty is better as a member
I’ve repeatedly told my liberal AND conservative friends that we will see full marriage equality in the USA within <5 years. This seems to have been given new impetus now that the FEDERAL government has spoken! Even in states where marriage equality is not supported, all married couples will be treated equally even if not married in those recalcitrant states. Great days are coming, and as California Prop 8 proponents found out the hard way… once rights are granted, the government or the people cannot rescind them! Nice, huh?! :-)
As Biden might say — this is a BFD. It effectively nationalizes same-sex marriage. As long as a couple can get themselves to a state where same-sex marriage is legal to obtain a license, then they are married in the eyes of the United States government.
@erikwm: I can just see the conservative extremist christian Taliban just soiling their Depends as this news hits the airwaves, lolol. Well, dam it… they’ve been warned now for year and years so they can’t feign Alzheimer’s Disease! Five years or less, all states will have marriage equality, I
Any step is a step, this is great news!
So, now the IRS is treating “legally married same-sex couples” the same as opposite sex couples for tax purposes (ie: taking money away via taxes), i sure hope EVERY legal team in EVERY STATE where gay marriage is PROHIBITED BY LAW/STATE CONSTITUTION, will add this to their cases to overthrow those laws – and they best do it ASAP!
I mean, how can a state law NOW be legal given the recent SCOTUS rulings AND this ruling? If my high school civics class taught me anything, it’s that FEDERAL LAW trumps state laws – and the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT has spoken.
This should really put full equality on the FAST TRACK – i’m betting by the end of next year!
Equality is inevitable. Equality from Coast to Coast!
@Dakotahgeo: We all know they are full of shit… where else would they deposit it other than their depends?
@Larkin: LOLOL… thank you, Larkin! ROFL…. I have no idea!
@GayTampaCowboy: You’re generally right, but it’s slightly more complicated than that. SCOTUS only said that the federal government couldn’t lawfully refuse to recognize gay marriage. It explicitly reserved the question of state bans for another day.
In all honesty, so much of “law” is just sophistry: if the Fifth Amendment and Equal Protection forbid the federal government from maintaining DOMA, it is beyond illogical to think that the states are free to discriminate under the guise of federalism. At the end of the day, the Court either thinks gays should have the same rights as everyone else, or they don’t. That’s really what they’re deciding.
divorce attorneys are cumming in their panties
Please log in to add your comment.
Need an account? Register It's free and easy.
PHOTOS: Broadway Gets Into Winter Burlesque With Calendar Girl
PHOTOS: Prohibition Returns to NYC With the Roaring New Twenty Something Party
PHOTOS: The Sundance Queer Preview — 2014 Edition
Long, Loose and Colorful: Fashion Trends For 2014
Most Talked About Model Interviews Of 2013