Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
 

UPS Denies NJ Civil Unions

ups-1.jpg
Steve Goldstein warned of this moment.

The New Jersey gay activist knew that The Garden State’s civil union laws left too many loopholes, loopholes United Parcel Service (UPS) has used to withhold health benefits from same-sex couples.

One couple had to learn about New Jersey’s legislative glitch the hard way. Gabriael “Nickie” Brazier and her partner Heather Aurand had hoped for coverage, which would save them a few hundred dollars a month. They didn’t get it.

New Jersey Ledger‘s Robert Schwaneberg reports:

In its letter denying coverage, UPS said it does provide health benefits to its employees’ spouses, including spouses of the same sex who are married in Massachusetts. But it said New Jersey’s decision to recognize same-sex relationships as civil unions rather than marriages tied its hands.

In its letter, UPS said the New Jersey Legislature, in enacting the state’s civil union law, “did not go as far as Massachusetts and afford same-sex couples the ability to marry. Had the New Jersey Legislature done that, you could have added Ms. Aurand as a spouse under the plan.”

The letter concluded that “New Jersey law does not treat civil unions the same as marriages.”

The international courier contends that New Jersey’s civil unions do not qualify as marriage, despite what politicos may say. One of the laws sponsors, Democratic Assemblyman Wilfredo Caraballo, can’t seem to understand UPS’ rationale, We made it clear through the language and the intent that when it came to issues like this, we fully expected civil-unioned couples would be covered. As an international company, UPS explains that its following federal law – or, at least, federal definitions of marriage. That law, however, gives companies the option of weighing civil unions and marriages equally. The inconsistencies between federal and state laws highlight America’s skewed sense of justice, says Goldstein, director of Garden State Equality:

This is a problem the Legislature created. Civil unions are never in our lifetime going to be respected by employers like marriage.

They know it’s a disaster. In the real world, civil unions are to marriage what artificial sweetener is to sugar. It’s not the same thing and it leaves a bad aftertaste.

Rumor has it lawmakers are looking to take the issue up in 2008. Until then, well, keep your Listerine handy.

By:           Andrew Belonksy
On:           Jul 9, 2007
Tagged: , , , ,

  • 5 Comments
    • Dawster
      Dawster

      is it bad that i agree with them?? not in their decision (which is really wrong) but in their analysis of “civil unions”.

      am i completely nuts for thinking that everyone (man, woman, gay, or straight) should be able to go to the courthouse and file the SAME PAPERWORK… no matter who they are.

      i’m trying to figure out if UPS is pro-gay and trying to shift their clout on loopholed legislation that is unfair to gays, or all they just being mean…

      Jul 9, 2007 at 1:47 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Bryan
      Bryan

      It is situations like this that demand that we demand full equality, not “separate but equal” treatment, which is never really equal.

      Jul 9, 2007 at 5:29 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • djtx1
      djtx1

      I had the same question as Dawster – Is UPS being shitty to gays or helping to advance our cause by forcing the civil unions vs. marriage issue? My vibe is leaning towards them really being good guys but I’m not completely convinced. I looked them up on HRC’s latest Equality Index, which rates companies’ gay-friendliness basically. UPS got a score of 80 (out of a possible 100), whereas FedEx only got a 55. BTW, I urge others to use reference sources like this when making decisions about where to spend money. Don’t support businesses that don’t support you! I wanted to buy an mp3 player over the weekend and looked online to see who had the best deals. I found the best prices at Radio Shack and Circuit City but when I looked them up on the Equality Index they both had abysmal scores. Then I looked up Best Buy and found that they had a score of 100!!! So Best Buy got my business. I spent a little more but felt better about it and think I wound up with a better product than I would have if I’d bought any of the sale items at the other two stores. You can read and download the latest HRC Equality Index here:

      http://www.hrc.org/Template.cfm?Section=Get_Informed2&Template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=33909

      Jul 11, 2007 at 10:08 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    FOLLOW US
     



    GET QUEERTY'S DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.