Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
  GOP DEATH WATCH

WATCH: Decoding Romney’s Response To President’s Marriage-Equality Statement

This afternoon, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney held a press conference in Oklahoma City, where he addressed President Obama’s announcement in support of marriage equality. Now, we know CNN cut to him mid-sentence and he was probably answering another question, but given his unemotional demeanor and stiffness, it looked like for a second he was just a robot the GOP programmed with a single response  it was uttering over and over on a loop:

“Between and man and woman… ZZZT! Between a man and woman… ZZT! …man and woman.”

But seriously, did anyone notice how he specifically used the word “preference” in explaining his view on the tender issue of same-sex marriage? Isn’t it Republicans who think gays can change their sexual “preference”? Maybe Mitt is signaling to us that his opinion will change. Like he’s Patty Hearst trying to signal he’s not in cahoots with his captors? We need to get Mitt into some deprogramming!

By:           Dan Avery
On:           May 9, 2012
Tagged: , , , ,
  • 15 Comments
    • No. 1 · iDavid

      He always looks like he’s fresh off the golf course or his yacht. Doesn’t play well for a pres candyass. Other than that he was his flip floppy self, declaring his stance on gay marriage has never changed at least since running for pres. He’d be perfect for a flip flop porn flick. GAG!

      May 9, 2012 at 8:52 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 2 · Zane

      Notice how he says that he’s held the view “since running for office.” That statement could apply to many of Romney’s current political views.

      May 9, 2012 at 9:19 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 3 · tjr101

      Spineless, waffling, bigot, liar, flip flopper, desperate, selfish, devious, malicious. All appropriate descriptions of Mitt Romney.

      May 9, 2012 at 9:26 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 4 · J Stratford

      At least he is not Bachman!

      Seriously, he was probably taken by surprise with Obama’s move. He is a little bit unnerved that Obama took a gambit on this. Now Romney is forced to defend his stance when what he really wants to do is to not talk about it.

      May 9, 2012 at 9:59 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 5 · 1equalityUSA

      Today on the news Strap-the-dog-to-the-roof-Romney said that he is against same sex marriage or anything similar. So that tells me that it is beyond the redefinition of the straights’ sacred ritual (which is a secular, contractual arrangement) and out and out bigotry and discrimination. He said…”Or anything similar.” This Mormon dog abuser needs to go back to the planet Kolob in a big hurry, with his NOM pledge wedged.

      May 9, 2012 at 10:03 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 6 · 1equalityUSA

      Recently, Brian Brown indicated how bad it would be for Obama to come out for same-sex marriage. I thought at the time, this pud doesn’t care about Obama’s political risks…..this wad just doesn’t want Obama to come out for equality. At the time I thought, “anything Brian Brown told me not to do, do the opposite.” The adipose is clogging up the circulation in his brain. Doesn’t he know we gays use both sides of our brains. We have to in this world. That skid-mark must think we just fell off of the turnip truck. Here, three days later, Obama rams NOM sideways. This was never about “marriage.” It was about making hate-dollars off of our community.

      May 9, 2012 at 10:13 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 7 · Red Meat

      Can you imagine the cheer Obama will get at the debates when gay marriage is brought up while Romney chokes? LOL I can’t wait.

      May 10, 2012 at 1:44 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 8 · Curtis

      I think he just looks so awkward because hes starting to realize that he cant win.

      May 10, 2012 at 2:51 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 9 · michael

      Sorry, but the gay pings my gaydar.

      May 10, 2012 at 3:00 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 10 · michael

      Um, guy pings….

      May 10, 2012 at 3:00 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 11 · DouggSeven

      “I’ve had the same view since running for office”. The republicans will be doing a major flip-flop angle. Ugh, I can see the creepily voiced ads now.

      May 10, 2012 at 3:25 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 12 · Larkin

      if you believe marriage should be between a man and a woman, you should also believe that those who aren’t virgins should be stoned to death. Get that bill passed and then we can talk.. how’s that mitt money?

      May 10, 2012 at 8:50 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 13 · Rooney

      Disgusting, cowardly, sadistic bully.

      May 10, 2012 at 10:34 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 14 · Robroberts

      Mitt will lose on this issue; the freedom and equality train just left the station, and Mitt is alone with rhe bigots. Mitt is looking more and more out of step with the American people, and the moral arc of history. Buh bye!

      May 10, 2012 at 11:56 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • No. 15 · Patsy Stoned

      Oh, just ask tomorrow, you’ll get a completely different answer.

      And his hair is looking a bit shaggy. Someone should hold him down and cut it. And give him a wedgie with his magic undies while you do it.

      May 14, 2012 at 12:46 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Queerty now requires you to log in to comment

    Please log in to add your comment.

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.

  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    FOLLOW US
     




    GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2012 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.