Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
  friends + foes

We’re Thrilled Gay Marriage Is Coming to D.C. (But Not Why You’d Expect)

gayscapitolbldg

Well sure, it’s because the homos in our nation’s capital will be able to get married if they want. But more so it’s because of the logistics behind D.C.’s passage of laws. Namely, that Congress has to decide whether it wants to get in on the debate.

The bill — which would change the city’s marriage laws to say “marriage is the legally recognized union of two people” and “any person who otherwise meets the eligibility requirements . . . may marry any other eligible person regardless of gender,” and notes that religious institutions will not be forced to conduct same-sex ceremonies — will be introduced in the coming weeks by gay City Councilman David A. Catania along with 10 co-sponsors. Just in time for Congress’ return from vacation!

It’s expected the measure will score an easy approval from the City Council, which, despite obvious outliers, is saturated with gays support. But the proposed law then enters a review period where Congress can either give it a jock nod and send it on its merry way to becoming the law of the land, or intervene and bring the bill to a full congressional vote so the rest of America’s representiatves can have their say.

And that possibility has us both nervous — and thrilled.

Because it’ll be the first time, in a long time, that we’d get a chance to see exactly where our elected representatives stand on gay rights. With a single yes or no vote on D.C.’s marriage bill, we’d know whether the “on the fence” members of Congress are friends or foes. Do they have our backs? Or are they going to stand behind “the tradition of marriage” and bogus faith convictions to deny equality to the people who live right next to The Capitol?

And from there, we know whether to send ‘em campaign donation checks, or mount an offensive to remove them from office. Not that we’re one-issue type of voters; we just don’t support hatred in office.

Most interestingly, however, is that Catania’s bill has not received a blanket rejection from fellow councilman Marion Barry, the former D.C. mayor who voted for recognition of out-of-state gay marriages before railing against the measure with backing from conservative religious types. Barry says he’ll wait for the bill to be introduced, and then “we’ll see.” We will see, too, Mr. Barry.

What do you think of this post?
LOL (0) WTF (0) Hot (0) More Please (0)
By:           editor editor
On:           Sep 12, 2009
Tagged: , , ,
9 Comments

No. 1 · flippy

Dems bringing this up for a vote would be handing the Republicans a wedge issue on a platter. There’s no way that’s going to happen. It will be allowed to pass without review is my guess.

Posted: Sep 12, 2009 at 5:59 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 2 · Qjersey · Member · 1174 comments

It’s still disgusting that the citizens of DC have no true self governance and that Congress would waste time meddling in local affairs rather than doing the nation’s business.

Posted: Sep 13, 2009 at 7:23 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 3 · spindoc

Marion Barry isn’t opposing this because he got trashed for switching his vote on the other bill. He was threatened by an out of state preacher that they would stir up the people in DC against him if he voted for gay marriage etc… so he switched, and then nobody showed up to the rally, AND a selection of black preachers from around the city wrote letters in support of gay marriage. He got stomped. HA!

Posted: Sep 13, 2009 at 10:24 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 4 · aeblikkon

The votes won’t necessarily correspond to support for gay marriage. For the federal marriage amendment, many Dems voted against because they didn’t want to give the Republicans a political victory, or change the constitution which they considered sacred.

Similarly, I bet there will be arguments about D.C.’s right to home rule from scared Democrats who don’t want to go on the record for supporting gay marriage.

Posted: Sep 13, 2009 at 12:14 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 5 · GAYPETCLUB.com · Member · 8 comments

We’ll continue the fight and vote as needed to assure fairness to all.

Posted: Sep 13, 2009 at 4:37 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 6 · BobinDC

@spindoc: Barry wasn’t threatened by the preachers. He was paid.

Posted: Sep 14, 2009 at 1:31 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 7 · IM PROUD TO ME A LESBIAN (NERIA)

LET ME JUST FIRST CORRECT SOME OF YOU PEOPLE.IF U THINK THAT GAYS/LESBIANS AREN’T GOING TO PUT UP A FIGHT FOR OUR RIGHTS THAT WE SHOULD HAVE ANYWAY U MUST ALSO BELIEVE THAT BUSH WILL BE PRESIDENT AGAIN. WTF ARE THE ODDS TO THAT, REALLY U FUCKING REPUBLICANS MAKE ME ITCH WITH YOUR PURVERIKE WAYS OF THINKIN. DO YOU PEOPLE HAVE BRAIN CELLS? ANYWAY WE WILL STAND TOGETHER AND THEY WILL PASS MARRIAGE FOR US WHETHER YOU PEOPLE LIKE IT OR NOT. I DONT CARE IF THEY PASS IT BECAUSE OF THE GAYS IN OFFICE OOOO THE FUCK WELL THAT JUST MEANS THAT WE AS A COMMUNITY ARE EVERYWHERE. SO FUCK YOU FUCKING HATERS WHO ARE PROBALLY CLOSETED ANYWAY.
SHOUT OUT TO MY RAINBOW FAMILY AROUND THE GLOBE LUV YALL MUUUUUAAAHH

Posted: Dec 16, 2009 at 5:39 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 8 · romeo · Member · 1441 comments

I just love it when the lesbians come in. YOU GO GRRL !!!

Posted: Dec 16, 2009 at 5:59 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 9 · FakeName

Please step away from the caps lock. Repeat, step away from the caps lock!

Posted: Dec 16, 2009 at 6:05 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]

Add your Comment




It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



POPULAR ON QUEERTY

Copyright 2012 Queerty, Inc.
Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.