What Does Maggie Gallagher Think About Anal Sex?
—Maggie Gallagher, the NOM founder who’s branching out into anti-abortion matters, somehow managed to wait this long to turn butt sex into a feminist issue
I seriously doubt anyone could find Maggie’s chocolate starfish under all those layers of lard.
Obviously, Maggie has a rich, fantasy life and never misses a chance to diss “teh gays.”
· Flag
Where’s the original video to this? Can’t find it on YouTube and want to send it to a relative who lives for Maggie-bashing.
And Maggie, aren’t your little lady Evangelical right-wing followers who don’t want to let any man defile her business outside of the marriage bed sort of the queens of anal sex?
· Flag
Where’s Mark? Mark! Mark! Mark!
He should be right along to spout his “ists” and “isms” and tell us we’re being fat-phobics and anti-women.
Mark! Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaark! FOFLMAO!
· Flag
Now Maggie has assumed the right to decide what is pleasant and sexually satisfactory for all women everywhere?
And her medical authority is a Wikipedia article?
Holeeshiat, that woman is just crazytown hijinks. Wow.
· Flag
@Adam: Tell that to the women who actually do engage in anal sex and on average have stronger and more frequent orgasms. In fact, I challenge you to go over to Jezebel.com and ask a bunch of feminist, cisgender women what they think… you might be surprised.
· Flag
There ain’t a man — gay or straight, on planet Earth, who would go anywhere near this revolting bitch’s butthole.
· Flag
It’s been proven that most homophobia (I know that’s not quite the point of this story) is based on a “revulsion” of gay sex. And that revulsion is, to put it short, based on a severe insecurity of ones’ own body and sexuality, and emotional immaturity. People like Maggie essentially fixate on things like anal sex because of her own internalized discomfort. She sees having anal as a loss of control and we all know Maggie and those like her are all about control.
· Flag
How does she know that the anus wasn’t designed for sex? Was she there when it evolved? Or when jeebus or booboohaga, or whatever her god is, designed it? How does she know it’s not not a multipurpose organ? Does she know better than the creator? Why would a kind and loving god make a prostate so damn pleasurable when it get banged around a little if it wasn’t supposed to get banged around a little?
And BTW, if you are a clean person with a decent diet and good hygiene.. if you can get a partner who cares about your emotional and physical comfort as much as his own, then there is very little risk of poopoo caka or tearing. Of course, I doubt that she has a good diet, good hygiene, or has ever had a loving fuck.
· Flag
I urge Maggie, Brian Brown, and all the other folks at NOM to start wearing brown ribbons pinned over their anuses, that say “I’ve sworn off anal sex”. She can have a bus tour, and get everyone at their rallies to take the pledge, “No more butt fucking for me.” They can hand out their literature at airports with the Scientologists and LaRouche folks. Maybe she will be successful to get Michelle Bachman, Ann Coulter, and GOProud to join this fight for rectitude. Once a year, they can present the highest honor, the Santorum Prize, for the persons who have remained anal abstinent since the last year’s awards. If they keep busy enough on this, maybe they will forget about marriage.
PS- will someone find Maggie’s husband, Mr Maggie, and interview him on this subject.Did he forget to use a little crisco before plowing her in the back door?
· Flag
Pregnancy “is painful, unsanitary, unsatisfying for women and creates unique risks for serious physical diseases”
Pregnancy, and the health risks associated with it, have been the leading cause of death in women for most of human history.
Heterosexual intercourse leads, without interference, to pregnancy.
So save the lives of women: ban heterosexual marriage.
· Flag
@DavyJones: @Bill: If you disagree with her, then explain why you disagree. From a feminist (and health) standpoint, yes, it is a premise that can be argued.
I don’t like her any more than you, but trying to attack me just because I see the logic in her argument only makes you and other gays look like children. I don’t have to be against everything a person says simply to be against them, which is something that you need to learn.
· Flag
the design analogy is lame, my ear canal was not designed for my ear bud headphones. but that doesn’t cause moral frenzy. and similarly carries a health risk but we don’t freight it ’round with hysteria…dressed up as safety advice.
that said i’m a complete pussy. anal terrifies me. tried it twice. THAT SHIT FUCKING HURTS! and from what little experience i have of gay porn, the bottoms haven’t had wood? whats with that, isn’t it pleasurable?
i’ve also tried giving it twice and with the second guy there was some blood. not like field-hospital-in-’nam-blood. but still.
besides i just never have the urge to lay the pipe through the sewer. not that i have any moral objection. but it does probably mean my dating pool is limited :-(
and it risks guys thinking i’m inhibited. or religous nut.
i hope i’m not missing out. but i can’t imagine it could bring any more intimacy than, say, oral, or 69 (mmm). oh and kissing. kissing is best of all :-)
[cynically ends on a sweet note so you wont hate on him]
· Flag
the design analogy is lame, my ear canal was not designed for my ear bud headphones. but that doesn’t cause moral frenzy. and similarly carries a health risk but we don’t freight it ’round with hysteria…dressed up as safety advice.
that said i’m a complete pussy. anal terrifies me. tried it twice. THAT SH*T FUCKING HURTS! and from what little experience i have of gay porn, the bottoms haven’t had wood? whats with that, isn’t it pleasurable?
i’ve also tried giving it twice and with the second guy there was some blood. not like field-hospital-in-’nam-blood. but still.
besides i just never have the urge to lay the pipe through the sewer. not that i have any moral objection. but it does probably mean my dating pool is limited :-(
and it risks guys thinking i’m inhibited. or religous nut.
i hope i’m not missing out. but i can’t imagine it could bring any more intimacy than, say, oral, or 69 (mmm). oh and kissing. kissing is best of all :-)
[cynically ends on a sweet note so you wont hate on him]
· Flag
he design analogy is lame, my ear canal was not designed for my ear bud headphones. but that doesn’t cause moral frenzy. and similarly carries a health risk but we don’t freight it ’round with hysteria…dressed up as safety advice.
that said i’m a complete p*ssy. anal terrifies me. tried it twice. THAT SHIT FUCKING HURTS! and from what little experience i have of gay porn, the bottoms haven’t had wood? whats with that, isn’t it pleasurable?
i’ve also tried giving it twice and with the second guy there was some blood. not like field-hospital-in-’nam-blood. but still.
besides i just never have the urge to lay the pipe through the sewer. not that i have any moral objection. but it does probably mean my dating pool is limited :-(
and it risks guys thinking i’m inhibited. or religous nut.
i hope i’m not missing out. but i can’t imagine it could bring any more intimacy than, say, oral, or 69 (mmm). oh and kissing. kissing is best of all :-)
[cynically ends on a sweet note so you wont hate on him]
· Flag
about 42
OUT OF ALL THAT “PROFANITY” IN THAT POST THE FUCKING WORD P*SSY GETS ME BLOCKED.
GET A GRIP QUEERTY!
ARE YOU SCARED A COUPLE OF KINSEY 6″S WILL FAINT AWAY. LETS TRY AN EXPERIMENT:
P*SSY!
P*SSY!
P*SSY!
ANYTHING BAD HAPPEN? DID THE RAPTUER COME?
SERIOUSLY QWEERTY YOUR-THROW-A-SIX-TO-START MOD RULES HAVE TO BE SORTED OUT
TREAT US LIKE ADULTS.
· Flag
How would 300lbs. lard ass Maggie Gallagher know about anal sex?
Was this her personal experience?