Just sayin’. Now call me a racist.

Did you also bother to look up “heterosexual”?

“Of, or having desire for those of the opposite sex.” You will notice, there is no age qualifier. You will also note that the hetscontinue to bring up pedophilia, etc. It seems to be an obsession with them (you?).

I looked up ‘homosexual’ and it says:

‘feeling or involving sexual attraction to people of one’s own sex’.

No mention of any age qualifiers.

No tap-dancing by some gay shrink.

Sorry.

“Another problem related to terminology arises because sexual abuse of male children by adult men is often referred to as “homosexual molestation.” The adjective “homosexual” (or “heterosexual” when a man abuses a female child) refers to the victim’s gender in relation to that of the perpetrator. Unfortunately, people sometimes mistakenly interpret it as referring to the perpetrator’s sexual orientation.

To avoid this confusion, it is preferable to refer to men’s sexual abuse of boys with the more accurate label of male-male molestation. Similarly, it is preferable to refer to men’s abuse of girls as male-female molestation. These labels are more accurate because they describe the sex of the individuals involved but don’t implicitly convey unwarranted assumptions about the perpetrator’s sexual orientation
“

Perhaps you should call and tell them, I’m sure they would enjoy a good laugh.

Look, you are entitled to your own opinion. But, you are not entitled to your own facts. The fact is that most pedophiles are married, white, male heterosexuals whether you like it or not.

Put on your party hat Yeson8Won and start the celebration…

Bye Stevie, don’t forget to pout and fold your arms after you slam the door sunshine!

‘feeling or involving sexual attraction to people of one’s own sex’.

No mention of any age qualifiers. Sorry.

I guess your side hasn’t had time to re-write the Oxford dictionary to suit your agenda yet!

A homosexual blaming everyone else for his faults??

Surely not??

How unusual!

We are no better and no worse than heterosexuals. Criminal behavior has no orientation. But your ignorance is quite amusing.

Plus, you need to do a little more research. It is well documented that the sexual orientation of the molester is NOT based on the gender of the children he molests. It is based on the gender of the ADULT relationships he participates in.

Molesting children is about POWER in the same way that rape is about POWER. It isn’t about sexual orientation.

As I said, the majority of child molesters are middle-aged, white, male, MARRIED heterosexuals. Look it up if you don’t believe me. You are on a computer after all.

We homosexuals are angry because your type made us this way.
Cog

I agree with DGZ. Im not talking with you anymore, Mr or Ms yeson8won. Youre nothing in my life but in the way of progress. goodbye

Shouldn’t you be trying to lead by example?

Because they all require a redefinition of marriage, which the majority of Americans find unacceptable.

To make child marriage legal the pedophiles only need to get the age of consent reduced. Think it will never happen? That’s what people thought about homosexual marriage.

And any male who molests another male is a homosexual by definition.

Whats your problem with that?? You cant control with whom I have sex and you cant control my relationship, and it fucking drives you right wing nuts crazy.

Whether you like it or not I AM MARRIED. get the Fuck over it, cog. Go get a divorce that what you straights love to do.

But I value the importance of marriage and the family, as do most Americans.

We cannot stand idly by and see marriage violated and devalued by redefining it for homosexuals. polygamists, bestialists etc.

Go blow up an abortion clinic or better yet shoot an abortionist. Now there’s some important work…

“Should marriage be redefined to accommodate homosexuals”
Yes
No

Hopefully Brown will be gone next year and we can have a state AG who understands his job is to carry out the wishes of We The People, not We The Homosexuals.

In a surprising admission, a key leader of the No on 8 campaign has said publicly for the first time that if the homosexual community pursues a new ballot initiative in 2010, “we’re going to lose.”

Kate Kendall, Executive Director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights and a member of the No on 8 executive committee told a prominent Bay Area gay newspaper that public polls, including the recently published Field Poll, overstate support for gay marriage.

“People lie,” she said. “We’re at 42 percent or 43 percent. We could claw our way to 48 percent but we never get past 48 percent.”

Kendall, who told the Bay Area Reporter that she does not plan to play a leadership role in the next campaign, said that it will take time beyond 2010 for the gay community to mount the kind of public education effort necessary to convince voters to support same-sex marriage.

“The 64 million dollar question is when do we go back. No doubt if we lose in court, the only relief is to repeal Prop 8 at the ballot…[H]aving gone through the draining, rigorous Prop 8 campaign I have a better inkling of what it is going to take and in this economy, I worry that we still do not see enough of actual public education conversations that have to happen. We just haven’t had enough time.”

This rush to overturn Prop. 8 next year is foolish. There may very well be a shift in attitudes between now and then, but we shouldn’t assume that it’ll be enough to sway 3% of voters who opposed marriage equality in November over to our camp.

And I concur with the argument that the other side will be redoubling their efforts as well.

Also, I’m not convinced that pro-equality numbers aren’t artificially high in public opinion polls. I have a feeling a lot of Californians who tell pollsters they’re pro-gay marriage would actually go the other way in the privacy of the voting booth.

It *does* occur to some people that the other side will be redoubling their efforts with the next proposition as well, doesn’t it?