Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
sex surveys

Where Are America’s Uncut Men Hooding Out?

Florida, California, New York, and New Mexico — all states without gay marriage! — are among Amerca’s foreskinniest states, according to Manhunt.net users who list their scalpel status. Not far behind: Massachusetts, Washington D.C., and Texas, while Iowa, Delaware, and Wisconsin, and Michigan are the states with the least amount of coverage.

The basic rule of mushroom: If you’re into uncut guys, move someplace with higher populations of men of color.

By:           Ryan Tedder
On:           Jul 29, 2010
Tagged: , ,
  • 96 Comments
    • Tallskin
      Tallskin

      “The basic rule of mushroom: If you’re into uncut guys, move someplace with higher populations of men of color.”

      Balls! Move to Europe.

      Jul 29, 2010 at 4:32 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS
      PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS

      @Tallskin: 100% Co-Sign….I did Europe recently (literally :-p). I am used to almost all hispanic guys here in the US I have met being of the uncut variety. It was a real shock that while sampling the local goods in Eurpoe I saw blond haired blue eyed boys who somehow ducked the black and decker pecker wrecker………

      Jul 29, 2010 at 4:45 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mr. Enemabag Jones
      Mr. Enemabag Jones

      are among Amerca’s foreskinniest states

      I LOL’d.

      Jul 29, 2010 at 5:12 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Stephen
      Stephen

      I’m Hispanic, and I’m cut. While I agree to some extent with PlaysWellWithOthers, I’ve found that whether or not a fellow Hispanic man is uncut depends very heavily on an intersection of childhood religious affiliation and socioeconomic status.

      Jul 29, 2010 at 5:23 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Xtincta
      Xtincta

      UGH I hate Uncuttys, Know I know what states to avoid.

      Jul 29, 2010 at 5:27 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • adman
      adman

      @Stephen: What’s hooter than a cut and handsome Hispanic man? I ask you, is that not male nudity at it’s finest?

      Jul 29, 2010 at 5:31 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • BenR
      BenR

      The reason it’s predominantly white American men who are circumcised is that circumcision never occurred among gentiles until the Victorian era in England. In those days the English thought that circumcision would prevent “unnatural” sexual deviance such as masturbation. Although English in origin, the practice translated easily from Victorian culture to English-speaking white American culture, which tended to share the same religious values. The rest of Europe and the majority of Christian cultures, including Latin America, simply never adopted the practice.

      Jul 29, 2010 at 5:52 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Oh boy
      Oh boy

      States with high Latin American immigration. Not surprising.

      Jul 29, 2010 at 5:56 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Ian
      Ian

      Here’s a hoot: http://foreskinman.com/index.htm

      Jul 29, 2010 at 6:20 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Devon
      Devon

      @Xtincta:

      Amen.

      Jul 29, 2010 at 6:43 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • REVEMUPMAN
      REVEMUPMAN

      All the men who hate uncut guys.

      SEND THEM TO ME FOR INTERVIEWS ASAP!

      Jul 29, 2010 at 7:10 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Black Pegasus
      Black Pegasus

      I get physically SICK to my Stomach
      at the sight of a Uncut Dick!!

      Ugh!!

      Jul 29, 2010 at 7:23 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Ian
      Ian

      @Black Pegasus: You remind me of the str8 guys who are only attracted to women with eating disorders. In other words, your viewpoint is…….skewed to say the least.

      Jul 29, 2010 at 7:40 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Richie616
      Richie616

      Interesting.

      Jul 29, 2010 at 8:37 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Toby
      Toby

      @BenR:

      The reason why the US became largely uncut is because of WW I. Soldiers were getting infections because of the poor hygiene conditions.

      Well when the soldiers got back, they wanted their boys to look like them so…they had it done to them.

      SO, as far as the US is concerned, it had nothing to do with religion or suppressing sex…but believe it or not, hygiene.

      I’ll tell you this much, boy did it save straight folks here from the AIDS epidemic.

      Jul 29, 2010 at 9:33 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • MMDD
      MMDD

      There’s nothing more beautiful or mouthwatering than a natural penis. I live in Tennessee and consider myself very, very lucky to have married an uncircumcised man who was born and raised in the same state. Here’s a pic of him:

      http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Y5QwQPA610M/SyUEh8bxOAI/AAAAAAAAAxI/-bwlt04e9mE/s1600-h/post-orgasmic04.jpg

      Jul 29, 2010 at 9:36 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Toby
      Toby

      @Toby:

      Ooops, I meant largely cut…all this penis talk is confusing me :)

      Jul 29, 2010 at 9:41 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Nathan
      Nathan

      You folks do know that it’s like 50/50 in Canada right? I’m white, and I only knew/saw one cut guy before I went to university. Even then, it was mostly the Muslim boys.

      Jul 29, 2010 at 10:26 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • 7
      7

      @Stephen: I’m Hispanic, and uncut, parents Roman Catholic and pretty well-off. What exactly is your point about religion and class?

      Jul 29, 2010 at 10:43 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Marcus
      Marcus

      I’m an uncut white male in one of those light blue states. My grandfather was born in Europe and the lack of precedent kept me intact I guess. I’ve been a little self conscious over it ever since I saw a Sex and the City in which all the women freaked out over one (and those broads got around too) but I was happy to find out when I came out that there seems to be an audience for it. I always refer to it as a slingback since it rests below the dick head. Too much information? Probably.

      Jul 30, 2010 at 1:49 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • gregnsf
      gregnsf

      @Black Pegasus: It’s a cultural taboo for some. Even though it is the NATURAL state.
      I’m sure there are lots of heterosexual men in the Middle East and North Africa who are sickened by the sight of a woman who hasn’t had her clitoris cut out too. Anothre cultural thing.

      Jul 30, 2010 at 2:40 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • sebastian
      sebastian

      I can never understand why circumcision is so popular amongst white guys in the States. It’s a form of mutilation. Unless you have a horrendously tight foreskin, you don’t need to have it removed.

      Jul 30, 2010 at 4:25 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Nick Farben
      Nick Farben

      The USA is one of the few developed countries where circumcision is pervasive. Circumcision is rare in Europe, Latin America, Asia and Australia. Countries like Spain & Denmark are only 1~2% circumcised.

      Circumcision is common in some African countries (e.g. Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria) and religious or conservative countries (e.g. Philippines, South Korea, Iran)

      The opinion of circumcision is very low in many developed countries because there has been no evidence that it helps inhibit the spread of STI’s and HIV there, and the risk involved in the medical procedure are unjustifiable.

      Take this quote from BBC Health’s website for instance:
      “In the UK, routine circumcision isn’t thought to be medically necessary. This is because the risks associated with having a surgical procedure that involves a general anaesthetic and the possible postoperative complications outweigh any possible medical benefits.” – Dr Rob Hicks

      As for preferences, people will tend to go with what they know, so it’s not surprising that most Caucasian Americans (90% cut) prefer a cut penis. If you went over to Europe, Australia, Brazil, etc, you’d be a minority.

      Jul 30, 2010 at 6:32 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • MMDD
      MMDD

      There’s nothing more beautiful or mouthwatering than a natural penis. I live in Tennessee and consider myself very, very lucky to have married an uncircumcised man who was born and raised in the same state.

      Jul 30, 2010 at 6:44 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Adrian
      Adrian

      it’s amazing how a little skin can get people talking. I’m going to bring up this topic at the next house party I attend.
      Thanks Queerty and Manhunt.

      Jul 30, 2010 at 10:20 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Stephen
      Stephen

      You’re assuming a lot just from the statement I made, 7. It’s actually Protestant Hispanics that tend to be cut, and Roman Catholic ones that I think are less likely to be so.

      But yes, the more money your parents have, the more likely they are to aspire to some middle-class bourgeois ideal of what a boy should be – i.e. circumcised. There will be exceptions, as in your case, but these are broad tendencies that are very noticeable.

      Jul 30, 2010 at 10:31 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mr. Enemabag Jones
      Mr. Enemabag Jones

      I read an article in the eighties wherein a doctor, who “specialized” in circumcisions, stated that he had many immigrants come to him looking for circucisions, because they beleived that getting one automatically made you a legal citizen of the USA. Sadly, he didn’t discourage this inaccuracy.

      Jul 30, 2010 at 10:39 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • DCBoy
      DCBoy

      I can never understand why circumcision is so popular amongst white guys in the States
      @sebastian:

      Its not a question of popularity among white guys but of popularity by their parents.

      Jul 30, 2010 at 10:45 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Blaine Ward
      Blaine Ward

      What’s all this shit of attacking someone just because he perfers cut or uncut? Grow up! So what if one guy prefers cut and naother guy prefers uncut? It’s their own personal taste and their own damn business! I prefer cut. So what??!! It ain’t gonna stop the world from going round and round! Geez!

      Jul 30, 2010 at 10:58 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Jeffree
      Jeffree

      This is worth saying, but may seem o.b.v.i.o.u.s: Those of us who got c’sized had no choice in the matter. Sad.fact is that the parents of many of us guys who got “cut” didn’t realize they didnt have to say “yes”.

      Time was then that if the doctor said do “X”, it happened. There was’nt time to discuss.

      Jul 30, 2010 at 11:05 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Wes B
      Wes B

      I almost had myself cut at age 19. I was tired of being one of the only two people I knew that were uncut. I didn’t go through with the operation for various reasons not under my control. I later found a person in MS that was uncut and who introduced me to others in the area. It helped me deal with the issue. After moving to the Atlanta area, I have met a few others who have been helpful in learning to love the fact that I am uncut. It may seem a bit weird, but it takes some men almost a lifetime to understand the benefits of having foreskin and to learn it is a thing of natural beauty.

      Jul 30, 2010 at 11:19 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jeff r
      jeff r

      @ Stephen. I’m a Miamian and I disagree with your premise. I know a number of Protestant/non-Roman Catholic men who are intact. I also know a large number of professional, wealthy, educated, sophisticate, assimilated Hispanics/Latins whose sons have remained intact. I don’t think that said “broad tendancies” are that broad or that noticeable. At least not in Miami. I cannot speak for other regions of the country where Hispanics/Latins remain discriminated against, exploited and unappreciated. I also think that No.7 didn’t misinterpret your initial statement. The clear implication, imo, was that the better educated a Hispanic/Latin man was, the more likely that he would be circumsised. Not necessarily the case in Miami.

      I’ve been told by various doctors that the reason that many of the Hispanic/Latin men who are not intact were circumcised is due in large part to the fact that circumcision was standard operating procedure in most hospitals for years, including Miami. I also understand that now most if not all insurance companies are now treating the procedure as an elective and not subsidizing the same so that the practice is slowly becoming less popular. I do know a few people who are a bit “bourgeois” and pretentious and opted for circumcision based upon the same. Unfortunately I believe that most U.S. parents have never really intelligently considered the alternative when their sons are subjected to genital mutilation. If the human body is one of Nature’s works of art, why is circumcision so blithely administered without informed consent?!?

      To those who prefer circumcised men, great. Life is all about diversity, no? To each his own. Let’s not get childish about it.

      I do find it a bit hypocritical that so many are appalled by female circumcision – rightly so, in my opinion – and yet blithely ignore male circumcision. What’s good for the goose should be good for the gander, no? Wouldn’t it be wiser to allow young men to decide the issue for themselves when they reach the age of consent. This seems to be the case for other elective surgeries: implants, etc. Is foreskin a birth defect? I don’t think so. If it is, then every male is born defective.

      In terms of alleged hygenic issues, I’ve never been hygenically challenged in any encounters with an intact guy nor have any of my other numerous friends. There have been far more instances of encountering hygenically challenged women than men in the workplace, social gatherings, etc. Just sayin/

      @Toby. I would hope that those who avoided serio-converting did so because they used condoms and practiced safe sex. Your comment is incredibly insipid.
      Best,
      Jeff R

      Jul 30, 2010 at 2:42 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Stephen
      Stephen

      That was a bit rambling, Jeff R. You may be right that Miami has a different profile in this respect, but I still stand by my earlier comment – my experiences in both Texas and California seem to validate it.

      Jul 30, 2010 at 3:18 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • M&D
      M&D

      There’s nothing more beautiful or mouthwatering than a natural penis. I live in Tennessee and consider myself very, very lucky to have married an uncircumcised man who was born and raised in the same state.

      Jul 30, 2010 at 6:01 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Alex
      Alex

      I had no idea there were jews in New Mexico.

      Jul 30, 2010 at 6:48 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Kathy
      Kathy

      I’m a woman. I would love to find an uncut guy, it’s natural! I think cut penises are ugly and weird. Too bad I can’t find uncut guys where I live who’s straight for that matter…

      Jul 30, 2010 at 8:40 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Brewster
      Brewster

      Foreskin rights NOW!

      Jul 30, 2010 at 9:33 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Sergio Florez
      Sergio Florez

      All those that hate the uncut man-get used to it! There is an influx of Latins from South America through and up to Mexico coming into the U.S.A., the culture of not circumcising will become the norm. 95% of Latin men are uncircumcised (their financial class and religion doesn’t matter). A large majority of women will have had their mouths on an uncut cheesey penis and will eventually french kiss the haters, so you will have had a taste of an uncut man! Ha Ha.

      Jul 31, 2010 at 12:42 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Sergio Florez
      Sergio Florez

      To all the haters of the uncut man-get used to it! There is an influx of Latins coming from South America through and up to Mexico into the U.S.A.,bringing the culture of not circumcising with them. 95%-all ages of Latin men and boys are not circumcised(fincancial class or religion has no influence on the 5%). American women will have or had their mouths on an uncut cheesey penis and will eventually french kiss these haters, so they will have tasted an uncut cock! Ha Ha.

      Jul 31, 2010 at 1:01 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • MMDD
      MMDD

      There’s nothing more beautiful or mouthwatering than a natural male organ. I live in Tennessee and consider myself very, very lucky to have married an uncircumcised man who was born and raised in the same state.

      Jul 31, 2010 at 12:19 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • MMDD
      MMDD

      @Wes B: “It may seem a bit weird, but it takes some men almost a lifetime to understand the benefits of having foreskin and to learn it is a thing of natural beauty.”

      That’s really a shame too. It’s taken me years of positive reinforcement to convince my husband that his foreskin is not something he should be ashamed of or embarrassed about. It shouldn’t be that way, especially in today’s culture.

      Jul 31, 2010 at 12:29 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Tallskin
      Tallskin

      God, you Americans and your hatred of uncut cocks and your fear of the delights of the smell of an uncut cock

      Still, i suppose that’s logical in a country that produces food with no flavour and beer with no alcohol in it.

      Jul 31, 2010 at 4:22 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • MMDD
      MMDD

      @Tallskin: Hey, don’t generalize all of us that way. I’m as American as apple pie, and I absolutely LOVE the look, feel, smell, and taste of an uncut man. There are plenty other Americans who do too.

      Your food and alcohol comments deserve no response.

      Jul 31, 2010 at 4:31 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Tallskin
      Tallskin

      MMDD, “Your food and alcohol comments deserve no response.”

      -that’s because their spot on accurate

      But i take your point that YOU like uncut cocks, but please do witness the comments above that show a real fear of uncut cocks.

      Jul 31, 2010 at 4:47 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • MMDD
      MMDD

      @Tallskin: You’re witnessing a FEW comments by a FEW people. A few do not represent the whole.

      And someone who doesn’t know the difference between “their” and “they’re” can hardly brag about his own “spot on” accuracy.

      Jul 31, 2010 at 4:55 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Tallskin
      Tallskin

      Pff, ok I take the grammatical correction on the chin, like a proper englishman!

      My excuse is that I was writing quickly!

      Jul 31, 2010 at 5:03 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • ron
      ron

      In my many years as an out gay man, I’ve had every kind, color, shape, thickness, length cock there is. And you know what? It’s all good!

      Jul 31, 2010 at 5:05 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Tallskin
      Tallskin

      However, without wishing to be too insulting to you yanks, I have to say that i think there is a connection between too much deodorant and cut cocks and your food that lacks flavour (and your beer with no alcohol in it).

      Is this a fear of “flavour” ?

      Discuss in 1,500 words, and have your essays on my desk by first thing Monday morning.

      Jul 31, 2010 at 5:09 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • ron
      ron

      oh yeah, I also have had several Englishmen and a couple Scotsmen. Don’t make me regret it……

      Jul 31, 2010 at 5:13 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • ewe
      ewe

      @Tallskin: Look who is calling the kettle black. England where i assume you are pontificating from is notorious for shitty food. Grip reality and make a visit girlfriend. We have the most diverse people and food in the world here.

      Aug 2, 2010 at 10:36 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • ewe
      ewe

      @Tallskin: You are thinking to quickly too. Have you heard of a little island called Manhattan or that other “plain” peninsula where San Francisco is situated. I could not even get a fucking ice cube in London in the dead of summer. Spare me.

      Aug 2, 2010 at 10:41 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • MissLaWandaIsBack
      MissLaWandaIsBack

      I have a new clitoris, made with my former foreskin, and I am happy as a clam!

      Aug 2, 2010 at 1:14 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • gregnsf
      gregnsf

      @ tallskin: I wouldn’t brag about food in my native country if that country was ENGLAND!

      Aug 2, 2010 at 8:32 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Jon Bon Jovi
      Jon Bon Jovi

      LOL LOL

      Aug 2, 2010 at 9:04 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Wade@MacMorrighan.Net
      Wade@MacMorrighan.Net

      @sebastian: Also, the foreskin has, like, 4x more sexual nerve endings than the head of the penis; but, when it’s removed, a callused tissue covers the glans reducing one’s pleasure by about 90% which continues throughout a man’s life! WHY, may I ask, isn’t anyone telling new parents-to-be this? Hell, I have actually told some str8 women, and they look at me off, only to say, “Oh, no way! That *can’t* be true!”

      Incidentally, I have encountered in my years an awful LOT of white uncut men in Iowa…most of my lovers have all been uncut, or partially circed.

      Aug 3, 2010 at 1:01 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Ryan Martin
      Ryan Martin

      @Nick Farben: The World Health Organization (WHO; 2007), the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS; 2007), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC; 2008) all agree that male circumcision greatly reduces the risk of becoming infected with HIV by men, at least during penile/vaginal sex. Numerous other studies show it also cuts the rate of penile cancer significantly. There’s a reason the ancient Hebrews did it.

      Aug 8, 2010 at 10:17 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Hugh7
      Hugh7

      @56 – Ryan Martin. This is called the fallacy of Appeal to Authority. WHO, UNAIDS and the CDC have been sadly misled in this case, by some people with a barrow to push – or should that be, an axe to grind? The non-blinded, non-placebo-controlled studies claiming protection against AIDs ignore a number of important factors. Other studies show it INcreases the risk of transmission from men to women.

      Penile cancer is so rare it’s hard to get good statistics, rarer than male breast cancer, rarer in non-cutting Denmark than the US. More than 1000 circumcisions would be wasted to protect one man against it.

      If there is a reason the ancient Hebrews did it, it was certainly not to protect against AIDS or penile cancer (most ancient Hebrews died long before they had any chance of contracting that old man’s disease) and the risks of tribal circumcision are much greater.

      Aug 18, 2010 at 2:49 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • TampaZeke
      TampaZeke

      @Ryan Martin: Then perhaps you can explain why America has higher rates of EVERY STD, AIDS AND penile cancer than ANY European country.

      You’re pointing to studies that were done with the intention of proving their premise.

      Common sense and a casual look at STD, AIDS and penile cancer rates in America and Europe show your claims to be bogus.

      By the way, penile cancer kills about 8 people in America every year. Honestly, look it up. And it’s VERY likely that most of the 8 were circumcised.

      Aug 27, 2010 at 12:29 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • chris
      chris

      honestly, I’m a gay man with an uncut penis. It’s bad enough that I didn’t choose to be gay BUT I definitely did not choose to be uncut either. Everyone I talk to tells me how disgusting it is to be uncut and honestly it makes me stray away from relationships because if I should get intimate with a partner, I don’t want to disappoint them because of it. Like it may not seem like a big deal to those that are cut, but to me and probably many others who aren’t cut in the us, it can really suck. On top of that, I feel like gay men in general can be pickier in the physicality of their partners and it’s a lot harder to find a gay man (for me anyways…) who can look at an uncut penis and not be disappointed.

      Sep 4, 2010 at 3:23 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • MMDD
      MMDD

      @chris: Chris,

      First of all, it’s a GOOD thing that you’re gay, and it’s a GOOD thing that you’re uncut. Yes, some gay men tend to be overly picky and shallow, but those are not the kind of guys you’d want to date in the first place. Believe me, there are plenty gay guys out there (like me!) who PREFER an uncut man over a cut man. Be proud of the fact that you are a NATURAL man. That alone is very attractive. Anyone who makes you feel otherwise isn’t worth the time of day.

      And for all those people who are telling you how “disgusting” it is to be uncut, do some research and show them that they are wrong. Sounds like they need some serious education anyway.

      Sep 11, 2010 at 9:33 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Brad
      Brad

      @chris: awwwwwwwwwwww I’m so sorry you have to deal with shitheads like that. I am cut and I happen to hate it. Hate it so much I went into a deep depression. I would say don’t ever do it. It is an ignorant and stupid procedure. I happen to have a preference for intact men. As a bi guy I have never had attraction to cut cocks and believe me I have tried. So really its nothing to be ashamed of. I feel bad that you have had to deal with such bullshit.

      Sep 17, 2010 at 1:16 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Chris
      Chris

      Well, I may have been a tad melodramatic when I posted my first post, but honestly, I read online that Hugh Hefner, Elvis, Pierce Brosnan,Daniel Radcliffe, and Robert Pattinson, several Kennedy’s, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and Pope John Paul II were all uncut, so I guess my penis follows in great footsteps.

      Sep 19, 2010 at 3:29 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • ewe
      ewe

      @Marcus: Well hello there. wink wink

      Sep 24, 2010 at 1:35 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • ewe
      ewe

      i like beefcake wrapped or unwrapped myself. I haven’t had a type in decades.

      Sep 24, 2010 at 1:37 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • MMDD
      MMDD

      @Chris: It certainly does, Chris! :-)

      Oct 4, 2010 at 9:53 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • brent
      brent

      Mutilation is the cutting/removal of a healthy part of the body. Circumcision falls under that, does it not?

      Oct 25, 2010 at 7:43 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • John
      John

      wait, why would that be shocking? Europe knows better.
      Only America, Korea and the Philippines do it for non-religious reasons and in America it’s down to around 50% nationwide and falling.

      Nov 13, 2010 at 4:34 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • John
      John

      @Brad: Dude! I read your post like I wrote it. Uncut rules and it’s the norm in the world. Circumcision is borne of ignorance. Even so, we shouldn’t knock the cut guys, because it’s almost never their fault (can you imagine choosing to get cut? LOL). They should know better than to repeat the process though.

      Nov 13, 2010 at 4:36 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • ReCovered
      ReCovered

      The attitudes expressed here that are against intact penises are largely due to arrogant male attitudes. Most men do not want to admit that there is something wrong with them, especially when it has to do with their perceived center of their manhood: Their penis. They go on saying that it’s fine and that they evenlike it better. But they know no different. Conformity has entrenched these false make stereotypes into some sort of normalcy when, in fact, nothing can be more normal than intactness. Remember; We lie best when we lie to ourselves.

      Dec 28, 2010 at 9:48 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Tom
      Tom

      Uncut cocks are ugly and they stink. There’s no debating it–they are vile and a real turn off–YUCK!!!! GROSS!!

      Jan 10, 2011 at 6:51 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • MMDD
      MMDD

      @Tom: You’re obviously confusing uncut cocks with yourself. I guess that happens to dickheads from time to time.

      Jan 10, 2011 at 6:58 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Vicki
      Vicki

      I too would like to find an UNCUT man!!!! I live in Iowa…yeah u see that map? I am soo staying single!

      Feb 22, 2011 at 12:28 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Steve
      Steve

      Reading threads like this one just makes me so happy that I’m not American! What a fucked up country…

      Jul 15, 2011 at 5:43 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Kieran
      Kieran

      Gay guy here who loves uncut – whereabouts are you?

      Jan 14, 2012 at 6:23 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Alex, UK
      Alex, UK

      @ Tallskin LOLLLL!!!!!!!

      Jan 14, 2012 at 8:23 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mike UK
      Mike UK

      @Tom: uncut cocks only stink on those who don’t wash! leave the sleeve! plus it saves a fortune on lube when you have a wank! ;)

      Jan 14, 2012 at 8:44 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Alex
      Alex [Different person #1 using similar name]

      I agree Stephen this is true not only for Hispanics born in the USA,but Hispanics born in Latin America.Social class would affect a man’s circumcision status.In those countries in North America:Mexico,Guatemala and El Salvador; closest to the USA most of upper class males are circumcised.

      As far a those Hispanics born in the USA I would say that those born prior to 1980s,a lot of parents had no chice in teh matter and were routinarly circumcised like all others:white,black,or Chinese.So I would say 50/50 or 40/60 for them? Now after th3 90 it seems that male circumcision rates in the Western USA have decresed because parents are having more choices and for many not just Hispanics,but Asians,Native AMericans,etc it is not part of their culture

      Jan 15, 2012 at 3:22 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Alex
      Alex [Different person #1 using similar name]

      Hi Guys wouldn’t logically Miami be the city in the USA with the most foreskins? It seems like a boatload of foreskins comes in everyday.

      Jan 15, 2012 at 3:27 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Alex
      Alex [Different person #1 using similar name]

      Hello is this map taking in account all living males in that state? cause I know that for example among whites in some some states like Washington state it is a recnt phenomena not to cut.Most men in their 40s are cut.

      So is this map including babies being born today which I would be too old to have sex with by the time they grow up and men in geriatric care born prior to 1930 when circumciison was not the norm? cause I think most men born in the USA between 1940 and 1990 are circumcised? correct me if I am wrong.

      Jan 15, 2012 at 3:35 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Alex
      Alex [Different person #1 using similar name]

      Hello is this map taking in account all living males in that state? cause I know that for example among whites in some states like Washington state it is a recent phenomena not to cut.Most men in their 40s are cut.

      So is this map including babies being born today which I would be too old to have sex with by the time they grow up and men in geriatric care born prior to 1930 when circumciison was not the norm? cause I think most men born in the USA between 1940 and 1990 are circumcised? correct me if I am wrong.

      Jan 15, 2012 at 3:36 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Alex
      Alex [Different person #1 using similar name]

      You’re assuming a lot just from the statement I made, 7. It’s actually Protestant Hispanics that tend to be cut, and Roman Catholic ones that I think are less likely to be so.

      But yes, the more money your parents have, the more likely they are to aspire to some middle-class bourgeois ideal of what a boy should be – i.e. circumcised. There will be exceptions, as in your case, but these are broad tendencies that are very noticeable.

      First ,I do not think as far a Christianity religion has to do with it ,among white Americans I have met as many uncircumcised All-American Baptist/protestant hillbillies as I have Roman Catholics Irish American,Italian Americans in the Northeast who are circumcised.
      As far as social class,I think this would be more prevalent in Latin America itself and yes in Miami it would be the norm to be uncut cause there is an influx of newcomers everyday ,but Miami is not the American norm,even if its in the USA I consider its ties to Latin Ameircan.As far as second generations hispanics in Texas,the Southwest and California there are like 50/50 cut and uncut.Yes Hispanics in California coming today do not have the pressure to circumcise and in many of these staes Medicare coverage was dropped so it is not routinarly anymore and about New Mexico apart from the hispanics ,aren’there a lot of Indians/Native Americans there? Do they circumcise or not?

      Jan 15, 2012 at 3:58 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Alex
      Alex [Different person #1 using similar name]

      As far as men feeling uncomfortable being the minority in their state ,I would say Man,pack your bags and move to the Sunbelt! There are plenty of cuts and uncuts that will suck your uncut weiner there.Plus the warm climate is a bonus.

      and a question having New York state and Illinois in dark blue,would this only apply to New York City and Chicago.I doubt Upste New York has the same circumciison rates as New York City.New York City has many more uncut immigrants ans sons of immigrants than Upstae would?

      Jan 15, 2012 at 4:06 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Alex
      Alex [Different person #1 using similar name]

      As far as men feeling uncomfortable being the minority in their state ,I would say Man,pack your bags and move to the Sunbelt! There are plenty of cuts and uncuts that will suck your uncut weiner there.Plus the warm climate is a bonus.

      and a question having New York state and Illinois in dark blue,would this only apply to New York City and Chicago.I doubt Upste New York has the same circumciison rates as New York City.New York City has many more uncut immigrants ans sons of immigrants than Upstate would?

      Jan 15, 2012 at 4:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • FrankieJr
      FrankieJr

      Currently living in California from Michigan. I’m cut and a Filipino descent. Most in my family are on the medical field and yes I admit i feel not uncomfortable with uncut men. Philippines has very high percentage of circumcised men (very rare that you could find someone that’s uncut), some may interpret this as a religious thing but most treat this as a “Male Hygiene”. It is the presence of “SMEGMA” that attracts bacteria many times over as compared to circumcised guys, no matter how frequent you wash it. There was a even a history that the first recorded HIV+ people were uncircumcised, these statements came from a medical journal. Some women also complaints it, “the smell” after sex.

      Uncircumcised men can be a butt of joke in the Philippines. Its even worst than being gay…by the way Philippines is a gay friendly nation. Some may say “He is Wearing a Helmet”…meaning uncut. Because of a skin covering the penis head.

      Apr 11, 2012 at 12:05 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Rood
      Rood

      Thanks to more and more highly concerned, intelligent American mothers (and a few strong, forceful fathers), male genital mutilation is fast fading as a procedure for which anyone would forcibly subject innocent infants. Helpless infants never, ever give informed consent, supposedly a rule before beginning genital mutilation. Infants rather announce their feelings about being subjected to knives and cruel, crushing instruments by screaming in pain, by throwing up, by going into shock, and, in some cases, by bleeding to death. The whole business is a sign of how terribly depraved Americans have become during the past sixty years.

      Anyway … not wanting to be characterized in terms redolent of the violence of genital mutilation, whole, thinking men say they are INTACT.

      Apr 30, 2012 at 7:33 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Hmmm...
      Hmmm...

      I just encountered one for the first time, I found it very odd.

      May 12, 2012 at 2:17 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • MMDD
      MMDD

      @Hmmm…: You make it sound like you just met an alien from another planet.

      May 12, 2012 at 3:41 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Rood
      Rood

      @Hmmm…:

      You encountered what for the first time, Hmmm… a mutilated dick? One with an ugly scar?

      If so, yes, cut cocks are rather “odd”. Ugly too.

      Send him to http://www.norm.org/ There he’ll learn all about foreskin restoration.

      May 12, 2012 at 5:06 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Hugh7
      Hugh7 [Different person #1 using similar name]

      @ MMDD @Hmmm… instead of one of the 70+ percent of men in the world lucky enough to still have all they were born with. Without making any other comparison, I imagine African and Middle Eastern strayt men encountering their first intact woman – does anyone object to saying “intact” woman? – react the same way.

      Prejudice against normal, natural, whole genitals is just about the last prejudice still freely encouraged in US media.

      May 12, 2012 at 6:25 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • MMDD
      MMDD

      @Rood: Speak for yourself. My cut dick looks pretty damn good, and my husband’s uncut dick looks damn good too.

      May 14, 2012 at 10:29 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Dennis
      Dennis

      To all the americans that are uncut here, if someone has a problem with it, tell them to shut up and suck it already.

      Honestly, if someone doesnt want your dick because it’s uncut, then they’re not even worth your time. :)

      I know it’s a whole “Why do you care?” arguement, but my brain just goes “Why would you even do that to your penis?!”.
      But why are Americans so easy on letting a man with a scalpel cut off a piece of your childs penis?

      May 25, 2012 at 2:37 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • MMDD
      MMDD

      @Dennis: “Honestly, if someone doesnt want your dick because it’s uncut, then they’re not even worth your time. :)”

      Exactly.

      May 26, 2012 at 10:35 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • LittlRichard
      LittlRichard

      I’ll tell you this much, boy did it save straight folks here from the AIDS epidemic

      Umm…I do not see an AIDS epidemic going on in Europe,Latin America or non-Islamic Asia where most men are uncircumcised,so the answer to AIDS prevention is condoms not circumcision.

      Aug 11, 2012 at 3:52 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Serge
      Serge

      map makes sense .doen’t take a rocket scientist to figure this one out if you know where the immigrants and their first generation sons live:West and Urban centers.
      Speaking of,wonder if they did not count Miami in Florida,Chicago in Illinois and NYC in New York State what color those states would look? would go down to look more like there neighboring states in the light blue with less than 10 to 15% uncircumcised.

      Aug 11, 2012 at 4:00 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Hugh7
      Hugh7 [Different person #1 using similar name]

      Serge: the wild variations just underline the irrationality of the whole thing. Even within Chicago, there is huge variation depending on which hospital you have the good or bad luck to be born in. A guy demonstrates regularly outside the University of Chicago Hospital because of its abnormally high circumcision rate. He’s become a bit of a local identity as “Foreskin Guy”, but people who stop and talk to him find he talks a great deal of sense. He has a dramatic T-shirt: http://www.cafepress.com/intactivism.397734879

      Aug 11, 2012 at 6:42 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • abeaustin
      abeaustin

      Boy there are so many misconceptions here. Being uncut is hot. Honestly I also like both and I am uncut. Also hygiene has to do with individuals not about being cut or uncut. Also AIDS is more about practices, alot of people are circumcised in the US and it has a very high rate.

      Dec 11, 2013 at 6:20 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • QUEERTY DAILY

     




    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.