Republicans are quickly learning that same-sex marriage isn’t the wedge issue it once was … just a year ago. GOP chairman Michael Steele is equally hands-on as he is hands-off, while New York governor hopeful Rudy Giuliani, a staunch anti-gay marriage advocate, has learned to tone things down (sometimes). Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty is eying a presidential run in 2012; marriage equality might not even make his issues list. Then how ironic it must be, then, that letting gays get married could still be an election issue in a certain state — and one that candidates are actually touting their support?
(Pictured, L-R: Gavin Newsom, Jerry Brown, Meg Whitman, Tom Campbell)
That’s the dilemma faced by San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, who wants to take Arnold Schwarzenegger’s top California job. He’s pro-gay marriage, but he recognizes voters need to know him for more than just an equality advocate. So he’s actually working to distance himself from the issue, or at least broaden his repertoire. But he’s not avoiding the issue altogether, and in fact makes a talking point out of showing the difference between him and Democratic challenger Jerry Brown, the state attorney general who sued to invalidate Prop 8. (Brown says he’s more pro-gay than Newsom; Newsom says Brown just joined the fray to win votes.)
But in California — a state reeling from Prop 8 and rocked by an issue most observers expected to be, well, a non-issue there — the matter won’t die. Which means whoever faces off in November 2010 will be appealing to voters who are also hitting the polls to vote on a possible repeal of Prop 8. And that means all candidates will have to take up same-sex marriage this election cycle, making it an election issue once again. This is significant.
How about we take this to the next level?
Our newsletter is like a refreshing cocktail (or mocktail) of LGBTQ+ entertainment and pop culture, served up with a side of eye-candy.
Politically speaking, there’s no obvious choice where to place your support to attract voters. Los Angeles Times: “In California, where Newsom’s rebel edict in 2004 touched off the court battles that spawned some 18,000 marriages that were declared valid Tuesday, candidates for governor face multiple dangers on the issue. Although support for gay marriage has risen over the last decade — the 52% yes vote on Proposition 8 was down from 61% on a similar measure in 2000 — the issue still sharply divides Californians. ‘People care about this one — a lot — on both sides,’ said Steve Smith, a Democratic strategist who worked on the campaign to defeat Proposition 8. A Field Poll taken three months ago affirmed stark generational and ideological splits on same-sex marriage. Younger voters were far more likely to approve of it than older voters. And Democrats overwhelmingly favored it, while Republicans were strongly opposed. In that environment, candidates for governor are juggling wildly different needs for the primaries and the general election. To score points with partisan voters in the June 2010 primary — regardless of party — is to risk harm in the broader arena of the general election.”
Which means any primary race candidate, no matter how much he supports marriage equality, risks going overboard with support, which could divide voters in the general election. Or maybe not: Front-running Republican candidate Tom Campbell, a former congressman, supports same-sex marriage. (He also favors higher taxes, which begs the question: Republic-a-what?)
And then there’s Meg Whitman, the former eBay chief, whose stance on gay marriage just about mirrors what happened last week with the California Supreme Court: She wants the 18,000 marriages to remain valid, but doesn’t want any more same-sex unions from here on out.
We’re still more than a year away from November 2010’s election, but there’s little indication anyone on either side of the gay marriage debate plans on going quiet anytime soon. And if equality advocates do go forward with putting a Prop 8 repeal on next year’s ballot, you can be certain we’re going to find ourselves right back where we were in November 2008: Debating whether anyone should get to vote on your relationship.
dgz
well, one thing they all have in common is that they’d all be completely powerless to change the situation either way… govs can’t legislate, or veto constitutional provisions.
Jeff Chang
Your missing Dianne Feinstein a possible, but highly probable candidate.
According to current democratic poll numbers she is has the most support among likely voters.
paulied
@Jeff Chang: I may have dreamed this, but I believe Gavin Newsom said he wouldn’t run if Diane Feinstein planned to.
WeTheSheeple
While Govs can’t change the constitution, having gay marriage as a major topic in the election will help counter the lies & money the Mormons will probably put up this time too. The votes to defeat prop 8 were there (2 million people who voted didn’t bother to vote either way on prop 8), what was lacking was a coherant message. This time will be different.
Lee
Don’t recall reading a definitive “I won’t run if she plans to,” but Newsom knows, as does everyone else, that Feinstein would beat anyone with one hand tied behind her.
But given that he is now officially running, he either knows that she’s decided not to or just couldn’t wait any longer to start his campaign and is risking it.
I think ANYONE is INSANE to WANT to be CA’s governor which has the demands of a country more than a state. A dominant issue in how much harder it is to effect change than in tiny states like Maine and New Hampshire, it is not just our most populous state, but ONE-EIGHTH of the US population lives here. More people live in Los Angeles County alone than in each of 42 STATES.
My own hope was that Feinstein would retire and Newsom could take her US Senate seat where his youth, brains, charisma, and unimpeachable record on FULL LGBT equality would create shock waves.
Alas, it’s not to be yet, so send a few bucks his way http://www.gavinnewsom.com.
[img]http://www.tecumsehproject.com/gayNewsom_clo.jpg[/img]
tavdy79
There’s also the added advantage of all the grass-roots stuff that’s sprung up over the last 6 months. If people like Rob Tisinai, the Leffews and Keith Hartman keep producing the great stuff they have over the last few months then pretty soon there’ll be a huge online resource not just for CA or even other US states, but also for those EU/EFTA & UNASUL states that haven’t legalised yet as well.
One thing though: are there any Spanish speakers who’d be willing to do translated versions of these vids? One major source of opposition to gay rights is Hispanics, so it would make sense to target them specifically.
cymatic
@tavdy79: “One major source of opposition to gay rights is Hispanics, so it would make sense to target them specifically.”
Based on what evidence?
Captain Freedom
There you go again Queerty. Trying to start trouble when trouble doesn’t exist. Accusing our greatest ally, Gavin Newsom, of distancing himself from us. This is DESPITE the fact that he has been very public on national TV in the past week condemning the Supreme Court decision and calling for Prop 8’s repeal in 2010.
This website is PEREZ HILTON TO THE MAX! Every negative stereotype about gays being uppity, annoying, and gossipy is exhibited in this website. Indeed this website has the maturity of an adolescent’s GBFF (gay best friend forever!!).
Gavin Newsom put his entire reputation on the line for us when even the Democrats were stepping out of the way while the Christian Race Federation called for our extermination in concentration camps in 2004!
Phoenix (Foot Soldier in the Pink Platoon)
Question: Why California Can’t Decide Whether to Make Marriage a Big Gubernatorial Issue?
Answer: Politicians are chicken-shit bastards who only care about appealing to the largest mass of voters and getting re-elected.
daleandersen
Who was the dumb-as-dirt dude who advised the “No on Prop 8” people to take another stab at the ballot box? Must be the gay evil twin of the nerd who told Sarah Palin to “just be yourself.” HAAAAH!
http://tinyurl.com/cal-gay-flag
luvrly
If I was a voter and lived in Cali, I’d vote for Newsome. At least when we get the shaft it comes from someone pretty.
Mayena
The legislature can overturn a state constituional provision. Providing just two-thirds of the vote.
christophe
This is off topic, but Its odd that its after 2pm on 31st May and Queerty hasn’t posted a single new article today?????
dgz
@christophe: no new articles on sundays.
Katie
Tom Campbell actually endorsed NO on 8, which I thought was awesome. The problem is, your average voter never heard of him.
While I am a democrat, I think the road towards marriage equality needs to include Log Cabin Republicans and socially progressive Republicans. Joe central-valley voter does not give a darn what I have to say, and they are probably really suspicious of Gavin Newsom. A lot of the YES vote in the central valley was seen as an anti-San Fransisco vote.
So the more we can find advocates who are Republicans or from non-Bay Area places I think the more likely we’ll win on this issue.
Lee
@luvrly:
1. Only the willfully retarded call it “Cali.”
2. No “e” at the end of “Newsom.”
3. “shaft/pretty”…how cute. There is no straight politician in the country who has shown more courage on gay equality than Gavin Newsom. Dismissed by cretins as a “it was easy to do in San Francisco,” they overlook that he was pillored by his own party for his marriage equality courage, INCLUDING by gay Barney Frank and his mentor Feinstein. Obama wouldn’t even have his picture taken with him at the fundraiser NEWSOM was hosting FOR Obama’s US Senate race, and he was kept off the platform and off official camera at last summer’s Dem convention where any other young, charismatic, brilliant, HOT Dem would have been BEGGED to appear.
Then there’s that little thingy about the 1000 plus death threats he’s received and, the fact that he still hasn’t backed down from his support for marriage equality while Obama is still condemning it and hiding from his outdated and bigoted “separate but equal” promise to fight for federal benefits for “civil unions.”
Captain Freedom
Jerry Brown = Larry David
luvrly
@Lee:
Retarded, eh? Where I grew up, that’s what everyone called it.
And sorry about the spelling. My bad.
And I’m not so naive to believe that he will stay an out and out supporter of the LGBT community. He is a politician who will sacrifice ANY ONE and ANY GROUP on the alter of politics to further his own career. Politicians are only out to further their own careers. They will promise the Moon, everyone will believe them and vote for them and then when the delivery comes, we get Swiss cheese. I don’t trust ANY politician, even the out gay ones; farther than I can throw them. They are only out for themselves.
Robert, NYC
If Sotomayor is for marriage equality and it is amazing that we still don’t know her views, nobody has asked her, but if she is confirmed and probably will be, this has the potential to swing a lot of hispanic voters to support marriage equality when it comes up again in the primaries. I hope I’m right.
DaveO
@Jeff Chang: The odds of DiFi running are slim to none. She got what she wanted – chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee – so is likely to stay out of the gubernatorial race.
yeson8won
If Newsom wants to have a cat in hell’s chance of become CA Governor he will have to tone down his pro-homosexual rhetoric. It may fly in his home town and in west Hollywood but not with the majority of Californians.
He already regrets his famous taunt that same sex marriage is coming ‘whether you like it or not’.
‘”I’ll never say that again. I learned my lesson,” Newsom told the town hall crowd in Fresno. “I’ve got to be more humble.”
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090531/ap_on_re_us/us_gay_marriage_calif_governor;_ylt=Ah.k_Fuaol4XmFsI8T.q0iL9xg8F;_ylu=X3oDMTE3cmtiaDU1BHBvcwMxMQRzZWMDTXdfVml0YWxpdHkEc2xrA2dheW1hcnJpYWdlZA–
Catherine
@yeson8won:
First, I’m going to say right now that I don’t know much about California politics, or what went on during the campaign last year.
But, to me, it looks like he supports equal rights, he just regrets saying what he did because Prop 8 supporters used it against him, not because he was changing his views.
And by “majority of Californians” I assume you mean 52% of them, and I think that we can turn around those numbers. Here’s hoping.