Why Did GM Pull Those Hot Bumble Bee Boys Off YouTube?
 
 

gmbumble

You might've thought General Motors — just out of bankruptcy — was really trying to reach the gay audience when it debuted the "Bumble Bee Boys in Briefs" video this month. But all of a sudden, the clip showing two cuties washing the new 2010 Camaro (wearing only yellow underwear with the car's model spelled on the butts) disappeared from YouTube. What gives?

GM didn't fully "vet" the viral clip, and once upper levels of management caught wind, they ordered it pulled. Also gone? "Another [video that] shows the preparation of the briefs the "go go boys" are wearing as they wash a Camaro: C-A-M-A-R-O was stitched across the bottoms. A third is up-close-and-personal with the two models — one is a graduate college student in public policy."

gmbumble2

"Bumble Bee Boys" was promoting "Chevrolet Gay Day at the Movies," a sponsored event in Los Angeles tied to the premiere of Transformers 2; one of the characters in the film is named Bumble Bee.

Maybe the clip did a little too good a job promoting the event? Because clearly it was too racy for corporate. The folks responsible for spending billions in taxpayer dollars didn't want to send the impression the government bailout was being used to, like, show off go-go boys. "Our LGBT outreach group did just some grassroots, viral, simple videos to promote the event itself," says GM's LGBT media relations head Travis Parman. "Our LGBT group who normally handles this thing is the group who did it, so we didn’t want to shy away from that responsibility. But it had not been vetted through every single group." And had it been? "It probably never would have been posted."

And here we thought GM wanted us to think the Camaro was a dude magnet.

 
 
Fark Facebook Digg StumbleUpon Del.icio.us Reddit
Comments (29)

No. 1 · Bill

What Gay person would drive a friggin' CAMARO????????????????????

I thought those were specifically built for Homophobes.

Posted: Jul 10, 2009 at 3:27 pm
No. 2 · BrianZ

@Bill: I'd love to read the rationale behind your "thought" as posted above.

Posted: Jul 10, 2009 at 3:44 pm
No. 3 · ajax

I think the underwear crosses the line. I'd feel that way if it were two women, a man and a woman, or two men. I bet the reaction wouldn't have been the same if the men were in swimsuits.

Posted: Jul 10, 2009 at 3:52 pm
No. 4 · Cornerframe

one of the boys may be a grad student, but one of the boys is also a gayporn star working for ChiChi LaRue

Posted: Jul 10, 2009 at 4:07 pm
No. 5 · D-Sun

@ajax:

Because flesh is a terrible, evil thing that must be kept hidden from public eyes at all times.

Posted: Jul 10, 2009 at 4:15 pm
No. 6 · Dave

@Cornerframe: Who in LA isn't an aspiring "actor" LOL. Every cute guy you see in TV ads has shown his cock somewhere. LOL

Posted: Jul 10, 2009 at 4:17 pm
No. 7 · ajax

@D-Sun: D-Sun, a Speedo doesn't cover any more flesh than the underwear they're wearing. The issue is the implied intimacy of two people in their underwear and the fact that the outdoor location is inappropriate for that level of intimacy between any two people. It's bad taste.

The men look great in their underwear – it just doesn't belong in the street.

And, I trust you're speaking about your won flesh, because I'm fine with mine.

Posted: Jul 10, 2009 at 4:46 pm
No. 8 · ajax

@ajax: not "won" – "own".

Posted: Jul 10, 2009 at 4:47 pm
No. 9 · Ted B.

When I was in college in the late 70's, driving a Corvette meant 50/50-chance you were gay. One of my hottest memories from my HS days was watching this hot bare-chested stud in barely-there jeans-cutoffs get cruised behind the wheel of his early 60's 'Vette Stingray convertible by this cute skateboard twink at the local convenience store parking lot. Though he obviously didn't know the kid, who was barely (if) legal, he offered him a ride. "Hey kid, wanna ride?" Which was promptly accepted….

I still get hard reliving that, and hoping they had a nice "ride".

Posted: Jul 10, 2009 at 4:49 pm
No. 10 · Not So Fast Cowboy

The impportant thing here is that we get
to the part where you ask me how I'm gonna get down to the shore.
- Oh, how you gettin' down to the shore?
- Funny you should ask, I've got a car now..
- Ah wow, how'd ya get a car?
- Oh, my folks drove it up here from the Baahamas.
- You're kidding!
- I must be, the Bahamas are islands. Okay,, the important thing here is
that, uh, you ask me what kinda car it is.
- Uh uh, what kinda car do ya' got?
- I've got a bitchin' Camaro…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tIJA_zLeM3I

Posted: Jul 10, 2009 at 4:49 pm
No. 11 · TANK

@ajax:

This is crazy talk. Why doesn't it belong in the street? What kind of implied intimacy? That they're fucking? Oy. So what if they're selling product using sex appeal–not necessarily fucking. So you want people to burkha up, is that it? I don't see your argument.

Posted: Jul 10, 2009 at 4:51 pm
No. 12 · HayYall

@Not So Fast Cowboy: Wanna take some retards to the zoo later?

Posted: Jul 10, 2009 at 4:53 pm
No. 13 · D-Sun

@ajax:

They're lathering up a car. Not eachother's dicks.

And who cares how much skin they're showing? I don't. Hell, they could be washing that car in little more than a conveniently placed cardboard Chevy logo, and I'd be A-OK with that. I've got no problem at all with people showing off as much skin as they please. If you don't like it, just look in the other direction.

Posted: Jul 10, 2009 at 5:09 pm
No. 14 · drew brown

sad i missed the video before it was pulled from youtube, lol.

Posted: Jul 10, 2009 at 6:00 pm
No. 15 · marius

Ford tried the gay marketing thing and ended up with a big fat wingnut boycott.

Posted: Jul 10, 2009 at 7:39 pm
No. 16 · alan brickman

don't be fat and jealous…these guys are hawt!!..

Posted: Jul 10, 2009 at 8:05 pm
No. 17 · J

@Bill: i would drive a camaro, fo sho

why does every gay have to fit some stupid stereotype of what is "homosexually correct"? i deal with this all the freakin time

Posted: Jul 10, 2009 at 10:20 pm
No. 18 · marius

@J:

I've been reading car magazines since I was 12. I once had a red '64 Impala SS convertible and now have a cranky old Porsche 944. I wouldn't mind a new Camaro, even though they're a bit on the porky side. Can't be perfect.

I'm a closet car case, but I don't wash my car in my undies.

(No. 9 Ted B.'s story about the 'Vette driver and the skater boy could be a scene from vintage Wm. Higgins)

Posted: Jul 10, 2009 at 10:38 pm
No. 19 · alan brickman

tell the "BRUNOS" to stop being so jelaous…

Posted: Jul 10, 2009 at 11:48 pm
No. 20 · TikiHead

@ajax: "D-Sun, a Speedo doesn't cover any more flesh than the underwear they're wearing. The issue is the implied intimacy of two people in their underwear and the fact that the outdoor location is inappropriate for that level of intimacy between any two people. It's bad taste."

Of course. That's why Speedos are illegal outdoors, and those wearing them are automatically arrested for public lewdness!

Posted: Jul 11, 2009 at 12:57 am
No. 21 · hyhybt

There's a difference between Camaros and Corvettes.

Posted: Jul 11, 2009 at 12:59 am
No. 22 · KyleR

I actually like GM. I would buy a Camaro if it was a car I actually wanted. It's not. I actually want one of their little crossovers, the Equinox.

Posted: Jul 11, 2009 at 2:27 am
No. 23 · Topher

I was given a '70 Camaro for my HS graduation in 1977. I drove that thing into the ground!

Posted: Jul 11, 2009 at 7:22 am
No. 24 · DEEPTHROAT

@ajax: I LIKED YOUR SPELLING OF "WON"

Posted: Jul 12, 2009 at 3:47 am
No. 25 · trunksy

Anyone have copies of the three Bumble Bee Boys videos before GM pulled it? Hawt!!! Get in touch with me so you can send me them.

Posted: Jul 18, 2009 at 4:56 am
No. 26 · Flex

That was a sexist move against men dealt by GM.

The sexism occurs because GM doesn't want the Camero associated with guys in yellow bathing suits, but it would've been OK if it were females.

Posted: Nov 3, 2009 at 2:44 pm
No. 27 · Flex

Tikihead, what are you talking about?

It isn't illegal to wear a speedo in public. We would be restricted from entering a public building, but we can wear anything we want, where ever we want!

Posted: Nov 3, 2009 at 2:47 pm
No. 28 · Flex

No. 1 Bill, why do you associate the two guys with being gay?You've exercised homophobia by sexualizing the two of them. They're only washing a Camero in a bathing suit.

Posted: Nov 3, 2009 at 2:49 pm
No. 29 · Republican

Flex,

Agreed.

Posted: Nov 3, 2009 at 2:50 pm
Leave a Comment

It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account. It's quick.

Already have an account? Then log in!

By posting, you agree to our Comments Policy.

 
 
Scroll Posts
Queerty Home | Advertise | Copyright 2009 Jossip Initiatives