<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Is the DNC Actively Ignoring Maine&#8217;s Marriage Battle?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.queerty.com/why-is-the-dnc-actively-ignoring-maines-marriage-battle-20091103/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.queerty.com/why-is-the-dnc-actively-ignoring-maines-marriage-battle-20091103/</link>
	<description>Free of an agenda. Except that gay one.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:16:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: naghanenu</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/why-is-the-dnc-actively-ignoring-maines-marriage-battle-20091103/#comment-232440</link>
		<dc:creator>naghanenu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=73280#comment-232440</guid>
		<description>Hmm David,

No people will not in this day and age ban interracial marriage. Wanna know why cause love it or hate it..interracial still involves a man and a woman. Race might irk some peope but it will not be an issue such as a man and another man getting married.

My neighbours look about to hurl when i mention the idea of two men married with kids. It does not compute to them at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm David,</p>
<p>No people will not in this day and age ban interracial marriage. Wanna know why cause love it or hate it..interracial still involves a man and a woman. Race might irk some peope but it will not be an issue such as a man and another man getting married.</p>
<p>My neighbours look about to hurl when i mention the idea of two men married with kids. It does not compute to them at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ehrenstein</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/why-is-the-dnc-actively-ignoring-maines-marriage-battle-20091103/#comment-232439</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ehrenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=73280#comment-232439</guid>
		<description>Can you imagine what the results would be if interracial marriage were out to a vote?

TODAY?


I rest my case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you imagine what the results would be if interracial marriage were out to a vote?</p>
<p>TODAY?</p>
<p>I rest my case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/why-is-the-dnc-actively-ignoring-maines-marriage-battle-20091103/#comment-232334</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=73280#comment-232334</guid>
		<description>Yes, but Obama promised, PROMISED, to be a &#039;fierce advocate&#039;.  Never once mentioning the Maine ballot issue is hardly being a &#039;fierce advocate&#039;, rather it is an utter dereliction of advocacy.

No worries, he&#039;ll receive the same level of support in the next election from many GLBT people as he has given them in this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but Obama promised, PROMISED, to be a &#8216;fierce advocate&#8217;.  Never once mentioning the Maine ballot issue is hardly being a &#8216;fierce advocate&#8217;, rather it is an utter dereliction of advocacy.</p>
<p>No worries, he&#8217;ll receive the same level of support in the next election from many GLBT people as he has given them in this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/why-is-the-dnc-actively-ignoring-maines-marriage-battle-20091103/#comment-232320</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=73280#comment-232320</guid>
		<description>Blame religion.  We have NEVER beaten religion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blame religion.  We have NEVER beaten religion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/why-is-the-dnc-actively-ignoring-maines-marriage-battle-20091103/#comment-232258</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=73280#comment-232258</guid>
		<description>nExile  wrote, &quot;No3: Passive approval is just that, he could have taken a stand or at least spoke out pubically, but he did not. His passive approval enabled the bigots to use his voice in robo calls prior to Prop 8 voting. (&#039;marriage is one man and one woman&#039;) Remember? If these ballot measures pass, it&#039;s all on him.&quot;

The reality is that the &quot;Yes on Eight&quot; campaign, which lied about all sorts of things, lied about Obama - he in fact had publicly opposed Proposition Eight calling it divisive. the &quot;Yes on Eight&quot; side used an out-of-context and misleading clip at the very end of the campaign, when both McCain and Obama were trying to get as many votes as possible in &quot;swing&quot; states.  Would you rather have had Obama lose the election and get McCain, who actually was in favor of Proposition Eight, instead?

If you want to blame anyone, blame the &quot;No on Eight&quot; campaign - they could have used the clips of Obama saying that Proposition Eight is divisive to counter the other side&#039;s lies.  They didn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nExile  wrote, &#8220;No3: Passive approval is just that, he could have taken a stand or at least spoke out pubically, but he did not. His passive approval enabled the bigots to use his voice in robo calls prior to Prop 8 voting. (&#8216;marriage is one man and one woman&#8217;) Remember? If these ballot measures pass, it&#8217;s all on him.&#8221;</p>
<p>The reality is that the &#8220;Yes on Eight&#8221; campaign, which lied about all sorts of things, lied about Obama &#8211; he in fact had publicly opposed Proposition Eight calling it divisive. the &#8220;Yes on Eight&#8221; side used an out-of-context and misleading clip at the very end of the campaign, when both McCain and Obama were trying to get as many votes as possible in &#8220;swing&#8221; states.  Would you rather have had Obama lose the election and get McCain, who actually was in favor of Proposition Eight, instead?</p>
<p>If you want to blame anyone, blame the &#8220;No on Eight&#8221; campaign &#8211; they could have used the clips of Obama saying that Proposition Eight is divisive to counter the other side&#8217;s lies.  They didn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InExile</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/why-is-the-dnc-actively-ignoring-maines-marriage-battle-20091103/#comment-232152</link>
		<dc:creator>InExile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=73280#comment-232152</guid>
		<description>No3: Passive approval is just that, he could have taken a stand or at least spoke out pubically, but he did not. His passive approval enabled the bigots to use his voice in robo calls prior to Prop 8 voting. (&quot;marriage is one man and one woman&quot;)Remember? If these ballot measures pass, it&#039;s all on him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No3: Passive approval is just that, he could have taken a stand or at least spoke out pubically, but he did not. His passive approval enabled the bigots to use his voice in robo calls prior to Prop 8 voting. (&#8220;marriage is one man and one woman&#8221;)Remember? If these ballot measures pass, it&#8217;s all on him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wondermann</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/why-is-the-dnc-actively-ignoring-maines-marriage-battle-20091103/#comment-232091</link>
		<dc:creator>wondermann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=73280#comment-232091</guid>
		<description>Please folks, I got the email and I&#039;m in L.A. This was not a &quot;Maine&quot; flyer. this was sent to those who are on the email list.

InExile, please... How will this be Obama&#039;s fault?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please folks, I got the email and I&#8217;m in L.A. This was not a &#8220;Maine&#8221; flyer. this was sent to those who are on the email list.</p>
<p>InExile, please&#8230; How will this be Obama&#8217;s fault?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fitz</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/why-is-the-dnc-actively-ignoring-maines-marriage-battle-20091103/#comment-232012</link>
		<dc:creator>Fitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=73280#comment-232012</guid>
		<description>Though the Earth may stop rotating, I agree with InExile. What Obama does is make it ok to call yourself a progressive humanist while still hating the fags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though the Earth may stop rotating, I agree with InExile. What Obama does is make it ok to call yourself a progressive humanist while still hating the fags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InExile</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/why-is-the-dnc-actively-ignoring-maines-marriage-battle-20091103/#comment-232009</link>
		<dc:creator>InExile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=73280#comment-232009</guid>
		<description>If the bigot vote wins in Maine and in Washington today, it will be ALL President Obama&#039;s fault just like Prop 8 was! Obama&#039;s silence on gay&#039;s civil rights being voted away is nothing less than passive approval.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the bigot vote wins in Maine and in Washington today, it will be ALL President Obama&#8217;s fault just like Prop 8 was! Obama&#8217;s silence on gay&#8217;s civil rights being voted away is nothing less than passive approval.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

