Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
  OH SNAP

Yeah … Stare at Taylor Lautner’s, Uh, Vitamin Water

90602NN1

OH SNAP — You already saw Taylor Lautner’s hot new bod in the new Twilight trailer. But how does he get so fit? By hitting the gym, like he was yesterday wearing some loose sweats. (Click to enlarge) (Photos: Bauer Griffin)

By:           editor editor
On:           Jun 3, 2009
Tagged: , , ,

  • 125 Comments
    • Andrew
      Andrew

      Wow… nice Vitamin Water. I’m thirsty…..

      Jun 3, 2009 at 11:21 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • rigs
      rigs

      he’s 17 creeps

      Jun 3, 2009 at 11:35 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Fitz
      Fitz

      This just in: man has a penis. Stop the presses.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 11:46 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • naprem
      naprem

      @rigs: That is a valid point.

      @Fitz: That isn’t.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 11:59 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Adam
      Adam

      i would raise the point that he is 17 and so should not be put on display, but queerty’s editors don’t seem to care about the most basic standards of journalistic integrity anyways.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 12:01 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Jesse
      Jesse

      This borders on kiddie porn and is completely inappropriate.
      I really don’t need to see the crotches of teenagers. Please check yourself before you wreck yourself.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 12:03 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Louie
      Louie

      Big deal…my boyfriend has a 4-gallon bottle

      Jun 3, 2009 at 12:03 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • adamblast
      adamblast

      Sure he’s 17. A 17-year-old *movie star*, hired for his sex appeal and marketed for his sex appeal. The photos & the leering may be tacky, but they’re no more reprehensible than the 50 million Americans who obsessed over Britney Spear’s 16-year-old boobies.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 12:17 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • AlanInSLC
      AlanInSLC

      @adamblast:

      Thats a good point too!

      Jun 3, 2009 at 12:36 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • OH Charlie
      OH Charlie

      @adamblast: WELL SAID

      Jun 3, 2009 at 12:48 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Qjersey
      Qjersey

      don’t confuse “kiddie” porn with being a minor.

      Kiddie porn = pedophilia.

      A 17 year old actor walking around with his meat flapping around and getting snapped by the paps isn’t kiddie porn

      and btw he looks a bit plump in the pic, maybe the gym was arousing.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 12:49 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • schlukitz
      schlukitz

      @Qjersey:

      OMG! I can see the floodgates opening on this one already.

      Try to tell that to some of the other posters who regularly toss the word pedophile about on these threads with wild abandon.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 1:05 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Andrew
      Andrew

      Who cares if he’s 17? He’s in public, he’s a movie star and celebrity. And yes, 17 year-old men have penises. And no, snapping a photo of a clothed 17 year-old celeb does not amount to kiddie porn. Everybody airing their faux-moral-objections presumably never looks at marketing/advertising either, right? Because many of the models in those ads are 17 and 16 and 15… Oh wait… that’s ok? We are so fucked up by our Puritan roots — objectifying youth and young bodies and then feeling guilty for our “sins.” Get over it. Looking at this kid’s photo, and yes… at the outline of his cock, does not make one morally depraved.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 1:18 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • stevenelliot
      stevenelliot

      uh guyz? if you havent checked out a 17 yo dude sportin
      bulge-meat when walking down the street, then youre not a gay man. You dont think straight guyz check out underage girls?

      Wantin doesnt mean gettin and goin to jail…..

      Jun 3, 2009 at 1:26 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • schlukitz
      schlukitz

      @stevenelliot:

      Ain’t that the “gawd’s honest truth.”

      If lookin and wantin were a crime, 99 percent of the population, both male and female, would be behind bars! LOL

      Most are are just too hypocritical to admit it.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 1:36 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Lee
      Lee

      Class can you say, “Casting couch”?

      Jun 3, 2009 at 1:47 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • adamblast
      adamblast

      In fairness I’d point out that we all generally (and many of us specifically) have reasons to be touchy and eager to disassociate ourselves from the pedophilia that’s so often been tied to being gay by our enemies. But that doesn’t mean we should succumb to puritanical hypocrisy. Because if enjoying teenage hotness means pedophilia or kiddie porn, then the owners of MTV and the CW should probably be arrested immediately.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 1:47 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • OMG
      OMG

      People people people. Can’t we all just get a grip? Why do we even care this guy has – gasp – a penis? And it’s slightly visible. BIG DEAL! Mother of Christ, news must be slow today…

      Face it my fellow queers: men have penises. And, and and and…no, wait for it….women don’t. They DON’T! Really!

      Madness, I tell you…

      Jun 3, 2009 at 2:24 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Jackson
      Jackson

      This is incredibly inappropriate. If the editors at Queerty really wanted to be a positive voice in the fight to get our equal rights, they would avoid nonsense like this. Clearly, however, David Hauslaib is only interested in driving traffic to the site in order to make money on advertising.

      Think I’m over-reacting? Consider this scenario: In the unlikely event that Queerty ever became an original source for an important story, they might find themselves being interviewed by the mainstream media. All our opponents would have to do is to bring up the fact that Queerty is a site where they post suggestive pictures of a 17-year-old’s penis and the argument would be over. I pretty much agree with people above that state that a 17-year-old celebrity isn’t child porn. However, I think “middle America” might disagree. That possibility is reason enough not to post these pictures, especially considering that most of Queerty’s postings are political and/or civil rights in nature.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 2:48 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • eric
      eric

      jackson, who the effing eff gives an eff if “middle america” disagrees? they also disagree with my right to get married, adopt babies, blah blah blah. the “possibility” of them disagreeing with posting this is not only NOT “reason enough”, it is completely irrelevant to me, and hopefully queerty as well.

      to some other posters, why is it creepy and gross to ogle a 17-year old and his covered penis but perfectly acceptable when, in a few months, he turns 18? this guy is super hot and unless you had been told differently, you would not be able to tell if he was 17, 20 or even 23. yes, it’s illegal to touch him and i wouldn’t, but pretending it’s the equivalent of staring down an 11-year-old is just puritanical hysteria.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 3:11 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Andrew
      Andrew

      @Jackson: I can honestly say I don’t give a rat’s ass about what middle-America (or ministers, or James Dobson, or Log Cabin Republicans, etc.) think. If you want to be looking over your shoulder at every move to make sure you’re not upsetting someone or offending the sensibilities of the religious right, etc., good luck. In the media EVERY day we see photos and videos of various people in revealing clothing. Should Queerty avoid posting pics of women that show cleavage? He’s a celeb and was photographed in public. Who gives a shit if the outline of his cock makes middle-America uneasy.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 3:40 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • schlukitz
      schlukitz

      @Jackson:

      And of course, we all know that the straight men of “middle-America” never, ever, look at “inappropriate” pictures of young women. What would “middle-America” gay men think? LOL

      Jun 3, 2009 at 4:06 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • alex
      alex

      @Andrew:
      Should Queerty avoid posting women’s cleavage? Of course not. However, if they post a picture of a 17-year-old actress with a headline like the one on this post, that’s another story.

      The point made isn’t that we need to bow to the middle American. It’s that when a politically-minded website like this veers into a gray area involving child pornography, they are potentially undermining any legitimate authority that which they claim.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 4:23 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Adam
      Adam

      @alex: Precisely.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 5:04 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Rock
      Rock

      @Louie: LOL!

      Jun 3, 2009 at 5:08 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Brandon
      Brandon

      @ Alex

      U obviously have no idea what child pornography actually is. Heres a link:

      http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00002256—-000-.html

      Educate yourself.

      Child porn is sexually explicit images involving a minor. This is not a “gray area involving child pornography”. He could be walking down the street naked & it would still not be a “gray area involving child pornography”. Thats like saying Michelangelo’s David is child porn b/c the model used was prob under 18 @ the time.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 5:16 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jesse
      jesse

      I am far from prudish and love a good crotch shot. The problem for me is that I’ve always seen queerty as more of a news site with a mix of skin and gay culture to keep people from falling asleep. I would expect a posting like this from Perez Hilton, but to me it’s beneath queerty..or used to be. There are many people who see gay men as child molesters and pedophiles. When a posting like this focusing on a 17 year old’s crotch is on display, it only fuels that misconception. I’m all for focusing on a crotch. go for it, but can it at least be 18? please?

      also, regarding pornography and the suggestion (one that I made) that this borders on child porn is valid.
      There are many definitions for pornography.
      It can merely be an image meant to create sexual arousal
      or in another time a picture of a woman’s ankle. I love dictionary.com if you go to that site and look at the various definitions and its origin. There is a wide precedent for usage of this word which could be appropriate to this discussion.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 5:54 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Tom in COS
      Tom in COS

      1.)@adamblast EXACTLY!!

      2.)Believe it or not the average age of consent across America is 16, not 18. Making him perfectly legal in 38 of the 50 States.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 5:55 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jesse
      jesse

      Brandon: Your definition is for “sexual exploitation” of children not child pornography

      Jun 3, 2009 at 5:56 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jesse
      jesse

      Tom In Cos- You are right about that. the age of consent is not 18 in all states, however film a 17 year old for your porno movie three days before his 18th birthday and you’ve got yourself a kiddie porn.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 6:00 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • SoCalTeen
      SoCalTeen

      Wow..

      I went to elementary school with him. All I really remember was him being extremely flamboyantly gay; that was the rumor on the playground in 6th grade — that he liked boys, heehee.

      I can’t believe that the little kid who performed karate moves for the school talent show is now Jacob in New Moon LOL.

      I also remember when he was in some Frosted Flakes commercial and everyone was asking for his autograph. Good times, good times.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 6:24 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Brandon
      Brandon

      @Jesse

      Wow, I guess Cornell University is wrong u should be teaching there instead. Amazing.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 7:03 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • James P. P.
      James P. P.

      ok, i can’t look at him sexually because he’s freaking Sharkboy. and back then i thought “hey, what a cute kid. he’s gonna grow up to be a really hot guy i bet.”

      next thing you know here he is at 17 with his shirt off and now his dick floppin’ around. well, he’s 17… but he’s freakin’ hot.

      unfortunately for me, i still see Sharkboy… so that’s the end of that….

      Jun 3, 2009 at 7:09 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jesse
      jesse

      Brandon: I am merely stating that the link you referenced in order to tear someone down on their use of the phrase child pornography isn’t a link to a definition of pornography as implied by your posting. The chapter is titled as follows.

      CHAPTER 110—SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN

      You used this as your basis for telling someone that they don’t know what child pornography is. The definition for child pornography within the context of this page is for a case of sexual exploitation and other abuse of children, and not a general definition of the term.
      There is a difference between child exploitation and it’s legal definition and the general usage of the word pornography which has several meanings. No one is saying that Queerty’s use of this photo falls under the legal jurisdiction regarding child pornography as defined by that link, which has a very specific usage of the phrase.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 7:42 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • CHILD PORN STFU!
      CHILD PORN STFU!

      Really? A HUGE part of popular culture is devoted to giving straight men hard-ons from looking at pubescent girls. And 17 years old is hardly underage considering that 16 is the age on consent in a majority of states:

      http://www.4parents.gov/sexrisky/teen_sex/statelaws_chart/statelaws_chart.html

      So STFU you faux puritans who want us to believe you’re so above a crouch cruise. I’d sooner spend a weekend with Xtians than your sorry hypocritical asses.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 8:31 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Alec
      Alec

      @CHILD PORN STFU!: Technically, lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area can be pornography, and “child” or “minor,” for the purposes of federal and most state laws, is defined as under 18. The age of consent is irrelevant when it comes to producing child pornography or sexually abusive materials.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 8:50 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • sparkle obama
      sparkle obama

      @adamblast:
      >> The photos & the leering may be tacky, but they’re no more reprehensible than the 50 million Americans who obsessed over Britney Spear’s 16-year-old boobies.<<

      we-elll…
      “they are just as rotten as we” is a loser argument, ladies.
      can we retire that sick attitude along with b. spears’ misbegotten career?
      gays can do better!

      young gays (and old gays who should have known better) who embraced the new level of mediocrity and proud ignorance that britney spears represented throughout the bush years are part of the problem, not part of the solution.
      i’m not going to say don’t leer at 17 year olds because i do it too, but most of Us don’t photograph those kids & exploit them on the interwebs in the name of an increasingly creaky & outdated sweeping, self-important “queer”/”gay” agenda
      a post like this is no different/better than the blog
      “drunken stepfather”: allowable in a free society but “politically incorrect” in the extreme
      and perhaps ultimately incompatible with our current “gay people are decent” civil rights “struggle” and family-friendly focus (“gay marriage”, anyone?)
      do what you want, queerty – i’m only saying!

      Jun 3, 2009 at 9:01 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • sparkle obama
      sparkle obama

      @CHILD PORN STFU!:

      you are a mess.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 9:03 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Brandon
      Brandon

      @Jesse

      U can’t possibly be this dense, can u? Please tell me ur joking.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 9:30 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Addyboo
      Addyboo

      Didn’t the mayor of Portland get into trouble for perhaps not waiting until his lover’s 18th birthday to get it on?

      And am I the only one who thought Twilight was atrocious? As a fan of vampire shit, I was not impressed.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 9:54 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • TomTom
      TomTom

      It beats queenie-weenie or whatever his name is.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 10:27 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Alec
      Alec

      @Addyboo: The film or the book? I could at least get through the former; the lack of narration helped a great deal.

      Jun 3, 2009 at 10:49 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • TANK
      TANK

      This taylor kid did this on purpose to make you all feel bad about yourselves for perving out on his junk.

      Jun 4, 2009 at 12:02 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jesse
      jesse

      @Brandon-
      Your ability to type “legal definition of child pornography” into google and click on the first result does not make you more intelligent nor more capable to judge the intelligence of others. If you can make a constructive argument without insulting those you don’t agree with, then I’m open to that discussion. Otherwise, this “debate” is a rather futile matter of semantics.

      The whole child pornography discussion is perhaps a bit off topic anyway. The point is that this is an image of a minor, focusing on his genitals, which comes across as a bit pervy. We have fought as a community to not be viewed as child molesters, pedophiles, etc. When a site like Queerty who tried to come across as a semi respectable news source for our community posts something like this, it takes us down a notch, regardless of whether you want to call it bordering on child porn or just tacky.

      Jun 4, 2009 at 9:39 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • schlukitz
      schlukitz

      @jesse:

      “focusing on his genitals, which comes across as a bit pervy.”

      Spoken just like Joe Six-Pack. Morally righteous and uptight. Your fellow parishioners must be very proud of you.

      What would you have gay men looking at, by the way? Tits, ass and snatch?

      I’ll bet dollars to donuts that that you’re probably against queers getting married and making a spectacle of themselves by holding hands or kissing in public.

      What will “normal” people think?

      Jun 4, 2009 at 12:52 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jesse
      jesse

      @schlukitz- Haha. I am in a relationship with and actually engaged to another man. Read my previous posts on this topic and you’ll see that I’m all for a crotch shot, just not of a 17 year old. I even *gasp* own porn.

      I have repeatedly written my representatives, senators and the president asking for the repeal of DOMA and DADT. I have marched in multiple protests for marriage equality including the one from Sheridan to Union Square last week. I do not attend church nor do I believe in organized religion. You might just engage in an interesting conversation if you open your mind to accepting differing opinions without feeling the need to either sum up or attack others who are engaged in the discussion. There are many shades of gay.

      Jun 4, 2009 at 2:36 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Alec
      Alec

      @jesse: I think your posts are too thoughtful for this discussion.

      Jun 4, 2009 at 2:44 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Leila
      Leila

      I just followed a link, this is so immature the poor guy

      Sep 20, 2009 at 3:56 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • schlukitz
      schlukitz

      @Leila:

      One could say that of guys who like to look at the boobs of topless waitresses as well.

      “This is so immature. The poor girl.” ;>)

      Sep 20, 2009 at 10:36 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • doggy
      doggy

      wow wat small dick i am 14 and have a bigger cock then him

      Sep 20, 2009 at 4:42 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • dalis
      dalis

      umm, guys i don’t see his ding dong what are you talking about, he’s just a guy for petes sake. take a break and look at robert he’s been working out as well.

      Sep 27, 2009 at 12:01 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Tapper
      Tapper

      Omfg. Taylor, you look hott, and iloveyou <3
      But to all these adults on here, you upset me
      Im fourteen, It’s OKAY for me to say he’s hawt, and that
      this picture is sexy.
      But how old are most of you? Over eighteen right?
      I’m gay, and i know people think we’re pervs, and we KNOW we arent. But saying the things some of you are saying isn’t making any rumors better.
      I actually have a REALLY big crush on him, and to the guy who said he still thinks of tay as sharkboy, SO DO I! I don’t know why everyone else thinks he’s a big sex symbol. But, if you didn’t think he was a hott sharkboy, you shouldn’t think he’s hott now. Because if he was too young then, he’s still too young now…just more grown up. Am i making any sence here? ANYHOW, point is just because someone is legally an adult, doesnt mean they’re old enough for you to date. It’s like some people i know, Straight guys who like younger girls. It’s a little growse, so is this. But pleeeeease listen to what I’m trying to say.
      Thanks Guys (:
      -Tapper ;)

      Sep 29, 2009 at 7:39 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Tessie Tura
      Tessie Tura

      When the object of desire is 17, that would not make you a pedophile. It would make you a pederast.

      If these pictures are “pornography”, he would be guilty of indecent exposure.

      Sep 30, 2009 at 8:55 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Jason
      Jason

      Sep 30, 2009 at 9:44 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • shana
      shana

      what a small cock unless that shit is folded or because its to the side

      Oct 26, 2009 at 7:55 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • wgf
      wgf

      ok first of all he is 18. secondly he is almost flawlessly beautiful. show as many buldge shots as you want. he is f*cking HOT

      Nov 6, 2009 at 1:46 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • shana
      shana [Different person #1 using similar name]

      listen wgf you little fucker i can say what i want about who i want so go suck a cock and i don’t mean taylor’s

      Nov 15, 2009 at 6:34 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Justin Cowan
      Justin Cowan

      Just an FYI to those freaking out about him being 17… that is the legal age of consent in most states, and in some states it’s 16

      Nov 22, 2009 at 9:20 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • schlukitz
      schlukitz

      @ No. 58 – Justin:

      Like the Catholic priests and other members of the clergy who sexually molest little children, the ones doing it are the ones who cry the loudest against pedophilia.

      Nov 22, 2009 at 11:50 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Dave
      Dave

      i cant tell if he is hard or not i think he is

      Nov 23, 2009 at 2:38 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Josh
      Josh

      if he is hard then he has a tiny cock.I am 13 and mine is bigger than his. way bigger…

      Nov 23, 2009 at 8:19 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jason
      jason

      i am 15 and honestly…its better to be looking at a 17 year old crotch then a 25 year old.
      you guys also have to take your age into consideration. i find this picture more appropriate for my personal taste compared to other pictures because of my age difference

      Nov 24, 2009 at 10:42 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Chris
      Chris

      he gives me a BONER!!!!!!!

      Nov 25, 2009 at 12:08 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Lance
      Lance

      looks like he’s uncut… nice

      Nov 25, 2009 at 12:38 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • katie
      katie

      Ok first of all, if I were Taylor Lautner, and I saw this with all you guys obsessing over whether it’s child porn or not, I would be seriously embarrassed. I mean, come on, it doesn’t even look like it’s his you-know-what! It could just be from the way he walks! You know how when girls sit in jeans, it looks like we have dicks? It could be sort of like that for Taylor! So quit obsessing over a 17 year olds probably not real dick

      Nov 25, 2009 at 10:39 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jason
      jason

      @KATIE

      dont think a crease would look like that

      Nov 25, 2009 at 10:57 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • monica
      monica

      Hey Katie… you are probably looking at pic number 2. LOOK AT NUMBER 2!!!!

      Nov 26, 2009 at 12:38 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • monica
      monica

      I am sorry number 1..
      not number 2

      Nov 26, 2009 at 12:38 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Veronica
      Veronica

      to the person who went to school with taylor…

      if you really did go to school with taylor i think he is gay…(THANK GOD IF HE IS) he is on a blog under… Tay Lay. like you said extremely flamboyantly gay…

      Nov 26, 2009 at 12:47 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Veronica
      Veronica

      i am sorry but he is NOT hot at all

      Nov 26, 2009 at 12:48 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Veronica
      Veronica

      oh and he is 18 now sooooooo this is legal…

      Nov 26, 2009 at 12:50 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Sophie Lautner
      Sophie Lautner

      Hi guys,
      Personally I love Taylor because he seems like someone who could be a good friend. And that he is totally and utterly devoted to what he does. If he wasn’t that devoted he wouldn’t be going to the gym. It’s not like he’s purposely flashing his crotch. Yes he is hot and fit, buy seriously no need.

      What flavour is his vitamin water? I wan’t to try it. Is it power c or defense?

      Nov 28, 2009 at 5:19 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • team jacob#1
      team jacob#1

      oh yeah ppls……your eyes aren’t deceiving you it’s big all right …yeah he has a big dick and he’s only 17!!! am i’m dreaming!!!!

      Nov 28, 2009 at 7:16 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • joshua
      joshua

      it is not big… it has to only be 3 or 4 inches maybe less…

      Nov 29, 2009 at 12:32 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • New Moon F4n
      New Moon F4n

      Heyy :). I just wanted to drop in and say that I think Taylor is is drop-dead gorgeous <3. I am a sixteen year old bisexual, and I hope he is gay!

      For all of you saying that his dick is small, maybe you should take a look at your flaccid dick… His flaccid is bigger than my flaccid… And its probably bigger than yours…

      Btw. I love his foreskin too <3

      Dec 3, 2009 at 9:19 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • guest
      guest

      im really thirsty for vitamin water now!!!…………drule………

      Dec 23, 2009 at 2:42 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • joshua
      joshua

      i cant stop drooling

      Dec 28, 2009 at 12:08 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • porngirl
      porngirl

      heey i got a nude porn foto off taylor on my computer you wanna have him just add me bad-ass-18@live.be i’m not kidding it’s real i got his nude pic

      Dec 31, 2009 at 1:08 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • john
      john

      i dont think he is flaccid… but still he is hot

      Jan 1, 2010 at 2:06 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • doood
      doood

      my vagina’s starting a rally.

      Jan 2, 2010 at 12:19 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • schlukitz
      schlukitz

      No. 80 · doood

      my vagina’s starting a rally.

      I love it.

      They say it pays to advertise. So, if boys can show their er, ah…schmeckies off in tight pants, what’s wrong with girls wearing pants that are tight enough to er, ah…read their lips? lol

      Jan 2, 2010 at 12:26 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Yvonne
      Yvonne

      it looks small :(

      Jan 11, 2010 at 7:18 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fbhunegijerhgh
      fbhunegijerhgh

      @Adam: that is not his real dick he wouldnt be able to fit behind the weel wit that thing!!!!!!!!!!! LOL jk but i likey alottt!!!

      Feb 15, 2010 at 10:55 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fbhunegijerhgh
      fbhunegijerhgh

      @schlukitz: ur an ass!

      Feb 15, 2010 at 10:56 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fbhunegijerhgh
      fbhunegijerhgh

      @Jesse: catchy

      Feb 15, 2010 at 11:04 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • schlukitz
      schlukitz

      No. 84 · fbhunegijerhgh

      @schlukitz: ur an ass!

      Um..what’s the old expression again?

      Ah, yes. It takes one to know one

      Oh…and thank you for sharing. ;P

      Feb 16, 2010 at 3:07 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Marc
      Marc

      the sexuality of teenage girls is always being marketed to heterosexual men of all ages. what is wrong is to pursue someone underage when you are an adult. but to notice for a moment the male form beginning the peak of male physical maturation is only a natural reflex.

      keep starring to the point that underage guys are your focus and you cannot form a healthy attraction psychologically and physically with a peer, then you are a pervert.

      Feb 17, 2010 at 5:49 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Meowzer
      Meowzer

      is it only me, or does that like just a wrinkle in the sweatpants. The first one I could see, possibly, maybe, a bulge. Second pic, now way, just a fold in the sweats.

      Plus, personally, any 17 year old that makes his living showing his abs and appearing shirtless constantly in movies, is fair game. He’s not a child, he’s an adult. The 17 or legal is only a number. A number that would get you jailed it your touched it. But to look, just a number.

      Feb 19, 2010 at 1:01 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Taylor Lautner fan
      Taylor Lautner fan

      omg, he is so hot!

      Feb 23, 2010 at 6:04 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • EWE
      EWE

      Thats a helluva lot cuter than his face. I do not think this guy is very good looking at all.

      Mar 13, 2010 at 10:24 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Devon
      Devon

      I for one think his weird little pig nose is adorable.

      And he’s legal now, score.

      Mar 13, 2010 at 10:57 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Alexa
      Alexa

      who really cares if he is 17 he should be named sexiest man on earth!!!!!!!! he is soooooooo sexy and yummy, the paparazzi did a pretty good job i think!! hahah :D delicious!!!!!!!

      Mar 25, 2010 at 5:12 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Josh
      Josh [Different person #1 using similar name]

      Just an update, Taylor Lautner is an adult, so look as much as you want lol!!! xD
      Oh, and if this pic is genuine (which I personally think it’s been Photoshopped)… then boy or boy does that sexy boy have a nice cut dick…. :D
      Watch out Taylor Swift, you’re bf’s got beef !!

      Apr 1, 2010 at 9:06 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • J lautner
      J lautner

      I for one am obsessed with him and still think this is immature, both he picture And the heavy debating. Give it a rest, give that sexy guy a break!

      Apr 6, 2010 at 11:34 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • khris
      khris

      wow he’s 17!I might just try to scoop him up now I thought he was25

      Apr 10, 2010 at 3:46 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • ossurworld
      ossurworld

      An actor being an exhibitionist? unheard of….

      Apr 10, 2010 at 5:17 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • TrickyPuck
      TrickyPuck

      Uhm, to quell the argument as of February 11, 2010, Taylor Lautner officially turned 18. All you people feeling skeevy can stop, and anyone not feeling skeevy, well whatever. Just updating the facts, he’s not 17 any longer.

      Apr 13, 2010 at 1:32 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Jazzy
      Jazzy

      Taylor you have gay fanboys!

      And your B-Day is one after mine W00T!@#$!

      Also lol at all you nerds talking about this pic.

      Apr 28, 2010 at 2:13 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • will
      will

      @Jackson: without realising it yourself, you are descriminating against gay people, you are objectifying us over our attraction to a 17 year old (btw at that age he’s completely sexually mature and its only natural for people of all ages and genders to be attracted to him), if “middle america” wish the think that its more wrong for a gay man to be attracted a 17 year old guy it is for a straight man to be attracted to a 17 year old girl (do i need to remind everyone of when Britney first burst onto the scene?) then let them. i’m sick of the taboo around gay men and younger guys and im sick of having to change or pretend different about myself because of the straight/ gay double standard.

      anyone who says that people who are attracted to this, must therefore be saying that its wrong to be attracted to big muscles, big dicks and a gorgeous face. and i’d say that every gay/ bi man and straight women in the world would have to disagree.

      May 16, 2010 at 9:44 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • will
      will

      anyone who says that people who are attracted to this are wrong or pedophiles*

      missed a word sorry.

      Read more: http://www.queerty.com/yeah-stare-at-taylor-lautners-uh-vitamin-water-20090603/comment-page-2/#comment-303117#ixzz0o6GEsgCA

      May 16, 2010 at 9:47 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Amy R.
      Amy R.

      I’m a lawyer. To those who say this is pornograpphy, its not. Nudity is not pornography. Nudity is not sexual. Pornography under definitions of law is the depiction of persons in a sexual act. It certain;y does not include simply a picture of a person nude. There are those out there who do not understand the legal definitions and basically dont know what they are talking about, are hysterical, do not understand legal philosophy or the law, and this even includes incompetants in the legal profession. Laws on child pornography prohibit depiction of children in sex, not nudity. This is a well established legal precedent and it something today many lawyers dont even understand. Consider the number of National Geographic magazines which have contained pictures of children without clothin g on. Laws are created to protect people from injury, no one is injured by this. The hysteria about nudity is religiously inspired crap that has nothing to do with individual rights.

      Jun 4, 2010 at 9:50 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • trawnaPride
      trawnaPride

      @Adam: Taylor was born on Feb. 11, 1992. Unless he is caught in some strange time warp, that means he is 18.

      Jul 4, 2010 at 6:33 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Rob Moore
      Rob Moore

      @Amy R.: At least someone who read this wasn’t having a religious spasm of the knee. Thanks for a rational comment. As TrawnaPride points out, Taylor Lautner is 18 and will be 19 in February.

      I also believe that even at 17, he is past the age of consent for California. If he is a virgin whether straight or gay, then so am I.

      I just hope he never does a sequel to The Adventures of Shark Boy and Lava Girl. My five year-old niece dragged me to that bit of dreck. Even 3-D glasses didn’t make it watchable.

      Jul 8, 2010 at 11:50 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • QT
      QT

      His rod does look kinda small, but that wouldn’t stop me from pouncing on it.

      Jul 13, 2010 at 11:40 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Will
      Will

      @Amy R.: your actually wrong in your own definition of the law in this case, while you are right that this woukd not be porn, your not correct in your definition of pornography, one does not have to be having sex or even partaking in any form of sexual act for it too be porn, it could simply be a picture of someone naked, therefore a picture of a naked child is legally considered child pornography if the picture is is of a sexual nature and is intended for a sexual purpose. Therefore if Taylor Lautner were 17 and completely naked in a picture that someone took of him and was posted on the internet so that people could peve on his naked body, then it would be considered child pornography, as its intention is that of a sexual nature.

      Jul 27, 2010 at 10:07 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Will
      Will

      @Amy R.: your actually wrong in your own definition of the law in this case, while you are right that this would not be porn, your not correct in your definition of pornography, one does not have to be having sex or even partaking in any form of sexual act for it too be porn, it could simply be a picture of someone naked, therefore a picture of a naked child is legally considered child pornography if the picture is is of a sexual nature and is intended for a sexual purpose. Therefore if Taylor Lautner were 17 and completely naked in a picture that someone took of him and was posted on the internet so that people could peve on his naked body, then it would be considered child pornography, as its intention is that of a sexual nature.

      Jul 27, 2010 at 10:07 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Will
      Will

      sorry for double post

      Perve* instead of peve

      Jul 27, 2010 at 10:09 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • JonathanHasHadIt
      JonathanHasHadIt

      I just saw that movie “Twilight: New Moon.” AWFUL.

      Aug 4, 2010 at 6:17 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • donald joseph
      donald joseph

      who’s the kid in the picture, except what he’s got between his legs. Look at the size of that flaccid thang! work it boy!

      Aug 7, 2010 at 12:45 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Give Him A Break!
      Give Him A Break!

      I’m Pretty Sure Taylor Did This He Knew It Was Showing How Could He Not..! But He Knew It All Along, Right? I Mean Look At The Naked Pics OF Miley Cyrus Around Here. I Saw One That She Was Like All The Was nude In A HotTub.. SO Whats Sooo WRONG! With This? I Mean Nothens Wrong with this.. But Still Freaks He’s 17.

      Aug 11, 2010 at 7:37 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Dusty
      Dusty

      @Tom in COS:
      I’m pretty sure the male/male age of consent is 18 in most parts of the country. It’s male/female that’s around 16 or even 14 in places.

      Sep 16, 2010 at 4:46 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Ryan
      Ryan

      I’m sorry but I myself am a 17 year old. Get over it he is sold on his sex appeal, and its not like he has someone bouncing on his penis in a video so its hardly kiddie porn.

      Oct 12, 2010 at 6:45 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Modelchick
      Modelchick

      He’s actually 18 and will be 19 February 11th. So that makes him a legal man and no longer a 17 year old kid.

      Oct 29, 2010 at 10:23 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • bob
      bob

      THESE TWILIGHT MOVIES ARE SOOOOOOOOOO HORRENDOUS!!!!!

      WHY ARE THEY MAKING MORE?????

      Feb 15, 2011 at 6:58 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • hello
      hello

      OMG!! his penis iss sooo tiny

      Mar 2, 2011 at 12:47 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • wangyfd
      wangyfd

      IS he really gay???

      there are tons of rumors that he is

      May 30, 2011 at 1:00 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Tú Madre
      Tú Madre

      I want to walk up and snatch his pants down, get on my knees, stand that thing up and suck lick and rub it till its hard, then bend over and plunge it in to my tight little ass hole and ride it till he cums in side of me, and last I would suck AND SWALLOW the leftover cum on his cock.! Js.

      Jun 3, 2011 at 12:45 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • wow=mom
      wow=mom

      he has a big one big deal!!! you people are mad cuz you dont get it at all!! c========3 :-] <3

      Jul 8, 2011 at 6:04 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • wow=mom
      wow=mom

      you hatein

      Jul 8, 2011 at 6:07 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • drew
      drew

      disapointed…thought it wud b bigger :(

      Jul 24, 2011 at 12:33 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • drew
      drew

      lol that makes 2 of us…even though its small

      Jul 24, 2011 at 12:35 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • LJ
      LJ

      Ignorant people! I’m Dutch and have 9″+ but you would never know it by looking. It’s “a grower not a shower.”
      Ignorant remarks people make.

      Jan 18, 2012 at 4:32 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Chaos
      Chaos

      u guys complain so much….. do you think he cares about that little photo…. look he enjoys it

      check this site and see for urself

      http://www.taylorlautnernude.net/

      ain’t he hot?

      Mar 27, 2012 at 10:58 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Gemukokoro7
      Gemukokoro7

      jokes on all of you because hes an adult now ^.^

      May 2, 2012 at 5:11 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Moonie
      Moonie

      http://mobile.blboystube.com/videos/showing-off-naked-amazing-hunks.html . the guy in there look like taylor lautner :D

      Aug 10, 2012 at 12:59 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    FOLLOW US
     



    GET QUEERTY'S DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.