Photos

Zac Efron Just Keeps Feeding Gay Fantasies

1 2 3 4Next »

gqefron4

Yes, this is the Zac Efron photo from GQ that’s going to keep you warm at night. But don’t you know the 17 Again star is also a wannabe style icon? HE IS NOT YOUR SEX MONKEY. But feel free to keep treating him like one.

1 2 3 4Next »

Jump to 27 Comments

By: editor editor
On: Apr 14, 2009
Tagged: Celebs, Photos, Zac Efron

Email This

27 Comments

No. 1 · rogue dandelion
that picture evokes so many questions- who is that person sitting on the car watching him? Is mr. efron holding a pose or in the middle of a maneuver? Why isn’t sans shirt more often?

Apr 14, 2009 at 12:34 pm · @Reply ·
No. 2 · afrolito
Soooo beautiful…swoons..

Apr 14, 2009 at 1:08 pm · @Reply ·
No. 3 · Shaniqua Ubangi
he does absolutely nothing for me

Apr 14, 2009 at 1:44 pm · @Reply ·
No. 4 · Chitown Kev
I have no use for Zac Efron if he’s not wearing flip flops, though he is cute.

Apr 14, 2009 at 1:56 pm · @Reply ·
No. 5 · OMG
Cute, in an “aaaahhhh…that’s sorta cute” way. Hot? Hell no… Boy’s way to pretty (and aware of it) to be hot to me.

Apr 14, 2009 at 2:25 pm · @Reply ·
No. 6 · Michael W.
@OMG: He’s not too pretty. He’s just enough pretty. Enough to want to show him off as your main squeeze and make other guys jealous (at least I would).

Apr 14, 2009 at 2:33 pm · @Reply ·
No. 7 · Tony
i don’t find him attractive at all.

Apr 14, 2009 at 3:44 pm · @Reply ·
No. 8 · Attmay
Ugh. I like men, not boys. I haven’t liked boys since I was one myself.

Apr 14, 2009 at 4:45 pm · @Reply ·
No. 9 · 33mhz
So, how long before Queerty reports on the death of seminal queer theorist Eve Sedgwick? Lightweight feminist gawker blog Jezebel has already scooped a site that’s in theory about gay issues.

Apr 14, 2009 at 4:49 pm · @Reply ·
No. 10 · Chitown Kev
@33mhz:

ah, “the epistemology of the closet”…

Apr 14, 2009 at 4:55 pm · @Reply ·
No. 11 · Winter
That cover photo is hideous.

Apr 14, 2009 at 6:00 pm · @Reply ·
No. 12 · DJ
@Tony: So, what’s it like being a eunuch?

Apr 14, 2009 at 6:20 pm · @Reply ·
No. 13 · Hannah
The style they put him in in these pictures make him look like he’s in a Hairspray sequel.

Apr 14, 2009 at 7:48 pm · @Reply ·
No. 14 · BrianZ
@Shaniqua Ubangi: Ditto. I sort of cock my head to side, in that confused canine sort of fashion, every time I see him. Seems a decent enough guy, though.

Apr 14, 2009 at 8:00 pm · @Reply ·
No. 15 · Karloff
Enough about Zac already! More news, less teen idols.

Apr 14, 2009 at 8:07 pm · @Reply ·
No. 16 · Michael W.
You poor blind souls. Granted these may not be Mr. Efron’s most flattering pictures, but a failure to recognize the scrumptiousness of this handsome boy god is a tragedy.

Apr 14, 2009 at 11:53 pm · @Reply ·
No. 17 · hardmannyc
@33mhz: Edie Sedgewick died a long time ago. Didn’t you see that documentary about her?

Apr 15, 2009 at 10:43 am · @Reply ·
No. 18 · hardmannyc
He’s not bad looking, but whoever did his hair should be burned at the stake.

Apr 15, 2009 at 10:44 am · @Reply ·
No. 19 · Chitown Kev
@hardmannyc:
different person, this sedgwick is a queer literary theorist. The book of hers that I cited above is a standard text in queer theory courses.

Apr 15, 2009 at 10:57 am · @Reply ·
No. 20 · Phil
@hardmannyc Maybe you should brush up on queer humor.

Apr 15, 2009 at 11:09 am · @Reply ·
No. 21 · Phil
@harmannyc, sorry directed at @Chitown Kev… Your queer humor is fine.

Apr 15, 2009 at 11:10 am · @Reply ·
No. 22 · Chitown Kev
@Phil:
you never know, nowadays…

Apr 15, 2009 at 11:43 am · @Reply ·
No. 23 · myrios123
I would be okay with a daily Zac Efron update… he’s my kind of eye candy.

Apr 15, 2009 at 1:49 pm · @Reply ·
No. 24 · Michael W. [Different person #1 using similar name]
@myrios123: We could only be so lucky.

Apr 15, 2009 at 7:53 pm · @Reply ·
No. 25 · Le Michael Porreca
Honestly, he isn’t that attractive.

Apr 16, 2009 at 12:20 am · @Reply ·
No. 26 · alan brickman
Edie’s prettier than Eve for sure….

Apr 16, 2009 at 12:35 am · @Reply ·
No. 27 · michael
Bores me to fucking tears.

Apr 16, 2009 at 2:04 am · @Reply ·