A lesbian British solder says she was unfairly kicked off active duty in Afghanistan in December 2009 for, well, being a lesbian person who has romantic interests. Okay, it’s a little more complicated than that: she’s accused of “social misconduct” for having a relationship with another enlisted woman, whose hands she was spotted “rubbing sun cream” into. According to one staff sergeant, It was “wholly inappropriate for a mature woman and a commissioned officer to behave like a love struck teenager.” The Daily Mail relays:
Karen Tait, 29, who is claiming sexual discrimination against the Ministry of Defence and her commanding officer Lieutenant Colonel Deborah Poneskis, upset the chain of command with her ‘sly and underhand’ behaviour, the employment tribunal in central London heard. Cpt Tait, an operations officer with the Royal Military Police, was sent home from Afghanistan in December 2009 after Lt Col Poneskis decided to cut short her tour because of alleged ‘social misconduct’. The openly gay soldier, who started a sexual relationship with Sgt Caroline Graham before deployment with 4 Royal Military Police’s 160 Provost Company, denies having any intimacy with her while on tour or allowing their relationship to affect her professional judgment. But she was accused of arranging to move Sgt Graham from Kandahar to Camp Bastion so they could spend more time together and adjusting their leave rotas to coincide.
She said her warrant card was removed, and on her return to the UK she was forced to take leave while an investigation was made into her misconduct. David Mitchell, representing the MoD, read from several statements from her colleagues. He quoted Staff Sergeant Lee Truman, a senior non commissioned officer, as saying: ‘I cannot emphasise enough how sly and underhand Cpt Tait has been in her decision making. She has attempted to get her friends around her and stopped at nothing to achieve this.’
So just what sort of offensive infractions did Tait allegedly commit?
Another staff sergeant described an incident in which Cpt Tait was allegedly seen rubbing sun cream into Sgt Graham’s hands. Mr Mitchell said: ‘He thinks it wholly inappropriate for a mature woman and a commissioned officer to behave like a love struck teenager.’ The staff sergeant said the two ‘selfish individuals were out for themselves’ and Cpt Tait was a ‘disgrace’. Another experienced officer said they were ‘so wrapped up in themselves it’s nothing short of criminal’. Cpt Tait, who graduated from Sandhurst, said Lt Col Poneskis demonstrated on a number of occasions that she was prejudiced against her. But Mr Mitchell said she only brought the complaint against her superior after accusations of prejudice against more junior officers came to nothing.
Sharing some SPF? To protect themselves against the sun! My god, did Tait then offer to rub said sun scream on her disgusting lesbian lover’s back and shoulders? This sort of behavior has no place in the armed forces. OFF WITH THEIR HEADS.
Daine
29 is akin to being mature? Are you kidding me? So I guess 40 is the new 60. When will people learn age is only a number.
Greg
@Daine: When we stop dying.
Steve
She was in a relationship with a sergeant. Don’t the Brits have rules against fraternization too?
Nik
Sorry, but Captain Tait is well out of order and your comment is ignorant. Gay, Lesbian or straight, you do not have a relationship with someone in the same unit, especially on active service. You do not surround yourself with Dorothy’s friends. Rubbing in hand cream? Sounds a bit like ‘look at us we’re s-o-o-o in love’. I can’t see two gay soldiers behaving like that – and let’s not forget that one was recently on the front cover of the Army’s Soldier Magazine. Captain Tait would have known the guidelines governing sexual relations between soldiers (the same for straight, Lesbian and Gay) and chose to break them. To scream discrimination is hypocritical and dishonourable.
US MP, Ret.
The US forces do not have any policy against serving with a significant other. My unit had several husband/wife, sister/brothers in it.
The point here is if she were not a lesbian and simply applying lotion on a fellow solider’s hand for whatever reason, it would be a non-issue.
The problem would be if she were using her position to play favorites with people for assignments. That is a leadership problem and one the US deals with under no fraternization polices.