Bad Student Filmmaker Is Also Liar

Brokeback High

Seems like everyone is trying to swindle us these days. First we had the James Frey controversy followed by the J.T. Leroy hoax. Now we’re having high school kids lie to us. And here we thought teenagers were perfectly behaved angels.

Straight boy Brandon Flyte claimed that his school expelled him for showing his high school class Brokeback Mountain short film called Brokeback High that featured a scene with male teens shirtless in bed. While the film was indeed shown in class, he wasn’t expelled. He perpetuated the lie on his own web site, where the story spread all over the world, pissing off queens everywhere. And now he has to deal with pissed of queens who have been lied to. Looks like Flyte’s in trouble for real this time.

These Brokeback parodies were starting to get so tired that someone was bound to be punished for them.

UPDATE: Straight boy Flyte claims the piece in The Oregonian is inaccurate. His own updated comments are after the jump.

High schooler in trouble for lie on Web site
[The Oregonian]

Brandon Flyte [Official Site]

By now many if not all of you have seen the story in the Oregonian, a story I awoke to with no little amount of surprise. It’s expected with a story that gets this kind of momentum and is over such a controversial issue to receive a negative response, and considering the overwhelmingly positive response it’s expected that the negative response should be overwhelming.

It’s also unsurprising that after such a strong response, the school should try to use every tactic they have to eliminate that support, and the disruption it’s caused their school. While I can appreciate their stance in trying to get the school back to normal — and I do NOT agree with or condone the apparent threats of arson and violence that the school board says they received — I also do not appreciate their attempt to discredit me. An attempt which has clearly begun to work.

Let me be clear on something. I never expected this level of publicity. I posted this in a few places I thought it might be of interest, but, maybe foolishly, never expected more than a few dozen people to notice or care. The attempts of my opponents to paint me as an attention-monger are lies of their own. I never contacted most of these media outlets. The Oregonian, CNN, MSNBC, the Advocate, and others, all contacted me. My website initially started as a place to inform my friends at school and elsewhere what was happening with my situation. I never sought this out. I linked to them as a point of interest in how far the story was spreading, for those who were reading my site, nothing more.

If I only wanted publicity for my film, I would have posted the film in its entirety immediately. But I did not expect this kind of attention — in fact, I expected that those who viewed my site would already have seen the film. And I certainly would not have linked to the Oregonian if I had been aware of the underhanded tactics the administration planned to use against me.

To address Superintendent Woehl’s claims, why did he refuse to elaborate on my “series of misbehaviors”? Aside from my sketchy attendance — to which even the Oregonian recognizes I have already admitted — I have had no prior disciplinary actions taken on me. What misbehaviors is he talking about?

In addition, the superintendent claims that the class assignment forbade sex, nudity, or violence. Yet two boys in each other’s arms is not sex, bare chests are not nudity (or else the entire swim team should be suspended for indecent exposure), and my film did have some violence which I was not asked to remove. Likewise, several of the other films had violence in them that was allowed to stand.

If as Woehl claims I was landed in trouble for not following the guidelines of the assignment, and was not a blanket ban on the content of my film, why were the guidelines of the CLASS assignment upheld in a DIFFERENT class?

I have seen PG-13 movies shown at my school, during classes with nothing else going on, that had more explicit sex scenes than what I showed. I saw a film made for the assignment with explicit drug use that was not asked to be removed. Why should I be disciplined for showing a film that violated no rule in the class I showed it?

Additionally, he claims that the transfer was not mandatory. Whether the rest is a misunderstanding or not, this is an absolute lie. I asked specifically when I was called into the office and informed of the transfer if I had a choice in the matter, and I was told that I did not. If I had, I would not have chosen to attend the Community College, as I wanted to spend the remainder of my senior year with my friends.

I have not been a model student throughout high school, but in the past year I’ve been trying to turn it around, and to have everything thrown away in the home stretch is disheartening and insulting.

As I said, I can understand Woehl’s desire to stem the disruption caused by the apparently thousands of unpleasant e-mails he’s received. And, now that he’s tried to brand me a liar, I know can’t convince anyone of my side if they want to believe him. I’m a kid with bad attendance and he’s an adult who runs a school district. People will believe him. The Oregonian clearly did, and many of the blogs that have been watching this story have started spreading that version of the story. But I hope that some people out there know a smear campaign when they see one.

I’m just a kid fighting a bunch of adults who are protecting their names by now trying to destroy mine. I plan to hold my head high and continue fighting for the truth. It