DIVA DECISIONS

Diana Ross & The Supreme Court: 8 Landmark Cases In The Diva’s Own Words

diana-ross-supreme-court

Silence! Court is in session. The Honorable Miss Diana Ross presiding. Miss Ross landed her copter in front of the Supreme Court, ran out in a sequined catsuit, kicked out most of the Justices and is doling out verdicts on some of the most important cases the Court has ever heard — including today’s historic rulings on Prop 8 and DOMA. Not really one to share the spotlight, let alone the bench, Miss Ross cleared out everyone except Sotomayor and Ginsburg — only to later replace Ginsberg with Kagan when she started mouthing off about not singing backup.

Without further ado, let’s take a listen to Diana Ross and the Supreme Court’s greatest hits!

 

Lawrence v. Texas – “Ain’t nobody’s business if I do

diana-v-texas

Ruling: A Texas law classifying consensual, adult homosexual intercourse as illegal sodomy violated the privacy and liberty of adults to engage in private intimate conduct under the 14th Amendment. Texas state courts reversed and charges dismissed.

 

Roe v. Wade – “Love child, never meant to be

roe-ross

Ruling: Texas law making it a crime to assist a woman to get an abortion violated her due process rights.

 

Dred Scott v. SanfordSet me free why don’t cha babe

diana-in-field

Ruling: Persons of African descent cannot be, nor were ever intended to be, citizens under the U.S. Const. Plaintiff is without standing to file a suit.

 

Plessy v. Ferguson – “Someday we’ll be together

blues-white

Ruling: The “separate but equal” provision of private services mandated by state government is constitutional under the Equal Protection Clause.

 

US v. Nixon – “Respectfully I see to thee / I’m aware that you’re cheating

nixon_2

Ruling: The Supreme Court does have the final voice in determining constitutional questions; no person, not even the president of the United States, is completely above the law; and the president cannot use executive privilege as an excuse to withhold evidence that is “demonstrably relevant in a criminal trial.”

 

Brown v. Board of Education – “Reach out and touch/ Somebody’s hand/ Make this world a better place/ If you can

somebodys-hand

Ruling: Segregation of students in public schools violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, because separate facilities are inherently unequal.

 

Hollingsworth v. Perry and Windsor v. U.S. – “Sadie, Sadie married lady/ See what’s on my hand/ There’s nothing quite as touching/ As a simple wedding band

diana-michael

Ruling: Petitioners did not have standing to appeal the district court’s ruling. The 9th Circuit Court’s ruling is vacated and remanded under instruction that the appeal be dismissed.

Ruling: Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional.

And as always, Diana’s law is the law of the land. Why?

im-a-winner

Don't forget to share:

Help make sure LGBTQ+ stories are being told...

We can't rely on mainstream media to tell our stories. That's why we don't lock Queerty articles behind a paywall. Will you support our mission with a contribution today?

Cancel anytime · Proudly LGBTQ+ owned and operated