Does Hillary Prefer “Cream Puffs”?

hillaryclose.jpg
Sheesh. First we have debate over whether or not Hillary Clinton‘s too masculine, now there’s chatter about whether her male supporters are too girly…

A Salon reader recently asked columnist Camille Paglia what she thinks of Senator Clinton’s “passive-aggressive, sadistic, mean, little, petty beta-male pieces of work who would not naturally succeed in a common male-type hierarchy.”

Paglia’s certainly got loads to say on the subject:

I agree that the male staff who Hillary attracts are slick, geeky weasels or rancid, asexual cream puffs.

If I were to hazard a guess, I’d say Hillary is reconstituting the toxic hierarchy of her childhood household, with her on top instead of her drill-sergeant father. All those seething beta males (as you so aptly describe them) are versions of her sad-sack brothers, who got the short end of the Rodham DNA stick.

With her outlandish fibbing and naive self-puffery, her erratic day-to-day changes of tone and message, her glassy, fixed smiles, and her leaden and embarrassingly unpresidential jokes about pop culture, she has started to seem like one of those manic, seductively vampiric patients in trashy old Hollywood hospital flicks like “The Snake Pit.” How anyone could confuse Hillary’s sourly cynical, male-bashing megalomania with authentic feminism is beyond me.

And that’s coming from a Democrat!

Don't forget to share:

Help make sure LGBTQ+ stories are being told...

We can't rely on mainstream media to tell our stories. That's why we don't lock Queerty articles behind a paywall. Will you support our mission with a contribution today?

Cancel anytime · Proudly LGBTQ+ owned and operated