Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
Morning Goods

Drunk With Pleasure

On:           May 5, 2009
Tagged: , , ,
    • Zakakaka

      Sooooooooooo gay!

      May 5, 2009 at 7:31 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • james p. p.

      LOVE the eyeglass antlers – mainly because they are the most ironic accessory by being both eye protection and an eye hazard.

      May 5, 2009 at 8:21 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • timncguy

      finally a man with a perfect amount of body hair and a body that isn’t “overly” muscular. But, the pics don’t let us really enjoy it. Too many accessories.

      May 5, 2009 at 8:31 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • shelby84

      I love his hair… and I love that he’s “sooooooo gay!” Put him on plate please.

      May 5, 2009 at 8:34 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Raven

      I’ll chalk this one up to Art with a capital A because most of those outfits are ridiculous.

      May 5, 2009 at 8:47 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Sug Night

      Proof that clothes do NOT make the man…

      May 5, 2009 at 9:11 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Brad

      Exquisite beauty.

      May 5, 2009 at 9:25 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • DCastledc

      a little odd, but he’s still hot. Love #2!

      May 5, 2009 at 9:45 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Giovanni

      “Sooooooooooo gay!”

      Well then it’s a good thing this is a site for gay men!

      May 5, 2009 at 10:01 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • AJ

      Well, I love gay men so…

      May 5, 2009 at 10:25 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • ML

      It’s MUCH easier to view the photos here:

      May 5, 2009 at 10:26 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • RichardR

      @ML: Thanks, ML, maybe if we keep sabotageing these tedious page clicks the new QT team will get it.

      May 5, 2009 at 11:51 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • atdleft

      Why do the editors love to mess with our heads? Yesterday, we had an MG consisting of a cute guy with dull pics. And today? Antlers and silver pants and wild jewelry, oh my! Now if only we had today’s photographer doing yesterday’s MG model… ;-)

      May 5, 2009 at 12:04 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • joel

      French bottom

      May 5, 2009 at 12:14 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Maverick69

      All I keep thinking is O-N-J’s video for Physical if it were made today.

      May 5, 2009 at 2:55 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • gray hunt

      what were you thinking? Get back to super buff, hairless, handsome men.

      May 5, 2009 at 3:51 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Suburban

      I agree…these pics aren’t that good. My problem isn’t really with the model. Wait…are these supposed to be silly. Maverick69, that comment made me laugh.

      May 5, 2009 at 5:11 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Sam

      he’s a male version of “Mademoiselle GaGa”

      May 5, 2009 at 10:34 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Suburban

      If there was a stylist on this photo shoot then it’s his or her fault. I actually like the last pic just get rid of that stupid shit and show the model. @ Sam…I’ve seen Lady GaGa on LOGO and am surprised that mainstream radio has played her.

      May 5, 2009 at 10:44 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • alejandro

      thanks ML!

      May 5, 2009 at 10:57 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • hardmannyc

      someone please shoot his stylist and put us out of misery.

      May 5, 2009 at 11:54 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • mb00

      @Zakakaka: Shut. The. Fuck. Up.
      Why “ssssooooo Gay”? Why not “sssoooo hedious”, “sssooo ugly”, ssssooo many other things than “GAY”. Idiot.

      May 5, 2009 at 11:54 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Rikard

      Obviously styled for the jewelry and accessories which are, um not realistic for most of us. The model is lovely and the photography and processing are really good. I like the control of a muted color palette. The softness, or smoothing that would make a waxed model look plastic really works with a hairy man. An overly sharp pic of a hairy model can cause a visual crispiness that isn’t appealing.

      May 6, 2009 at 6:10 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Thumbnailboy


      May 7, 2009 at 8:21 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.

  • Copyright 2016 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.