profiling bans

Ft. Worth Cops Will No Longer Do Their Policing Based On You Looking Faggy


The only newsworthy aspect to this story about the Fort Worth Police Department implementing a new ban on “bias-based policing” is that, previously, bias-based policing was apparently a reasonable way for officers to conduct themselves. Racial profiling? Gender stereotyping? Completely fine! But in a new special order Fort Worth Police Chief Jeff “Take A Deep Breath” Halstead (pictured) signed on Friday, no longer can cops consider the “race, color, gender, age, national origin, religion, disability, economic status, sexual orientation, gender expression, gender identity, transgender status, membership in a cultural group or other individual characteristics or distinctions” while on the job. And if a cop is found to violate this order? He will face “termination in most cases,” says department spokesman Lt. Paul Henderson.

So how is this different from “racial profiling”? Because it bans any profiling. “The bias-based policing policy prohibits any prejudice from entering into the decision-making process,” says Henderson. “We may not be able to change a person’s behavior at work completely, but we sure can change their employment status if they bring their prejudices to the workplace.”

Don’t get me wrong: I think this is wonderful. A written policy expressly forbidding police officers from going after anyone based on immutable characteristics, as well as faith and socio-economic status is exactly the sort of thing every government agency across the land should have. But enacting a policy like this one just reminds us the Ft. Worth Police Department didn’t previously outright ban this behavior. Like back in July 2009, when the cops targeted the gay bar Rainbow Lounge, sent Chad Gibson to the hospital with a brain injury, and then refused to take responsibility for it.

Back then, it was considered perfectly good police work.

Get Queerty Daily

Subscribe to Queerty for a daily dose of #chadgibson #crime #ft.worth stories and more


  • dellisonly

    This could have been a positive post. You know the way the city of Fort Worth intended this to be. Making a public statement that profiling for any reason would not be tolerated for any reason. Queerty turned a good deed in a a weary world into something dirty. Grow up an just report. Leave your opinions a foot from the keyboard.

  • hephaestion

    Bravo to Fort Worth. This is good news.

    So why does Queerty give it a headline that leads us to believe Fort Worth did something wrong in its new policy?

  • Jake the libertarian

    Well I am certainly against “bias based” policing, but just out of curiosity, if this is taken to its logical conclusion, how in the hell if a police officer supposed to do his job identifying criminals? I mean, it seems to me that a lot of preventing crime and keeping people safe is based on responsible policemen stopping people who look or act like criminals and questioning them. Maybe it would just be better to come out and say what they really mean… “we are sorry we were targeting gays because they were gay. we wont do that anymore…”

  • Steve

    @Jake the libertarian asked: “how in the hell if a police officer supposed to do his job identifying criminals?”

    In many jurisdictions, they start by looking at “behavior”. People who avoid contact with officers are, often, doing so for a reason. Some officers also look for “evidence”.

    You identify drunk drivers by looking for cars that are weaving, not by stopping only black drivers for breathalyzer tests.

Comments are closed.