“I wish I had some Dolce & Gabbana crap so I could burn it.” – Reads a note posted by one of my witty on Facebook this week.
I usually don’t get worked up by stupidity. Luckily, there are enough hotheads in the news and social media that I can sit back and enjoy the public stoning of broadcast faux pas. Instead, I get worked up about nerdier stuff, such as campaign finance reform. However, many people have asked me what I think of the recent comments by fashion moguls Domenico Dolce and Stefano Gabbana, who were a couple for 23 years.
First, I roll my eyes at their “bling” with gold logos splashed all over tacky glasses, bags and clothes.
But then I really rolled my eyes when I read their statement that children of IVF are “children of chemistry, synthetic children. Uteruses for rent, semen chosen from a catalog.”
D&G later stated, “Our views are traditional, not judgmental.”
I give them credit for sticking their ground and not making public apologies to rectify the vicious backlash against their brand.
And semantically speaking, were they wrong? My children (produced via IVF and artificial insemination) could be considered “children of chemistry”. But taking that argument to a logical conclusion, aren’t all children “of chemistry”? Egg and sperm meeting creates a chemical reaction, right?
So D&G define traditionalism by their conservative Italian Catholic upbringing, a community whose edicts were constructed by a bunch of white men with zero experience in child rearing or long-term partnership (at least in the open).
Looking past archaic conservative Catholicism, what can the rest of us reasonably define as what is provided by a “traditional” family? Can we all agree on love and nurturing?
Does that require a mother and a father? Well, sometimes kids have to make do with their single mothers, single fathers, commune parents or older siblings. It’s not ideal, but they make do. And they’ve been making do ever since sickness and war began stealing parents away since…well, the same time period that women have had sisterly love and men have made brotherly love.
But gay parenting is not accidental chance like a suddenly single mother.
So is my child missing something by not having a mother? I ask myself that a lot. It was a major consideration before my partner and I started down the surrogacy path.
My French “mother” (long story) drilled me for years (and continues to do so) asking, “Don’t you think your son might be missing something, not having the nurturing bond with a mother? Or that the surrogate incubated your child, but didn’t foment love in the womb?”
Maybe.
But…my children eat their vegetables, don’t throw temper tantrums when I leave them with babysitters, snuggle with me on the couch, fall asleep in my arms, have twinkles in their eyes when they laugh with me, seek my approval, show off their “tricks” to me, run to me for comfort, stop crying when I hold them, laugh easily when I play “peek-a-boo,” nap wonderfully, charm strangers, easily stop fighting when I intervene, obey me, identify themselves as the children of two fathers, readily hug their friends and teachers, sing, dance, play, adore each other, would prefer to be with me than doing anything alone (but play by themselves, too), and run to embrace my partner and me every single time we walk in the door.
My kids love and love. And they are well-adjusted. They aren’t brats. They aren’t hyper-active, they aren’t obnoxious (despite my over-dramatic blog rants.)
So maybe they’re missing a cosmic, ethereal, uteran bond that other kids have?
I know my partner and I more than make up for that.
As for you, Messieurs Dolce & Gabbana, your “family values” juxtapose your professional aesthetic; one that fosters superficiality and actually undermines the traditional family.
Your ad campaigns trumpeting “traditional” Italian families, insult your Italian/Catholic roots. Endless macho men and air-brushed woman posing as “happily married” do not promote family values. They promote insecurity, superficiality and your own bank accounts.
Further, your ads prep children for disappointment. “Why doesn’t my traditional family look like that? Why can’t I be that beautiful/skinny/rich?”
Instead of helping make the world a better place (through, for example, compassionate parenting) you cultivate greed, lust and envy with your tacky materialism.
What quicker way to dismantle families?
Get it together, D&G: stop trumpeting antiquated ideas of what a traditional family should be, and help the rest of us celebrate the dysfunctional, devoted, beautiful families that the rest of us really are.
Gavin Lodge is a Broadway performer, father and blogger. This essay was first published on Daddy Coping In Style.
maxdadmark
Well said. However, it’s “make due”.
Jeremy Kinser
“Make do” vs. “make due” is sometimes debated, but Mirriam-Webster supports “make do” and so does Queerty.
dannyboi2
D&G made the mistake to not listen and think before they spoke. I suppose they might want future interviews to go through a PR rep, first.
dustashed
His children seem perfect… Perhaps a little too perfect. Just saying.
I do agree with most of the things he said. There is just something eerily perfect with the way he described his children that set off my spider senses, or maybe I’m just too jaded that i see something wrong where there is none.
DCFarmboi
The authors are right that surrogacy can create loving, well adjusted children. It just seems like a lot of trouble when there are children already created who need a loving home with parents who will care for them (be they gay or straight). I simply don’t understand the need for IVF and similar means.
Xzamilio
Meanwhile, Queerty, nutjobs like this exist and are still at it, spreading their messages of filth about the gay community:
http://shallowvoices.blogspot.com/2015/03/watch-vile-homophobe-in-action.html
Tell me if something didn’t “resonate” with you.
polarisfashion
@DCFarmboi: If I was partnered with someone who wanted to start a family, I would definitely consider adoption. I would even consider an older child or young teen because they need loving homes too. My great grandfather grew up in an orphanage and he was never adopted. That experience probably made him an even more loving dad to his seven kids. I feel blessed to have known him in my youth. He lived to be 93 years young!
DarkZephyr
@dustashed: I think he is just a proud Dad. 🙂
DarkZephyr
@Xzamilio: Holy Crap this guy takes awhile to make a point, doesn’t he? I don’t know if I even have the patience required to watch the whole thing because of all the self righteous name calling he does, calling people stupid or deviant homosexual sodomites, etc while annoyingly flailing his hands around as if to visually punctuate every other word. If I can stomach it I will try however because I am interested in seeing how good the two rebuttals someone made are:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sLOA41jeMc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kd0pWnClvgU
aliengod
Maybe if their argument was that we should stop creating these synthetic babies in favor of adoption, the response would be in their favor. There are so many children that need adopted. I wish more people would consider this option.
Giancarlo85
@Xzamilio: I was trying to watch that idiot and I would say to him: If you’re going to spew bullshit, do it quickly. Foaming at the mouth fool. He is all over the place. All I hear is “blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah deviant… blah blah blah blah blah homosexual… blah blah blah… *cough* blah blah blah blah homosexual… *cough* blah blah blah”. Seriously make a fucking point!
And he is trying to sound intelligent by lengthening his non-points, when in reality he’s nothing more than a pseudo-intellectual psychopath.
jwtraveler
@DCFarmboi: Agreed.@polarisfashion: Agreed.@aliengod: Agreed.
The really stupid part of their statement was the notion that gay people can’t be good, loving, caring parents regardless of how the children come into their lives.
ScottOnEarth
For Christ sake, just let it go already. ONE person (Dolce) expressed his opinion and every gay parent had his/her ego assaulted and threatened. Are people really that sensitive? Guess what – no one will agree with you all the time. That’s called life. Just live your life the way you see for and let others have their opinions, just as you have your opinions and the right to them. It’s called being a grown-up and having confidence. As if gay people aren’t constantly making bitchy, catty and judgmental comments all the time?!
Xzamilio
@ScottOnEarth: What you’re seeing is the free market and free speech at work here. Not only do I not have to like their opinion, I don’t have to patronize them with business, and neither does anyone else who doesn’t agree with THEIR –both of them share the same sentiment — opinions. Opinions, Opinions, blah, blah, blah. We’re all entitled to them and have a right to them, but we’re not entitled to having opinions go unchallenged or not be scrutinized if egregious.
Besides, these go beyond denigrating gay parents and denigrates the children that are the product of IVF. Although when if I wanted kids, I would go the route of @aliengod and adopt a child.
jantheman4903
what i object to are parents like elton (and straight also)who wait till their fifties or sixties to create a child ie when they are done having fun as i view it. i was an accidental child/mother fifty,dad 60. i never really knew my older siblings. am in late 30s and both parents are deceased. now people are doing this on purpose. I believe it is selfish. sorry if it is a bit off topic but it is so prevalent now.
Giancarlo85
@ScottOnEarth: Here we go again. People have a freedom to criticize all they want. When they see some outdated idiots like Douchebag&Garbage making stupid points I have a right to criticize. You need to learn even many straight people have criticized them. Hey when your family is being attacked see how you feel… Instead of making farcical comments about other gay people. You have a lot of growing up to do yourself.
jwtraveler
@ScottOnEarth: @jantheman4903: Both good points.
Tony Lopez
omg people are extra soft these days
mountainrover
I wrote a piece on HuffPost that demolishes every single bigoted argument against gay parenting and assisted reproduction:
“Surrogacy, Same Sex Parenting and What Sex Is For (and it’s not for making babies”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/trevor-martin/surrogacy-same-sex-parent_b_6898480.html?
Realitycheck
I would think Social interaction has evolved, not the notion of sex, from procreation
to pleasure.
Humans have engaged in orgies, gay sex and all the rest from the beginning of
history, it is only the influence of judaism first and its spin off: Christianity and Muslimanity.
That have imposed a strict sexual moral code and any gay sentiment.
That said, it is amazing how your article has immediately attracted the attention of a
pro life zealot, comparing artificial insemination to rape.