George Alan Rekers’ favorite service from escort Jo-vanni Roman? Something called the “long stroke,” which involved a “complicated caress” that Roman says went “across his penis, thigh… and his anus over the butt cheeks.” Ooh!
No longer hiding from reporters’ questions, the 20-year-old rentboy of the Focus on the Family founder tells the Miami News Times those rub downs took place at least once a day. Surely that can’t be all the “luggage” Roman was carrying for Rekers? And it certainly does fly in the face of Rekers’ claims that he didn’t engage in any sexual activity with the rentboy formerly known as Lucien.
“It’s a situation where he’s going against homosexuality when he is a homosexual,” says Roman. Whatever happened to the good old days of client discretion?
Jack E. Jett
This sex worker deserved every penny he made. The work is long and hard.
Cam
If you read the origional article in the Miami New Times, the Escort felt he should come forward because of the anti-gay activity this guy was involved in. It says a lot about the FAmily REsearch Council that their judgemental founder was looked down upon by a prostitute for having a low moral standard. I think that says it all. Good for this prostitute, I hope he gets a book deal out of it, or booked on a strip club tour, whatever, I just appriciate his willingness to put himself in danger of arrest to publicise this hypocrit even more.
Nick
Cases like this just add weight to the gay rights movement.
Well done rent boy!
PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS
I gotta take back what I said ’bout him in previous posts. He seems to be doing the right thing and not letting Reeks outrageous lies gain any credibility. I still believe that he had knowledge about Reeks prior. He seems intelligent and doubt he would have gone on a ten day international gig without doing little research into just who he was going with. I gots no problem if thats how he earns his living, and when the heat was turned on he did the right thing………….
DEREK WASHINGTON
I’m down with Team Jo-vanni!
scott ny'er
@PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS: i disagree. I’ve hooked up a dude and didn’t wasn’t able to get his real name and thus didn’t know who he was. Of course it wasn’t for 10 days. BUT, if you’re desperate for cash and it’s good money coming in, what do you care about a name.
Either way, Lucien is awesome to me. This story gets better and better. And it shows what a hypocrite Rekers is. Loves it.
Mike L.
UM Why is most of the stuff in the link for the Miami News Times crossed off (but still legible) including all comments?? WHat’s going on?
Some sort of Xtian-cyberattack(lol) on the site or something?
Just checked again and it’s no longer like that but what the heck was going on, seriously have the article was crossed with a line including the comments page.
PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS
@scott ny’er: I have hooked also and not had the full 411 on the dude also. However they had an email exchange prior to the international hook, and it seemed like they had had a “business relationship” prior, because Reeks was totally excited about the “fun beginning”. I did some hating on Jo-vanni because it seemed like he was covering for Reeks and not admitting to anything sexual. He now has come out (again I guess :-p) and fessed up about the sexual antics and bitchslapped Reeks for his being basicaly a vile, descipable self hating fag.
Anyone who can bring down a notable scumbag like this pathetic old fool who has caused decades of grief for the Gays, is aces in my book…………
Sam
That’s it? A daily rub-down? I was expecting something more kinky. Who the hell brings a prostitute to Europe for one sensual massage a day? I mean, seriously, get your money’s worth.
B
With respect to QUEERTY’s statement, “And it certainly does fly in the face of Rekers’ claims that he didn’t engage in any sexual activity with the rentboy formerly known as Lucien,” Rekers can claim a lack of sexual activity with “Lucien” if he uses the same definition the lawyers settled on when Bill Clinton was being sued. The bizarre definition they settled on allowed Monica to be having sex with Clinton while Clinton was not having sex with Monica, and being a lawyer by training, Clinton used the definition to answer in his favor. (They defined having sex as touching an erotic part but did not include having an erotic part touched, so you’d have had sex if you gave a blowjob but not if you merely received one.)
So, let’s call Reker’s “I did not have sex with that man” statement what it really is, “the Monica defense” or maybe “the Clinton defense”. I’d go for the term “the Monica defense” – no need to use a term that might be embarrassing for Hillary.
Trophime
Team Jo-Vanni!
Do we have t-shirts?
Stay in school, Geo!
B
It’s interesting (and statistically unlikely) that posts 1 to 10 all received one negative rating. Could those all be from the same person (maybe even Rekers himself or one of his supporters)?
B
No. 9 · Sam wrote, “That’s it? A daily rub-down? I was expecting something more kinky. Who the hell brings a prostitute to Europe for one sensual massage a day?”
… someone who has trouble getting it up and who wants someone ready and available should the unexpected happen … at least,
that’s my rather cynical guess (if you are going to disrespect Rekers, do it right).
escortethic
Sad, pathetic hooker who’s looking for his shot at being a ‘hero’ through manipulation of the media and others.
Obiwan
Before this news, I admit I had not heard of George Alan Rekers. He is definitely a big fish in the religious right, and he has been and expert in cases (for the opponents of gays adopting children) in legal cases in Arkansas and Florida. He claims to be a Christian with all the evangelical beliefs in the infallibility of Scripture. According to Scripture, he has to stop lying and admit he is gay. It would also be Biblical if he goes before national TV and apologizes to all the people he has duped with his hypocrisy, and to the people he has both directly and indirectly terrorized with his false teachings. If he claims to believe the Bible, he will have plenty to face in the afterlife for being such a __________ ____________!
jeffree
Rekers is twisting in the wind. Whether it was the “long stroke” or a “short stroke” he got his luggage carried & his “sac handled” by a 24/7 “travel companion” and his lies about the vacation, the “cure” for homosexuality & his *very*questionable adoption of a 16 year old male need to be brought 2 light.
Preacher Professsor Rekers’ only way to save himself now will be to claim entrapment or to undergo “reparative therapy” –you know, the same crap he advocated in his books, testimony, and articles! He can now join the awesome club with guys like Ted Haggard, the drunk driver congressman from California & the senator (?) who tickled & groped his male staff members !
Whenever youre having a bad day, all you have to do to cheer yourself up is say to yourself is “I am so glad I’m NOT George Alan Rekers.”
robert
interessant boys
av
beautiful