six pack attack

If Conservatives Have a Problem With ‘Activist Judges’ Overturning Laws, Take It Up With Antonin Scalia

[flv: 650 400]

While Barney Frank is pleased to see Prop 8 be struck down by a Republican-appointed federal judge, he tells Ben & Dave’s Six Pack that he’s focused on Gill et al. v. Office of Personnel Management and Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. HHS, the Massachusetts case that saw DOMA’s Section 3 struck down, and which is expected to move through the courts quicker than Perry v. Schwarzenegger.

And as for conservatives bitching that Judge Vaughn Walker legislating from the bench, Frank says it’s actually the conservative judges on the Supreme Court whom are tearing up the rules.

Listen to the new podcast above, subscribe via iTunes, and check our their archives at Queerty is pleased to power the Six Pack‘s Top To Bottom.

Get Queerty Daily

Subscribe to Queerty for a daily dose of #barneyfrank #ben&dave'ssixpack #benharvey stories and more


  • L.


  • ewe

    Scalia should recuse himself because he has openly admitted he is homophobic and he uses his religious dogma to justify inequality. There is no question that he is incapable of impartiality. Judge Walker on the other hand can separate himself from the issue.

  • Josh

    Would you say “them are tearing up the rules”? No, you’d say “they are tearing up the rules”. Nominative case. So why have you written “whom are tearing up the rules”?? It’s only ‘whom’ when NOT in the nominative or genitive cases, e.g. “whom did you see?” (accusative) or “to whom did you give that present?” (dative).

    In any case, you look like less of a dick if you just write ‘who’, rather than using ‘whom’ incorrectly.

Comments are closed.