Controversial author JK Rowling kicked off the year 2022 with yet another blow to her legacy. A school in Essex, UK has dropped the author’s name from a house for its students. The reason: Rowling’s continued transphobic views.
The Boswells School in Chelmsford, Essex, had initially announced it would name a house for Rowling. This week, however, The Daily Mail reports that Boswells School had replaced Rowling’s name with that of British Olympian Dame Kelly Holmes.
Boswells School had announced it would review the decision to name the house after Rowling last summer, following a deluge of complaints from students and parents. In a newsletter, the school further elaborated on its decision to strike Rowling’s name from the building.
Related: Wonder Woman Lynda Carter throws shade at JK Rowling
How about we take this to the next level?
Our newsletter is like a refreshing cocktail (or mocktail) of LGBTQ+ entertainment and pop culture, served up with a side of eye-candy.
“The Boswells House System embeds a sense of community, friendship and healthy competition amongst both students and staff,” the school declared in its newsletter. “Following numerous requests by students and staff we are reviewing the name of our red house ‘Rowling’ and in light of J.K Rowling’s comments and viewpoints surrounding trans people. Her views on this issue do not align with our school policy and school beliefs – a place where people are free to be.”
Rowling, 56, rose to fame as the creator of the beloved Harry Potter stories. In recent years, she’s earned a reputation as an ardent anti-transgender activist, criticizing gender-neutral rhetoric, arguing against the inclusion of transgender women in women’s restrooms, and endured accusations of reinforcing transgender stereotypes for including a cross-dressing killer in her novel Troubled Blood. Her remarks have gained wide condemnation from the stars of the Harry Potter film series.
Rowling, for her part, denies any anti-transgender bias, insisting that she believes sex, not gender, should be the determining factor for legal rights and protections.
Fahd
What goes around comes around. The British government also should withdraw her O.B.E.
tallskin4
Withdraw her OBE? For what? Saying that cross dressing kinksters cannot become women?
Most people in the UK would find removing her OBE an outrageous thing to do.
Chutes
@tallskin4: clearly, you need to educate yourself on trans women from more legitimate sources.
I’m sure you’d not be so quick to defend her when you realize that the people she constantly platforms are also anti-gay, lesbian, bi.
tallskin4
Chutes, oh so I need to educate myself on trans identified men do I ??
Of course, right away. I’ll turn myself in to the nearest re-education centre immediately!
In the meantime, whilst I have your attention, let me ask you:
1) Which people does she “constantly platform” who are anti-gay, lesbian, bi ?
2) what do these people she “constantly platforms” say exactly that is anti-gay, lesbian, bi ?
Hank31
What came around? This week, 25 elite girls’ schools in the UK announced that they would not admit biological males who claim to be girls. Biological females who imagine themselves to be boys can remain enrolled.
If anything, the UK is “coming around” to JKR’s clear-headed thinking about sex and gender. #LGB4JKR
DarkZephyr
@tallskin4
Do you believe that all trans people are “cross dressing kinksters”? You believe that a sexual kink is what motivates each and every trans person?
inbama
@ DarkZephyr
(1) That is what the entire endless attack on Rowling was about. She came to the defense of a woman who lost her job for describing a bearded man as “a bearded man.” Just before New Years, the case went to court and settled in favor of the woman.
(2) Check your “transgender umbrella.” The feminine transsexuals, attracted to men, and known to most gay guys, are not the problem to women. We’re now seeing more and more hetero guys – sort of trans incels – who do NOT do bottom surgery (like tallskin said – they’re just crossdressers) and are demanding sex from ACTUAL lesbians. Do you think lesbians are bigots because they don’t want anything to do with penis?
DarkZephyr
@inbama
So if YOU were to answer the simple yes or no question that I asked Tallskin4, the answer would be a big “no”. Thing is, I asked Tallskin4.
As for your question about lesbians, no I don’t think lesbians or anyone else are bigots for sticking to their genital preferences. Most trans people that I know feel the same way. The ones who don’t are in the minority despite how loudly they might trumpet on twitter, yet they sure do get brought up a lot by those unsympathetic to the trans community. That is dirty pool as far as I’m concerned.
maeflower73
Agreed
barryaksarben
tallski you need to rethink that hat choice as it is rather fem on you. Try going on line and you can find the pic Im thinking of. It is Norma Shearer in “The Women” a movie you would have been cast in as it had zero men in it. Try less lipstick too
Openminded
Just another example of why it is NEVER a good idea to name anything after a living person. Responsible authorities always wait until a reasonable period of time AFTER a person is deceased before considering them for such rewards.
James Hart
I’m a gay man and I agree with most of the sentiments expressed by JK Rowling. Most of the people who criticize her are disparaging the gains biological women – women who have xx chromosomes – have made over the last 50 years.
I do not dispute that there are biological men who believe that they are actually women. I have some characteristics that many would associate with women, but no one should delude themselves into thinking that individuals who have xy chromosomes should be allowed the same protections as individuals with xx chromosomes, such as competing on the same sports teams.
Chutes
It’s a patently false that most people criticizing her are anti cis- women. They’re calling out Rowling’s completely irrational and continued fear-mongering that accepting trans women as women somehow takes away the rights of cis-women.
The overwhelming criticism of Rowling isn’t that she holds those beliefs, it’s that she’s using her status to platform these virulent anti-trans activists unprovoked and when people push back on disgusting fallacies (ie trans women only want access to cis-women spaces to as**ult them) she then portrays herself as a victim.
tallskin4
Chutes,
Do you honestly believe trans women are really women?
Or are you just being polite and kind and really think the phrase “TWAW” is just metaphorical?
DarkZephyr
@James Hart
Everyone should be treated equally, regardless of chromosomes.
Cam
How to spot a troll…
Starts of with saying “I’m a woman but……then says something anti-woman.
Or “I’m a lesbian but….before saying something against lesbians.
Your troll game, under all your screenames is sad and weak.
maeflower73
You sound just like those who in the past and present say gay people should not be allowed to play sports on the same teams as straight people or even further back when People of Color were not allowed to play on White sports teams.. what about people born with XXY chromosomes? They are born with an xtra chromosome and both sets of genitalia…
RoughRugger
You SERIOUSLY need to do some actual research using actual legitimate sources that practice actual legitimate science…’cuz essentially nothing you predicated your bigotry on has any basis in scientific fact.
tallskin4
and those of us who find the entire transgender thing to be utter woo woo, should take a look at a recent argument on UK Talk radio
just go to youtube and type in the search “james max Kellie Jay keen on Talk Radio”
go see and enjoy watching a pro trans woke bro totally demolished by a feisty, intelligent woman!
Support JK Rowlings and support women and lesbians
cliche guevara
The last time you directed us to an external source (a podcast) it said the exact opposite of what you said it did. And when that was pointed out you up and disappeared for months. How about you jump to the part where you hide under a rock? It will less humiliating than your sad attempts at trolling.
tallskin4
cliche guevara
Is this same cliche guevara who dementedly says that anyone who opposes his pre-digested views about blokes who cross dress is a sock puppet account? How many times, for how many different people, have you accused of doing that on here now?
Still, I suppose we should expect a certain degree of mental ill health, since anyone who truly believes TWAW is not totally sane.
cliche guevara
Not so good on the reading comprehension? I said you were a troll, I never said anything anything about sock puppet accounts. Cam is the person that thinks you are all the same nutter. I just keep pointing out the trolls here just aren’t very good at trolling. Thanks for demonstration!
SamB
Cliche: Please please learn to understand what people are saying. You have a habit of only reading what you think is valid. You need to learn what context means.
cliche guevara
SamB –
Weak swing as always. Better luck next time.
tallskin4
cliche guevara
Rather than you constantly throw abuse at people who attack your silly delusions, why don’t you tell the assembled crowd watching here whether you really believe cross dressing blokes with a sexual kink called autogyniphilia have really changed their sex?
Are trans women women?
Go on, say you think so and make us all chuckle
Cam
Sweetie, it’s cute how you ONLY bring this screename out when there is ANYTHING to do with transgender people.
We get it, you’re obsessed with them.
tallskin4
Great news here in England. A fanatical trans supporter, gay man, Dr Adrian Harrop who doxxed gender critical women, and was an utter bully was found guilty by the General Medical Council of the UK of ““deplorable.. intimidating women..”and guilty of misconduct,” and has been suspended for a month, which might not sound much but which will always be on his record! His career as a doctor is effectively over. Good riddance as he is a nasty piece of work
Yay, a victory!
What is it with certain gay men who go doo lally over trans identified men, and throw lesbians and women under the bus? Most trans identified MEN are heterosexual for goodness sake. We gays owe them and their sexual kinks nothing
tallskin4
Little girl: “Mummy, where do trans women come from??”
Mummy: “Well darling, when a man loves himself very very much!”
Hank31
lol. The lazy writers at Queerty are over-using the “So and so’s week/month/year is not going well!” headline. They don’t know how to write original content.
No one cares about some primary school’s residence’s name. JKR has no affiliation with that school and her legacy is not dependent upon some signage which almost no one on Earth was aware of.
In fact, the pettiness and smallness of the retaliation against her (one sign in a primary school, a bunch of “Quidditch” players changing their name, which they needed to do anyway to avoid a trademark dispute), it shows how very little negative reaction there has been to her speaking out.
cliche guevara
The irony of Hank comparing about people not being able to write original content is delicious.
Kangol2
Miss Hank31 girl, Queerty got you to comment on this article more than once, so Queerty’s headline writers must be doing their jobs!
Jack
We need to listen to tallskin4! He knows more about women’s genitals than anyone I’ve ever heard from…. because he literally IS a douche. A real douche come to life. Such a pitiful troll.
tallskin4
Jack, why exactly am I a ‘douche’?
Am I a ‘douche’ because i say biological sex exists?
Fahd
When all is said and done, her O.B.E. really should be rescinded. With her commitment to “her cause”, she herself may no longer consider her values as compatible with those of the Order. It might be a mutual thing.
tallskin4
Fahd, ““her cause” – do you mean by that her support for women?
As she’s said repeatedly:
Dress however you please.
Call yourself whatever you like.
Sleep with any consenting adult who’ll have you.
Live your best life in peace and security.
But force women out of their jobs for stating that sex is real?
That doesn’t seem too bad a philosophy to me. Why do you object to it?
cliche guevara
TERFs are the greatest output of misogyny. The fact that some women have become the brown shirted foot soldiers of patriarchy while claiming they are feminists is truly something. It’s a lost cause though, as the Billy Bragg song goes, “all you fascists are bound to lose”.
Yeah, it’s technically a Woody Guthrie song, but Braggy made it famous and is probably a better reference for the English.
Also, Braggy expertly trolled the anti-trans crowed recently by uttering the pronoun “they” on TV. The little minds just had a meltdown.
tallskin4
Cliche,
people like you honestly think that a millionaire cross dressing bloke is higher up the oppressed ladder than some single mum living in poverty in a tower block in Hackney.
Most trans identified men are heterosexual, so why are they of any interest to gays and lesbians?
cliche guevara
“people like you honestly think that a millionaire cross dressing bloke is higher up the oppressed ladder than some single mum living in poverty in a tower block in Hackney.”
This is a straw man fallacy and doesn’t need to be addressed pointing that out.
“Most trans identified men are heterosexual, so why are they of any interest to gays and lesbians?”
I’m not sure what you mean by “trans identifying men” it sounds like a term made up by someone is just being obstinate and refuses to say trans woman or trans man. In a good faith effort to answer your question I’ll assume you are talking about trans people in general.
I think minorities and marginalized groups should be stood up for and that their sexuality is entirely irrelevant. Your question could easily be changed to say “Most black people are heterosexual, so why are they of any interest to gays and lesbians?” I don’t need someone to be like me for their well being to be of interest to me. I will always stand with human rights and human dignity.
DarkZephyr
@tallskin4
Where are women forced out of their jobs for uttering the phrase “sex is real”?
inbama
@DarkZephyr
PS Some of these “trans lesbians with penises” don’t even bother to crossdress. Google “Alex Drummond trans lesbian” and see for yourself.
You can no longer expect what were once gay and lesbian institutions or news sources to accurately tell you what’s being promoted in our name.
cliche guevara
@inbama
I have friends, family and co-workers that are straight cis-gendered women. They will dress in jeans and a t-shirt. I also wear jeans and t-shirts. Are they crossdressing or am I?
Your focus on trans woman and antiquated idea of gender performance via clothing really underscores the sexism that is behind transphobia.
Also, trans people are doing anything in your name and they owe you nothing.
tallskin4
Cliche, you say “I think minorities and marginalized groups should be stood up for and that their sexuality is entirely irrelevant” – well to homophobes OUR sexuality is not irrelevant, hence the whole evil phenomenon of “tranzing away the gay” as is practised by homophobic hell holes like Iran, or in the USA where evil homophobic parents like those of Jazz Jennings, who couldn’t stand the idea of having a gay son whisked him off to the clinic and had him snipped.
So now his parents parade this mutilated gay teen like some circus freak on the TV to make money.
The kid is now grossly unhappy, suffers serious mental health issues, is obese because he’s so unhappy.
And to a certain extent this is all down to halfwits like you who whoop and cheer trans ideology and provide the bedrock for this ‘trans away the gay’ homophobia. For girls it’s just as evil, thousands of young women who are undoubtedly lesbian have their breasts sliced off because fools like you urge them to do so out of support for trans ideology.
Stop this affirmation nonsense and tell gay and lesbian kids they are fine as they are and being gay is good.
cliche guevara
Equating informed consent to being forced to go through a medical procedures and rolling it into being trans is disingenuous at best and more likely straight up intellectual dishonest.
DarkZephyr
@inbama
What has that to do with my question asking where it is that women are being forced out of their jobs for uttering the phrase “Sex is real”?
cuteguy
I will never understand why some get “cancelled” and others don’t for the same infraction. Wendy Williams has made transphobic remarks recently, and yet she does not get the same backlash as JK does. Why is that? In fact, WW is even idolized by some in the lgbtq community, most notably gay men. Transphobia should be condemned by all who commit it, not just targeted towards some.
tallskin4
Cuteguy- What is “transphobia”?
“Transphobia” seems a catch-all phrase.
Is it “transphobia” to say trans women are not women?
Since 98% of trans women neither take hormones or have any surgery, (nor intend to) Is it “transphobia” to say “Men stay out of women’s spaces” cos it seems quite reasonable to me?
Is it “transphobia” to say lesbians don’t like male genitals and refuse to include people with male genitals in their dating pool?
it is “transphobia” for gay men to refuse to date people with female genitals in our dating pool?
I don’t think you’ve thought this through. When you have given it some thought come back.
tallskin4
If trans-women are not women, everything falls apart. As soon as you question this core belief you see this movement for what it is – men controlling women, men gaslighting women, men controlling women, men abusing women.
That’s why trans and their fans keep on and on and on and on repeating the mantra that trans women are women.
cliche guevara
On the contrary, the idea of a man giving up his power and privilege in patriarchal society is unthinkable and it a threat the entire system. This is why you, Rowling and every transphobic person in this thread only ever focus on trans women. Based on way you all talk a person could walk away with the the impression the only trans people are trans women. Why do none you express the same virtual for trans men? The answer is fairly simple. Women transition to become men makes sense as they are moving toward power and privilege. Even TERFs while having “Trans Exclusion” in their name embrace and support trans men. There is no objection to the notion that trans men are men it’s only trans women that get singled out. It’s misogyny through and through.
DarkZephyr
Whether or not “trans women are women” is a truly moot point in this particular argument. The problem with most people who feel that trans women are not women is not their bigoted view point in of itself. Bigots will be bigots and haters are gonna hate. The problem is the falsehood that they spread that accepting trans women as women is an attack on the rights of women. It isn’t. I’m not sure what it is exactly that is supposed to be “falling apart” but whatever it is, its unrelated to the real problem that JK Rowling helps to cause and spread. The average trans woman wants to live her own life, she doesn’t want to “control and abuse women”. Until fairly recently, the trans community hasn’t had much of a voice. Until fairly recently they have largely been powerless. And yet trans people have existed for ages, long before the so called “trans tipping point”. So the idea that they exist solely to control and abuse women is absurdly preposterous. Having the power to control ANYONE at all, let alone their own damned lives, has been something they have VERY much been lacking over the decades. They have only just begun to be a political force. And yet somehow, ALL this time, its been ALL about abusing, gaslighting and controlling women. Yep, that’s why Leelah Alcorn jumped in front of that truck back in 2014. Because she was overcome with the overwhelming desire to “control and abuse women”. What a crock of horse sh**.
tallskin4
Cliche, you are such a disengenuous devious rat! But you know that, don’t you?
We are talking about trans identified blokes because that’s what the argument has been about on here! To then imply that we who oppose the bullying of women by trans-identified men are enforcing the patriarchy is just more of your devious, bad faith, disingenuous nonsense, which you no doubt think is the height of cleverness!
This is the same ill considered nonsense that leads to silly gay men going Whoop Whoop over blokes in dresses little realising the harm you do to camp boys and butch girls.
And as usual you’re lying. I have crossed swords with you and your silliness months ago when we argued directly on queerty about girls who tranisition into being “men”- remember the Keira bell case?
cliche guevara
I was happy to engage in actual civil discussion when you dropped on the personal attacks but apparently maintaining a civil conversation is beyond your abilities. It speaks to how weak your stance is that you have to constantly fall back on on insults. Best of luck to you.
cuteguy
@cliche guevara
@tallskin is a toxic individual who takes out his aggression on here. Ignore him. Ppl like that need serious help but are probably too damaged or too narcissistic to get it
cliche guevara
@cuteguy
Yeah, I gave that more attention than it deserved.
IvanPH
JK Rowling is criticizing letting biological males access women’s restrooms and locker rooms where they can go around naked with their erect genitals. She is also criticizing allowing rapists who are biological males but identify as women from being incarcerated with biological women.
How are these transphobic?!
cliche guevara
“JK Rowling is criticizing letting biological males access women’s restrooms and locker rooms where they can go around naked with their erect genitals.”
There are no shortage of places that have allowed people access to restrooms and locker rooms based on their gender indemnity for decades and not the gender they were assigned at birth and this has not been an issue.
“She is also criticizing allowing rapists who are biological males but identify as women from being incarcerated with biological women.”
No she didn’t. She crated the police in Scotland for documenting people’s gender identity when they were arrested. Neither the police nor Rowling said anything about incarcerating rapists with women. This is a falsehood that people using as a scare tactic.
scottsingsbari
It seems to me that those in support of Rowling are equating cross-dressing with being transgender. You’re also focusing on men dressing as women and are mostly silent on the reverse.
What I’ve seen as far as those criticizing or even assaulting transwomen appears to be rooted in misogyny. I mean, why would a man ever want to dress as a woman or even go further to pursue a medical change to become a woman physically?
In general, because of their overall physique (e.g. height, facial shape, shoulder width, etc.), it is often easier to tell a transwoman but the same is not always true for transmen. As a result, transmen present as men and few people ever doubt or criticize the gender they present to the world. A 6-foot+ tall transwoman will nearly always have someone questioning whether they were born male and, as a result, they are perceived as less than…as other.
Here in the states, we hear about transwomen who are beaten or murdered because they are trans and presenting as a woman. We rarely hear about a transmen being similarly assaulted. In my belief that is because transmen look like men. The blatant misogyny there is that if you look like a man, you’re golden. If you look like a man dressing as a woman, you’re worthy of abuse, ridicule or even murder.
The harm that Rowling and others with a TERF mindset do is that they are imposing their personal opinions and belief on the world as an absolute truth without accepting the fact that humans are highly variable and are not 100% one thing or another means that there should be room to accept that there will be those who don’t map to a single view or understanding of gender.
Rather than point us to a talk show (which is typically a bunch of a$$es spouting their opinions without fact), point us to actual research and science that support a position that trans is not a valid gender expression. If you cannot, then you’re just another a$$ spouting your opinion without actual knowledge.
tallskin4
“I mean, why would a man ever want to dress as a woman or even go further to pursue a medical change to become a woman physically?”
Jesus christ man, look up Autogynephilia !! How can you be so ignorant?
Well, I know how. It’s cos you’re brainwashed. And you take at face value the endless bat urine stream of lies pouring out of the mouths of trans and their fans
Trans lie about trans suicide rates.
Trans lie about trans murder rates- here in the UK there has been on trans woman murdered over the past 10 years, and the stats for trans identified men murdered in the USA is not much higher (it is higher cos your general murder rate is much higher than in europe, but in percentage/proportion terms, it’s actually lower than the murder rate for women and men)
Trans lie about the effects of the toxic drugs they take, saying these do not rot the heart and bones
Trans lie about the effect of puberty blockers being reversible- these effects are NOT reversible
Trans lie very vociferously about the number of kids and adults who DE-transition
You have to be so careful not to be conned by these liars
tallskin4
i AM GOING TO QUOTE THIS FROM ANOTHER UK GENDER CRITICAL GAY MAN ON TWITTER AS HE SUMS UP PERFECTLY THE GENDER/WOKE TRANS HOMOPHOBIA.
I’ve recently seen a number of SW’s useful idiots appearing on Twitter claiming that (as gay men) they would, of course, date trans men (David Paisley is a case in point). The great thing about this statement is that it is always hypothetical. A claim easily made but one that never has to be lived up to. It’s a grift to make other gay men, those of us who are willing to be clear that we are exclusively attracted to males, appear to be “unkind”, it plays into the (homophobic) “genital fethishist” trope that has sprung up recently, and it gives the claimant the moral high ground by claiming that he “sees the person” while the rest of us are just focused on sex. But here’s the thing. What this idea does is make a mockery of everything gays and lesbians have fought for over the years If it really was “just about the person” why would any of us have felt so compelled to risk everything – our friends, our family, our jobs – to come out, declare who and what we were and to live our lives according to how we need to live them? If it really was “just about the person” we could have saved ourselves all that if only we had found that right person. There would be no need for any of us to ever have to come out. And that’s why this is such a terrible thing to say to lesbians and gay men. t’s just what our parents said to us when we came out to them. It’s what society thought of us when it wanted us to shut up. But so strong was our conviction about how we were “wired up” that gay men particularly have been risking arrest, imprisonment, disgrace for centuries because of who and what we are. Would we do that if all it took was finding the “right person”? Finally, and most upsettingly about this convenient, self-righteous lie, is that there are gay men and lesbians alive today who do not have the luxury of living in the west with all the freedoms that provides. They live in countries where they can be arrested, imprisoned, killed by their families or by the state and STILL their need to live as same-sex attracted men is so great that they are as compelled to be gay as I am. I can live no other way. It’s not just about the right person for me, it’s about the right man. Always has been. So that’s why I view that statement as a lie and also a betrayal. A betrayal of all the gay men and lesbians who have gone before us and risked everything so we could be free to live our lives in peace and freedom. And a betrayal of all the gay men and lesbians alive today who do not have the freedom we enjoy to live their lives as they are compelled to do so and yet do so anyway. Who I am attracted to is not just a matter of “finding the right person”. It’s homophobic emotional blackmail. It was bad enough when straight people said it. It’s worse now that gender ideology has gone so far that gay men and lesbians are now saying it to each other.”
I AM SURE I AM NOT ALONE IN FINDING IN JK ROWLINGS A STRAIGHT ALLY, IN A COMMON CAUSE, AGAINST ALL THIS TRANSGENDER WOO WOO, MISOGYNY AND HOMOPHOBIA
scottsingsbari
I get it. You don’t believe trans people exist and that people who transition are actually doing themselves permanent harm.
You’re arrogant enough to assert that anyone who disagrees with you is brainwashed and that to get on the same page as you, we need to get educated so that we can think as you do and until we do, we are idiots and any other insulting term you want to levy at people who don’t agree with you.
Sounds a lot like what we would consider a troll.
Cam
I love counting how enraged and obsessed the same old right wing troll account gets whenever there is ANYTHING about transgender people.
Not only will it bring in multiple screenames, but it obviously got unhinged and over posted under it’s “Tallskin” name.
Reminds me of the right wingers that supposedly hate gay people then get caught with male prostitutes.
Canadiancub
Get a hobby
Ronbo
Cam has a hobby: he insists that everyone who has a different opinion is the same person. It’s not much of a hobby; but, it keeps him off the streets.
DannyParks
Wow, if only we lived in a world were everyone was entitled to their own opinions…
J K Rowling gets to have hers and Queerty and its commenters and the rest of the world get to have theres. Equality – that thing we all claim to be fighting for.
@ Queerty, isn’t there that saying that there is no bad thing as bad publicity? Stop fueling the hate for both sides! Come up with a new story!
People shouldn’t be bullied into changing their beleifs, whichever side of an opinion they are on. All we can do is respect and educate each other.
Over and out.
DarkZephyr
When people with a gigantic platform spread misinformation that brings harm to a vulnerable subset of people, they definitely need to be called out. This is about far more than just “opinions”.
DannyParks
@DarkZephyr – I disagree. Your term ”missinformation” is another opinion. I will agree that people with large social platforms should use their influence responsibly. Like the charity, Lumos that J K Rowling set up. A way of using her platform responsibly yet never seems to make it on to these Queerty stories…
Unfortunately we live in the age of social media narcissism were everyone wants their opinions to be heard and play the victim if they are not.
DarkZephyr
Dude. She claims that acceptance of trans women AS women will somehow bring injury to women’s rights. Its not my “opinion” that she says that, its a fact that she does.
Your cavalier attitude about it and your desire to hide JK Rowling’s bigotry and discrimination by trying to eclipse it with mentions of charity work she has done tells me that you either know very little about what the trans community has had to endure over the decades OR you just don’t give a shit. I just hope its not something even worse, such as you actually detesting the trans community and finding joy in any suffering they might endure or any harm that might come to them as a result of the propaganda that Rowling spreads.
Sorry Charlie, but any charity work she does is rat’s urine compared to the massive harm she causes the trans community. She is a bully and you support her.
DannyParks
Do you realise that a majority of your response / argument to me is for something I in no way insinuated or noted in my previous comments. So let me make this clear – I DO NOT have any hateful or sinister thoughts or intentions to the trans community. No one has the right to dictate how anyone else should think or live their lives, regardless of gender, race, sexual orientation. Do not put words in my mouth.
She has made comments. Not all of which I agree with but some do have merit which I can see logic in. Those are my opinions and it is my right to have them. It’s her right to have her’s and it’s your right to have yours. There is no need to point your agression at me or J K Rowling because we have different perspectives of some scearios.
The fact is she did alot of good things (like turning a few generations of childre on to reading, starting childrens charities etc). As you said that means nothing to you but some of us (and I’m sure even some fof the trans community) can admit and respect her for that.
You are angry and ignorant to people whose opinions that don’t match your own. I will not be acknowledging or replying to any more of your comments / responses.
DarkZephyr
OK, so its that you just don’t give a shit.
Trust me bruh, I will lose NO sleep over your tail between your legs pledge to never speaking to me again, seeing as this is the only exchange we have ever had.
JK Rowling is a dangerous bully with blood on her hands and you support her. Period.
Have a great life.
Ronbo
DannyParks is right about Dark Z. Toxic individuals seems to need an enemy – even if they must lie about it.
Sotzume
As one of those older gay men who risked everything to come out over fifty years ago and who spent a good part of my youth, attempting to educate homophobes, I find the whole issue of transgendered people “deja vu all over again”. The exact same arguments that I heard ad nauseam when I was growing up and after I came out at 17, are just retreads applied to transgendered people and specifically and overwhelmingly about transgendered women. Some of the specifics have been rerouted…one being that transgendered women are actually just predators salivating until they can run into women’s locker rooms to attack them is the same argument made about gay men salivating until they could run into men’s and boy’s locker rooms to attack them. Same old, same old…and then the trolls find one example and beat it to death. Yawn. I hope, that like all the lies, fears, and paranoia about gay men that now seem outrageous will eventually happen to the current lies, fears and paranoias surrounding transgendered women. JK Rowling is no more an expert about sex and gender than anyone else. Her opinion is only listened to because she is very rich and famous because of her fairy tale books. Her paranoia is unfounded just like all those going mad about the “damage” transgendered women are doing to the universe. Its laughable really. I have sincere hope that as time goes on, as more people come out as transgendered, as the world gets used to it, these fears will be revealed as the foolishness they are. I only know a few transgendered women personally but those women are quite ordinary with all the ordinary likes, dislikes, and mishugas that the every other human being experiences. They aren’t attacking cis women, taking away gold medals from athletes, or causing the end of civilization as we know it.
Inspector 57
Well written, Sotzume. Thank you.
OhPlease
Having been the victim of attempted rape by a crossdressing former supervisor, it happens. Another coworker at another job was a transitioning m-to-f who was a VERY prolific and aggressive sexual harasser in and out of the building. He once drugged and raped a straight male supervisor at a party which led to that man’s resignation ahead of firing in Texas (this was an Apple subcontractor).
There are in fact many legal cases involving crossdressing and transgendered sex offenders, they as a whole are so mentally unstable that they do in fact require supervision. And I say this as an avowed supporter of that community’s legal rights.
MHaumesser
As I’ve said before JK Rollings is worth an estimated $1 billion! That’s billion with a B! That amount is continuously growing every time a book, movie or amusement park ride no matter what it is that has Harry Potter attached to it she gets her cut in that. So I really doubt she cares what anyone thinks about what she has to say about trans people!
DarkZephyr
So in other words, you glory and rejoice in her huge anti-trans platform that brings harm to the trans community.
Ronbo
DZ Advocating for women is not advocating against trans individuals.
The world isn’t binary. Standing up and advocating for women is NOT attacking trans individuals. Please try to think in a way that is not binary – or over-simplified. JKR can advocate for women, just as you advocate for TW.
When you advocate for TW, do you advocate against women? No. One can believe that the female sex is real without demeaning TW. They are both real and worthy of love and praise.
Halfnhalf
why are my comments awaiting moderation? what does that mean? Are you cancelling my comments? You know I have the actual scientific facts. If Queerty doesn’t want me to comment, fine. It takes up all of my time trying to inform people.
LeBlevsez
My experience has been that an attempt to edit after hitting the post button results in “moderation” and lost posts. Hope this helps.
DarkZephyr
Yes you might be attempting to edit your post. What I do instead, when I feel like I need to edit, is I copy the post, delete it before the 5 minute mark is up, paste it into a new post and make my corrections, and then post it as a brand new post. That way it doesn’t get stuck in moderation hell.
twomen4u
This is coming from my HS days, the easiest way to hurt a bookseller is not to buy her books, any of them. This hurts where it counts, in her pocketbook.
waldorf
Why these attacks on Rowling for stating the obvious?
A left wing rag in the U.K., The Guardian, ran a poll for the ‘Person of the Year’, they pulled it when JK Rowling was leading by a mile! Clearly the vast majority of the U.K. population support her and not the attacks on her.
DarkZephyr
And not especially long ago in the grand scheme of things, the vast majority of the UK supported homophobia. So…what’s your point?
iminheatlikeacat
A slow, sarcastic clap to the decision made by this school to replace JK Rowling with Kelly Holmes, a woman who is outspoken on Twitter about the importance of recognising that biology is real and that those that are born men should not participate in those that are born women’s sports.
I mean, if this doesn’t prove they aren’t just jumping on a bandwagon without actually researching the decisions they make, I’m not sure what does…
inbama
It is as lunatic as the University of Wisconsin spending fifty grand to relocate a “racist rock.”
redzebra1
The quicker actual contracts and so on are cancelled on her, then she’ll really get bitten off her money. Boycotting is a right, which some transphobes here seem to forget. No one is obliged to help JKR with her making money. The sooner we read about her selling assets the better. So far she’s still getting away with her bigotry.
One rule for them, one rule…..
Ronbo
Please quote her “bigotry”.
Remember, “some people say…” is how FOX puts false information into the ether.
Quote JKR’s actual “bigotry”. Advocating for women’s rights doesn’t make one a bigot.
OhPlease
I have to agree with Rowling as do most gays. There is no factual evidence that the transgendered community are “trapped in the wrong body” unless they can prove hormonal imbalances that can in fact affect brain activity. It can be determined through MRIs and blood tests, hormonal imbalances are linked to heart disease among other serious medical problems.
Most of this crowd are profoundly, sometimes dangerously, mentally ill folks who are seeking an identity much as they cycle through a variety of extremist cults. This is their key defining trait.
Intrauterine estrogen flooding is now scientifically accepted as a cause of male homosexuality, as is natal progesterone exposure in women. There is no proof of this in many “transgendered” persons nor will it ever be sought because it is a lucrative political front. Why?
One, all it is doing is legally allowing insurance companies to deny care to severely mentally ill persons, and two, it allows drug companies to profiteer from massively overpriced and harmful treatments. These fronts are massive political donors AND major media corporation ad funders.
In the US reassignment surgery typically requires a MINIMUM of two to three years of very expensive psychiatric care to determine if the patient is even mentally stable enough to survive surgery and hormone therapy which can in fact induce suicidality. Most are denied for this reason and also to prevent them from engaging in prostitution or other criminal activity to fund the surgeries since not all insurers cover it (nor should they if it is not linked to a demonstrable disorder). It’s essentially body dysmorphia hiding other problems.
Patients must also be able to live without expensive, often destructive psych meds which are increasingly highly addictive with a “street value.”
The real problem? Most of these folks eventually suicide out directly by discernible attempts or through slow patterns of drug and alcohol abuse.
Who wins? Drug companies and insurance corporations and the political hacks who are playing this scam to the hilt!
If you want to debate this, call up Johns Hopkins or other research facilities which do the surgeries and ask how many patients requests reversals within a five year period…..
redzebra1
“Most of this crowd are profoundly, sometimes dangerously, mentally ill folks who are seeking an identity much as they cycle through a variety of extremist cults. This is their key defining trait.” Pure transphobic bigotry. No, you don’t represent ‘most gays’ on this matter. Get lost!
Ronbo
@RedZebra1
Please take note that your quote is NOT from JKR. If you have a trans-phobic quote from JRK, please post it.
Advocating for women is NOT inherently “anti-trans”. Stop thinking in binary terms.