Not content to let her cross-dressing brother James get all the attention, Kate Middleton’s sister Pippa has garnered some attention with her own playful pic. Finally, a royal family that’s openly sexy! We had to wait almost a decade for anything sexy to go down after the last royal wedding and even then it was Camilla telling Prince Charles that she wanted to live inside his trousers. Booo-ring.
Image via (NSFW)
Matt Slusarenko
YES! I love the Party Pippa and I love that she single-handedly strong-armed The Queen into allowing Disco Balls into Buckingham Palace. Here’s to the Middleton family continuing to raise the royal roof!
Shannon1981
I hate to be spiteful, but that wasteful, over the top, pretentious display at Westminister Abbey and the resulting media storm irked me. So glad to see something scandalous undermine it. This is more like it. Go Pippa! Ur hot, shake that thang. I’ll gladly look. Where’s the porn tapes?
Steve
That wasteful, over the top, pretentious display at Westminster Abbey, generated millions of pounds/euros/dollars worth of business for London shops. It could have generated more, but the hotels overpriced the advanced reservations, and as a result were not full to capacity.
Public displays that involve underwear or even nudity are much more accepted in Europe than in the US. It is still considered inappropriate for upper-class people, after a certain age. But that age seems to be about 25, any more.
Tim
@Steve:
Agree with that entirely! People don’t seem to realise this.
jason
Pippa should take her clothes off in private, not in public. She seems to lack standards and appears to be a bit of an attention-seeking buffoon.
Our standards ensure that we do what’s right when it’s right. For instance, we don’t cross the road when there is oncoming traffic, we don’t take a dump in our living rooms, we don’t blow our noses all over our clothes. Virtually everything we do is based on morality. It’s necessary and important.
ron
@jason: Not taking a dump in our living rooms has nothing to do with morality. We don’t do it because poo is impossible to get out of chintz.
Cam
@Steve: said..
“That wasteful, over the top, pretentious display at Westminster Abbey, generated millions of pounds/euros/dollars worth of business for London shops. It could have generated more, but the hotels overpriced the advanced reservations, and as a result were not full to capacity.”
_______________________-
1. Or it could have something to do with the fact that 80% of the British public polled didn’t care about the wedding.
2. People were angry that the Taxpayers had to shell out $22 million pounds for it.
Yaël
The royal pageantry of the wedding seemed excessive during a time of a global recession.
Congrats Pippa on keeping it real-ish.
I’m a 5.9 on the Kinsey scale, but I’d join Shannon1981 in watching the racier vids! As for brother James, well, I think he got short shrift in the genetics, but I am sure he is a lovely person inside. That’s what counts!