Hillary Clinton told voters in Pennsylvania last night that her fate’s riding on them: “The last day is here, and the entire world is watching. What’s important today and tomorrow is that we turn out the vote.” [Boston Herald]
Latest on Queerty
Dan Reynolds getting sweaty, Chris Colfer’s “PTSGlee,” & Shawn Mendes on “super beautiful” crop tops
omg i hope its the last day im so sick of her, i hope she goes down in defeat tonight
It is really important to the race (if there is one) that the Democratic fight doesn’t go on any longer, which would probvably happen if she got 50% .
She would be to selfish to pull out if there is the least chance. The damage though to thwe party is irreperable.
By dragging things on she just makes Obamas chance in the final race less decided.
by now everyone knows what they’ll get with her,-it’s not a matter of issues because she and McCain are about the same. Given time, the country willl get a chance to decide on another Bush (mcCain) and a real liberal, Obama (or as close as we’ll ever have in this countries history).
Sadly, I think that Clinton is so hateful(and tied to the republicans) that she would keep running just to damage Obama .
Hillary you’ve already earned my vote on March 4th and I’m anxiously awaiting to vote for you again in November. If not, McCain here we come!!
April 23, 2008
The Low Road to Victory
The Pennsylvania campaign, which produced yet another inconclusive result on Tuesday, was even meaner, more vacuous, more desperate, and more filled with pandering than the mean, vacuous, desperate, pander-filled contests that preceded it.
Voters are getting tired of it; it is demeaning the political process; and it does not work. It is past time for Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton to acknowledge that the negativity, for which she is mostly responsible, does nothing but harm to her, her opponent, her party and the 2008 election.
If nothing else, self interest should push her in that direction. Mrs. Clinton did not get the big win in Pennsylvania that she needed to challenge the calculus of the Democratic race. It is true that Senator Barack Obama outspent her 2-to-1. But Mrs. Clinton and her advisers should mainly blame themselves, because, as the political operatives say, they went heavily negative and ended up squandering a good part of what was once a 20-point lead.
On the eve of this crucial primary, Mrs. Clinton became the first Democratic candidate to wave the bloody shirt of 9/11. A Clinton television ad â€” torn right from Karl Roveâ€™s playbook â€” evoked the 1929 stock market crash, Pearl Harbor, the Cuban missile crisis, the cold war and the 9/11 attacks, complete with video of Osama bin Laden. â€œIf you canâ€™t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen,â€ the narrator intoned.
If that was supposed to bolster Mrs. Clintonâ€™s argument that she is the better prepared to be president in a dangerous world, she sent the opposite message on Tuesday morning by declaring in an interview on ABC News that if Iran attacked Israel while she were president: â€œWe would be able to totally obliterate them.â€
By staying on the attack and not engaging Mr. Obama on the substance of issues like terrorism, the economy and how to organize an orderly exit from Iraq, Mrs. Clinton does more than just turn off voters who donâ€™t like negative campaigning. She undercuts the rationale for her candidacy that led this page and others to support her: that she is more qualified, right now, to be president than Mr. Obama.
Mr. Obama is not blameless when it comes to the negative and vapid nature of this campaign. He is increasingly rising to Mrs. Clintonâ€™s bait, undercutting his own claims that he is offering a higher more inclusive form of politics. When she criticized his comments about â€œbitterâ€ voters, Mr. Obama mocked her as an Annie Oakley wannabe. All that does is remind Americans who are on the fence about his relative youth and inexperience.
No matter what the high-priced political operatives (from both camps) may think, it is not a disadvantage that Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton share many of the same essential values and sensible policy prescriptions. It is their strength, and they are doing their best to make voters forget it. And if they think that only Democrats are paying attention to this spectacle, theyâ€™re wrong.
After seven years of George W. Bushâ€™s failed with-us-or-against-us presidency, all American voters deserve to hear a nuanced debate â€” right now and through the general campaign â€” about how each candidate will combat terrorism, protect civil liberties, address the housing crisis and end the war in Iraq.
It is getting to be time for the superdelegates to do what the Democrats had in mind when they created superdelegates: settle a bloody race that cannot be won at the ballot box. Mrs. Clinton once had a big lead among the party elders, but has been steadily losing it, in large part because of her negative campaign. If she is ever to have a hope of persuading these most loyal of Democrats to come back to her side, let alone win over the larger body of voters, she has to call off the dogs.
Comments are closed.