So upset are patrons of Mainestreet bar in Ogunquit, Maine, they organized a protest after a health inspector told owner Norm Paquin he needed to have bartenders put their shirts back on, because pouring Jack Daniels without one is a “health hazard.” Well, depending on your body hair.
Some 60 white shirts tagged with “Yaffe’s Gaffe” — in reference to town resident Harriet Yaffe, who took issue with the bar’s bare chested guys — were going to be distributed for the rally cry.
In the meantime Code Enforcement Officer Paul Lempicki, who originally cited Mainestreet for the violation, is working with Town Manager Tom Fortier and the Department of Health and Human Services to see if it’s really a violation to have men’s nipples on display behind the bar. And if it isn’t? Fortier says he’ll issue a public apology to the bar.
But might the policy differ from one bartender to the next, depending on whether he’s hairy (and where the hair is)? Seacoast Online posits:
How about we take this to the next level?
Our newsletter is like a refreshing cocktail (or mocktail) of LGBTQ+ entertainment and pop culture, served up with a side of eye-candy.
According to Article 2-402.11(B) in the state’s Food Code, counter staff at an establishment serving food are not required to wear hairnets, beard restraints, hats or clothing that covers body hair. All other employees who work around open food are required to cover up.
[Peggy Albert of HHS] said the counter exception does not apply to Mainestreet’s bartenders, however. “Bartenders are not counter staff,” she said. “They’re really prep staff. They pour open liquor. Because everything is open like that, he has to have some type of hair restraint. If he’s got a hairy chest, he’s got to wear a shirt.” She said if a bartender is hairless on his stomach, back, chest and armpits, then the issue becomes a “local decision.”
Sorry, bears, but it looks like laser hair removal is now a job requirement.
[photo via\
CertainPOV
So, following Peggy Albert’s logic, EVERY bartender in the state of Maine has to wear a hairnet in order to mix a cocktail.
RomanHans
A martini is food? Hey, she can pack my lunch any time.
RJ
Since when have bartenders had to wear hair nets?
Hyhybt
I’ve always wondered about the “no shirt, no shoes, no service” stickers, because they generally say “by order of the health department” in fine print. Why would the health department care one way or the other about whether customers are wearing shirts and shoes? (This article reminded me of that, but doesn’t quite apply even if that’s a legitimate interpretation because it only applies to employees.)
TomDC
@RomanHans
Martini is considered “food” by some (most?) in the restaurant business because it’s something your customers ingest. Similarly, water and ice are also considered “food.”
TomDC
If this decision is upheld, I wonder what they’re going to force long-sleeved shirts on those with overly abundant arm hair…
Hyhybt
I’d love to know why my comment at #4 has a moderation flag on it.
L.
@Hyhybt: I’m guessing it didn’t wear the requisite hairnet.
Amalgam
Some guys like me have hairy hands. So now bartenders have to wear gloves?
Hyhybt
Interesting… this is partly a test, though if anyone has an answer to the question I’d love to hear it. OK, here goes:
I’ve always wondered about the “no shirt, no shoes, no service” stickers, because they generally say “by order of the health department” in fine print. Why would the health department care one way or the other about whether customers are wearing shirts and shoes? (This article reminded me of that, but doesn’t quite apply even if that’s a legitimate interpretation because it only applies to employees.)
Read more: http://www.queerty.com/maines-food-code-discriminates-against-bartenders-with-hairy-chests-pits-backs-20100726/comment-page-1/#comment-327679#ixzz0v2x7cqiW