The gay adult studio Men.com recently released a condomless scene starring a trans male performer (link NSFW). In “Break and Enter Me,” trans performer Tommy Tanner calls a “fantasy service” to have cis performer Ryan Bones come over dressed as a burglar, tie him up and (ahem) burgle him — but it’s all consensual (as the trailer shows).
Tanner isn’t Men.com’s first trans male performer. In February 2019, Men.com unveiled its first trans male scene: It was entitled “He’s Always Hard For Me” and featured cis performer Dante Colle topping trans performer Luke Hudson.
Men.com was actually the third mainstream gay adult studio to feature a trans man. In October 2017, Naked Sword released the The Devil’s Deal & Other Sordid Tales, its first-ever film to feature a trans man, Viktor Belmont, and in 2005, Titan Men featured trans male porn performer Buck Angel in their film Cirque Noir.
Related: Adult son finds tons of gay x-rated videos on his dad’s computer — Now what?!
How about we take this to the next level?
Our newsletter is like a refreshing cocktail (or mocktail) of LGBTQ+ entertainment and pop culture, served up with a side of eye-candy.
It’s actually a big deal to see starring trans men in gay adult videos seeing as trans men have typically gone unacknowledged in the gay sexual imagination and sex spaces. You rarely, if ever, see trans men in adverts for gay gogo bars or bathhouses for instance, which raises the question: why not?
On its face, the answer is obvious: Many gay men don’t sexualize trans men because many trans men still have vaginas, and gay men aren’t always interested in that equipment. In fact, for a long time trans adult performers were ghettoized into trans-only sites and trans-specific video searches on tube sites.
When readers at Zachary Sire’s gay adult industry site complained about Hudson’s scene at Men.com, Sire responded:
It’s one scene out of 365 scenes released this year on Men.com, or in other words, about 000.25% of the studio’s annual content. As a business, they’re smart to take that fraction of a percent to try and broaden their audience. Even if it only brings in a handful of new customers, the free publicity for them is nice, and best of all, seeing performers like this could open up some people’s minds and encourage them to be more tolerant and respectful of people who are different than them. Whether or not that is Men.com’s intent, visibility matters and this is ultimately a win-win for everyone. The great news for you, of course, is that you don’t ever have to watch the scene, and you can go about your life acting as if it never existed, if that’s what you want. It’s that easy!
Offline, many trans men have reported feeling more comfortable in lesbian spaces than in ones dominated by gay men.
But considering the fact that trans men are men, it’s time to reconsider welcoming them into gay spaces, and that means welcoming them into our bedroom fantasies as well.
Brian
This is stupid, even by Queerty standards. Trans porn is its own category. What’s wrong with that? Genitalia is a HUGE factor in porn, to act like we are supposed to just overlook the vagina in our gay porn is just as dumb as expecting straight men to start being fine with trans women with penises popping up in what’s being marketed as straight porn.
The world probably needs more trans men porn. But it doesn’t need to be part of gay porn, it can and should be its own thing.
UlfRaynor
100% agree with you.
Mindgeek, which owns Men, has for ages been trying to push women and now trans performers on their gay audiences, yet they do not try this on their str8 audiences.
Most of their gay porn is produced by str8 men, have the same sets and production crews that make their str8 porn.
To me, it’s the same as the str8 highschool bullies, who loved to constantly taunt the gay kids, except this time they get their jollies by constantly trying to shove vagina into our faces (literally and figuratively) through porn.
Donston
That’s what bugs me. I’m all about inclusion. But so many of these supposedly gay sites just seem to have no respect for homosexual/homo-leaning/homoromantic/gay men. And they mostly just perpetuate hetero/straight worship and gay shame. That’s why I depend on amateur stuff when I need a quick one.
wiredpup
Yup.
UlfRaynor
Donston, you and me both, I canceled my subscription to Men when they started a gay porn video off with Connor Maguire having oral and vaginal sex with a women with him staring into the camera with a smirky F U look in his eye’s, I also believe that that was the last gay scene he has done.
Catholicslutbox
I keep saying it all the time, Trans Porn is NOT GAY PORN!
Mindgeek wouldn’t pull this garbage on their straight site.
BCbreeze
Preach the truth!!!
Valentin
You do realize that gay trans men exist right? I don’t see the issue in representing trans men in porn when it’s directed at a demographic they happen to be a part of; you know, because they’re gay men and have sex with other gay men outside of your internet bubble… There are plenty of niche categories on gay porn sites, why is the addition of another category (out of hundreds) that big of a deal to you? Simply because it doesn’t get YOU off… Theoretically, you COULD cross cream-pies and trans guys out of your advanced search engine… You don’t HAVE to look into the categories you aren’t interested in, but I and many others sure will. I know it’s hard to believe, but the world doesn’t revolve around you.
Gay porn is for gay dudes, right?… Gay men who happen to be trans also happen to be part of that category (because they’re… wait for it… gay dudes, shocker!)… So isn’t it reasonable that some gay porn sites might want to represent other kinds of gay men in their videos (since it’s their website)? We’re just as much gay men in our daily lives as you are; We live a life like yours, fighting the same fight, beating the same meat… is the inclusion of gay men you’re not interested in really that much of an important issue to you? I sense that you’re complaining just to complain. Or you’re old.
Besides, trans women do show up on straight porn sites, under the trans category, they’re not an exception; if there’s a demand for something and a company who wants to provide it, it’ll happen. No need to take your emotional issues towards the free market out on trans people, all WE’RE doing is existing.
Personally, the only reason I bought a subscription and premium membership to Men.com, was solely to watch the Break and Enter Me video, as a trans guy, seeing that “man p*ssy” advertisement, it’s a strange but emotionally moving feeling I can’t accurately put into words. To have that kind of high quality representation of a body like mine on a porn site for gay men, it’s an affirming feeling as a man I have not truly felt yet through the media I consume. In a way, it makes me love myself a little more (like seeing a gay couple on TV or a black main character for the first time), rather than being cast away as some abnormal fetish for cis people to jeer at and forget about the next day, I feel slightly more seen in a society that I’m a part of and actively participate in.
Even if ‘Men’s inclusion of trans dudes was an attempt at grabbing my money… It sure as hell worked! I’m giddy and thankful for it anyways.
AgainNagain
When has it become acceptable to sexually assault a woman with no protection and then make it a fantasy in porn? All violent and dehumanizing porn which forces the actors to have unprotected sex needs to be banned.
RoughRugger
1) A trans man is not a woman.
2) Adult performers work condomless only with their consent & testing.
3) PLENTY of folks of all genders & orientations have fantasies & kinks that involve bondage scenes…AND THAT’S 100% OK & HEALTHY, provided everyone involved is consenting.
4) Porn is & always has been an outlet for people to explore different aspects of sexuality, particularly those that might be inaccessible or frowned upon in “polite” society.
Welcome to the 21st century.
UlfRaynor
In the video itself, according to str8upgayporn, this was a fantasy set up scenario by the trans performer.
mr guy
“But considering the fact that trans men are men”
No facts detected here
Crystix
Just like you are a “mister” or a “guy”. TROLL
Brian
What, are you saying men can’t have babies? Because obviously they can (now).
tumtum
Agreed and to the gender identity ideologue who argues that men can have babies, no men can’t have babies, a vagina and a womb are not male sexual reproductive organs.
Vaginas have no place in gay porn and being aroused by a vagina means you’re not gay. To argue otherwise is homophobic.
mr guy
If you truly believe in the “feminine penis” then have the courage of your woke convictions and promote the 38DD masculine B O O B..or do you really only believe in post-transition trans men are men? Remember it’s transphobic gatekeeping to insist on the necessity of gender dysphoria or any kind of surgical intervention..it’s enough simply to publicly identify as the gender you say you are
sfhairy
Because that’s a whole different genre of gay porn, duh. I’m not about to get turned on by Men with Pie.
Crystix
And I don’t get turned on by porn where the bottom is screaming “OH YEAH OH YEAH OH YEAH” constantly. That’s the magic of the internet, I move on to the next video when I see that and don’t feel the need to shame anyone who likes that or does it in real life.
Sam
Queerty it obviously gay man don’t like vagina. Your featuring a video of a person with a vagina getting rape. You gotta understand to RESPECT feminine anatomy parts. They’re not sex object. Do you learn anything from #metoo.
Donston
I actually do have some attractions to trans men and trans women. But it’s not comparable to “cis” porn. It’s just not. And the attractions I have towards trans men is very different than what I have towards cis guys. Most trans people are perfectly fine with being seen as trans people rather than being constantly compared to their cis counterparts. And from what I can tell gay porn is pushing the trans agenda hard. So, this article is merely surplus.
tumtum
There is no such thing as cis. Your gender isn’t assigned at birth, your biological sex is based on the observable biological indicators.
QueerTruth
AgainNAgain,
You have multiple porn site avatars/accounts under your name and old picture.
Nice try hypocrite. Worry about your own business.
AgainNagain
It’s one thing to say that you suspect whatever you are suspecting but you cross the line, Queer, when you falsely imagine that I have multiple porn accounts. The last time I was exposed to any porn, was many years ago. It disgusts me and makes me shake my head and it does nothing to spice up my imagination. I am excited that UK will begin verifying the age of all porn watchers soon (this summer I believe) with a valid credit card. That is what the US will and should do to protect the minors.
frankcar1965
Isn’t obvious that Queerty plants their shill in every conversation? Just ignore him/them and they will eventually stop it. And yes, it’s probably multiple people they pay to stir the pot and keep everyone going on.
QueerTruth
Nothing false. It was easy to search your existing profiles.
You’re just a pathetic hypocrite trolling this website. So a search was called for and the verdict is you’re a total sham and a hypocrite.
Whatever you gotta say is meaningless
smartguyd
Its a time issue at this point, all the gay grandpas have had lifelong issues with their sexuality and the fear of vaginas as the other. Unfortunately the majority of older generations only see female trans porn stars as a niche fetish category and have no real concept of any place for trans men in porn. The longer you live with rigid distinctions about gender, sexuality and personal identity the harder it is to overcome. The oldest millennial’s had access to internet porn early enough and were exposed enough to trans people and gender nonconforming people to be more open to trans performers in porn. And the younger you are the more likely you are to have dealt with your own issues early and not be so hung up on genitals when it comes to sex. To us trans people are just people that exist and sex is just sex.
sfhairy
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. oh wait, hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Brian
May I add, hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Heywood Jablowme
You sound like someone who’s seen a LOT of porn and not much (if any) real-life sex.
PinkoOfTheGange
Source for all these sociological claims?
UlfRaynor
You should take your comedy act on the road. I offer as evidence: was at a gay bar in Pittsburgh a little over a month ago, the bar was mostly comprised of twenty something gay men, in our group, one gay guy pulled up the video of Dante Colle performing oral sex on a trans male, the reverberating shrieks of “ewww that’s gross” that filled the room was all the proof I need of your inane generational observation.
Geeker
Is this the same studio that filmed the bi scene with Wesley Woods that triggered Wesley’s woke pansexual diatribe when gay guys dared to say they didn’t want to watch “gay porn” with women in it?
UlfRaynor
Wesley Woods has been expressing an interest in doing bi porn for a long time, he has stated so many times in podcast and youtube videos with his bisexual room mate Sylvia Paige.
loren_1955
Interesting comments. I, for one, find and consider a trans man a man and often far more handsome/beautiful than other men. And that may be the problem, trans men are real and gorgeous…jealous, maybe? I am a gay man and would date a trans man because he is a man.
AgainNagain
If you are truly attracted to trans men, you would not tolerate a film where they are sexually assaulted and abused, regardless whether it is a fantasy or not. What have you become, a sub-human? Where is your indignation?
Pendix
You must be Bi/pan then because Gay/homoSEXual men do not date trans men, stop with this anti-gay BS that gay/homos like vaginas!
tumtum
You’re not gay then. Gay people aren’t not aroused by vagina – ever.
Bisexual people are though.
frankcar1965
No trans for me, it is a turn off. I want a real man with real man DNA, no offense to trans but it’s not for me at all. And I really don’t care what anyone thinks.
Pendix
Amen, you’re just being naturally yourself (homoSEXual/gay) don’t let these extreme homophobic trans activists say otherwise!
Wolfie
There aren’t many in GAY adult video’s because Transmen do not have penis’ and that is the focal point of GAY porn.
NEXT
SumSay
Your logic is flawed. Most transwomen in trans porn have penises, and no one here would consider that to be gay porn. There’s more a to man than a penis.
mr guy
@SumSay And I suppose by your “logic” a porn video of two fully fursuited biological males going at it is not homosexual or gay porn.
But It IS. Just a bizarre sub-sub-subcategory the vast majority of gay men can’t understand or identify with and don’t want to watch
SumSay
@mr guy You supposed incorrectly of course. Of course your example is considered gay porn. The setting and the costumes don’t matter. There’s an exchange of sexuality between men who clearly know each other as men. Transwomen do not identify as men, despite having male genitalia, there’s a clear difference. If you don’t recognize gender, then of course you’d assume that anything involving penises and vaginas MUST be straight sex, but they’re sex organs and humans are much more complicated than that.
mr guy
Penises and vaginas, being the organs of generation, are the very quintessence of biological sex and therefore Human dimorphism…deal with it…whereas ”gender”, being amorphous and ill-defined, can be deployed to mean practically anything. I’ll stick with wonderfully COMPLEX Science and Reality over your simplistic faith-based dogma.
Shadowcat2576
@SumSay Almost all trans women in porn have penises because porn is produced primarily by and consumed by men. Men are sexually aroused by the image that trans porn provides, trans women with 30 inch waists 44 DD breasts and 8 inch rock hard penises that like to be used in all the ways penises in gay porn are used. In reality, most transgender women have no interest in sex like that, and their bodies won’t function like that. Let’s face it, the only reason trans porn is even a thing is because of the penis. If it wasn’t there would be lots of post op trans women with active porn careers.
Prax07
A trans man is Not a man, it’s a surgically altered Woman. Just because they have their tits cut off and have taken hormones does not make a female into a male. Putting them in Gay porn is just gross. As a Gay Man I’ll never find a vagina a turn on, and trying to force these freaks on to actual gay men in gay porn is just disgusting. Might as well say it’s a form of conversion therapy.
TomG
Until the have the clitoris expanded and testicles (fake tho they may be) they aren’t a transsexual by any means. They are women (or men) playing dress up.
ethan_hines
@Prax07 If you were going for the most disrespectful, transphobic award of this thread you won!
First you referred to a person as an “it”. Second you referred to a transperson as a “freak”. And last but not least you referred to Transmen appearing in gay porn as “conversation therepy” something that is forced on gay men , you are not being forced to take part in watching Trans men. Unlike children who have no choice.
Pendix
I fully agree with you.
TomG
A “transsexual” person is NOT truly trans unless they have had the surgery to the sex of what they transed to. Until then they are transvestites in my opinion.
PinkoOfTheGange
Honey look up the definition of “transition”.
Heywood Jablowme
“But considering the fact that trans men are men…”
Okay.
“…it’s time to reconsider welcoming them into gay spaces…”
Gay spaces? Okay, sure.
“…and that means welcoming them into our bedroom fantasies as well.”
Nope, that’s a non sequitur!
Donston
Talking about how “gross” something is or how much a trans man is not a “real man” just makes you look petty and hateful, especially to a pan-sexual who has overall same-sex romantic, sexual, affection, relationship preferences and ambitions like myself. On the other end, not seeing trans people as comparable to their “cis” counterparts doesn’t automatically make you a horrible or closed-minded person. It just means that you have a different perspective on gender and/or a different make-up to your orientation. Everybody is different. I am ultimately tired of everyone trying to dictate what “gay” and all these other identities means. And I’m all for expanding “gay” beyond the reigns of being a completely homosexual person in every way who is only willing to sexually engage with people of their cis gender. “Gay” needs to be expanded in this current environment. Otherwise, it won’t survive, and a great percentage of men who are not homosexual but have overall homo romantic, sexual, affection, emotional, relationship contentment and ambitions will continue to stay away from that word. And even many men who are completely homo in every way will continue to stay away from “gay” because they view it as something attached to “basic” and “un-hip”. In order for “gay” to thrive and be “cool” it does need to expand.
Nonetheless, I am tired of people telling gay-identifying men (especially gay-identifying men who are entirely homosexual) that they have to alter their instincts and desires and be more “open-minded”. You’re telling people to change themselves, and you’re shoving other people’s political agendas down their throats. It’s incredibly homophobic. And it’s something that “queer sites” like these should be ashamed of. No one is telling heterosexual men that they need to be into trans women and need to embrace them in the straight porn world.
This is clearly not about money. It’s about being “inclusive”. But trying to politicize porn is idiotic. The gay porn industry has so many straight/hetero-leaning performers who would rather be doing straight porn and don’t really respect gay dudes outside of getting money and ego boosts from them and maybe a hook up here and there. It has so many straight site owners and so many homosexual/homo-leaning/homoromantic/gay performers who contend with self-hate or straight/hetero worship. And it’s generally filled with manipulation, bitterness and mental illness. Anything the gay porn industry has to offer when it comes to politics and being “inclusive” almost always has a flip side of male homophobia attached to it. It’s hard to preach inclusiveness in an industry that clearly has issues unabashed cis male-cis male passions, preferences, affections, love, etc. The gay porn industry is way too problematic to be leaning on the straw-man argument of being “progressive”.
Doug
I’ve always been attracted to other guys, but I’m also finding more and more trans guys pretty hot. The clip for this on Men.com was no exception.
Donston
Everyone is different. I probably have more inherent attractions towards masculine women than I do trans dudes. But generally, I have attractions and arousals that are all over the place, and I’ve had sexual encounters with a variety of different types of people. However, I can only see myself having a persistent romantic, sexual, emotional contentment and general affections towards someone of my gender. In fact, I know this to be true about myself.
Trans men deserve a place in porn. The problem is trying to force them into gay porn and (the more problematic) shaming of men who are not into trans dudes at all. There are actually people who believe that you’re not an “authentic gay man” if you have no type of attractions to trans dudes. Absurd stuff like that helps no one’s cause. Furthermore, the gay porn industry has a long history of promoting hetero worship, internalized homophobia and gay inferiority. So, them hopping on the bandwagon of “progression” just reads as BS. It’s pretty much an industry mostly ran by straight people, non homo-leaning people, women, and self-hating or hetero worshiping faags. There’s no real progression to be found there. That is a (too often homophobic) guise. But at the end of the day people do need to remember that it’s just porn.
SumSay
@Donston
Transmen aren’t being forced into the idea of being showcased in gay porn. The producer is trying to add some variety to a stale market of having the same twinks and hunks doing the same sex positions and storylines featured every week. I don’t think this is going to be a continuous effort. The audience hates the idea which is understandable, but I think some are taking it much too far, ( I mean what’s with the vagina hate? What are you a 3rd grader afraid of catching cooties from seeing a vagina? ) Anyway, it is what it is. I don’t mind it and as far as I can tell, transmen are masculine enough to be considered men to me. It’s their gender, not their sex that matters right? Also, I like the idea of trying something new every once in awhile, but the majority don’t like things that are too different. They ultimately dictate the rules, so what can you do?
Also, men.com has NEVER claimed to feature cis men EXCLUSIVELY, so let that sink in for a minute.
Donston
It’s clearly more about agenda and press since these trans dude scenes often get an excessive amount of promo. And these performers seem obsessed with talking about how they’re “real men”. Furthermore, Men.com has a long history of doing things for the sake of shock value and/or attention. So, no, it’s hardly about “variety”.
Black Pegasus
These comments are interesting indeed lol
ethan_hines
I for one am glad to see transactors become more visabe in gay porn. For far too long we cis gay males have had an unhealthy dislike of vagina. I remember when I first came out asking what was so bad about vagina and most of my friends were like ewwww or worse yet they made rude allusions to fish. So of course I avoided vagina like the plague. But once I discovered transmen I was like hmmm I wonder. So I decided to hook up with a transguy and all of my preconceived notions disappeared. So for all of you cis gay men who just see a make a decision based of a person’s genitals, I implore you to be more open minded.
Donston
Many of the men you speak of probably have some amount of misogyny. However, your POV is incredibly problematic. Some people are simply turned off by vagina. Just like some people are simply turned off by penis. Some people love dick and/or man ass but are simply indifferent to pvssy rather than being grossed out by it. Many of the men who hook up with trans dudes don’t even genuinely consider them “men”. It’s more of a fetish than anything else. And even many of the men who have unabashed attractions and desires towards trans dudes still don’t have much romantic feelings, persistent affections and relationship ambitions towards them.
Ultimately, you can’t implore people to alter their sexuality for the sake of social politics and everyone “loving each other”. Let people have sex with whoever they please and date whoever they please and love whoever they please and identify as whatever they please. That’s genuine freedom. Telling folks that they are “closed-minded” because they are not interested in hooking up with a certain gender is homophobic and controlling. You need to get that. Perspectives like yours is why some men who are both entirely gay and entirely homosexual are starting to resent everything else a part of the “queer community”.
Paco
I’ve never been sexually attracted to women, but now I am supposed to be attracted to men with vaginas or I am just being closed minded? WTH?!!! Sorry but I am attracted to men and the genitals that are usually associated with men being equipped with.
Pendix
Just because you have straight sex (in reality, transmen are biological women [XX]) all the gays have to? No, the word homoSEXual exist for a reason right? And telling to gay/homo men to like vaginas is homophobic as hell, stop with that anti-gay shit!
Josh447
Donston,
Very well put.
tumtum
You’re not gay. Cis is not a term that I accept.
OzJosh
I wonder how long it’s going to take for trans guys/gals to realise that trying to convince everyone/anyone that they are “real” guys (with vaginas) or gals (with penises) is crazy and utterly doomed? If you really want to own being trans, then admit that you are in a category of your own, neither conventionally male nor female. You’ll get more respect, less hostility, and you’ll find it’s actually a genius marketing move. Better to deliver what is advertised on the label than invite everyone to go “eew, a vagina” (see above comments).
SumSay
I don’t think they’re trying to convince anyone of anything. They know who they are already, so you can take it or leave it. The producers try to and WANT to work with them, but the audience isn’t into it. It’s not their fault that most aren’t into what they have to give. Why should they have to change for us or any other production company just to make a buck? It’s not your position to tell someone what they should do to belong somewhere.
TheMarc
Sorry Charlie, no sale. You’re not transphobic if you’re gay and you’re not attracted to trans men. Just like you’re not misogynistic, etc. if you’re gay and not attracted to females. You’re gay because you are attracted to men. Sure, that takes on different levels for different gay men; some of whom are attracted to trans men as well. But again, if you’re gay and you’re not attracted to trans men; there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. This “fake woke” crap is getting out of hand, truly.
Donston
This sums up my perspective. If we’re going to truly embrace the romantic, sexual, emotional, affection, relationship spectrum then let’s truly embrace it. If we want to embrace everyone being different then let’s truly embrace that. Telling gay identifying men who are entirely homosexual that something is wrong with them if they’re not at all attracted to trans dudes is extremely hateful and doesn’t do anything to help anyone. And this comes from someone who has attractions that are all over the place. It just creates more bitterness and division. It’s funny how the media feels it has the right to shame gay identifying men for not having any attractions/passions towards trans dudes. But they don’t attempt to shame the straight identifying men who have no attractions towards trans people or even bi identifying who don’t have any attractions towards trans people. Just like they don’t like to shame men who are simply obsessed with certain body parts but don’t really have passions or relationship ambitions beyond one gender. It’s only gay identifying men who they feel they have a right to tell who they should be attracted to, have sex with, date. Can people not see how homophobic that is?
The “queer community” as a whole is starting to become a cesspool of hypocritical nonsense. The entirety is starting to be as shaming and controlling and driven by bitterness as a good deal of gay sociology is. There’s been so much deserved and undeserved criticism towards many gay identifying being controlling, being hateful, trying to force people to agree with them, trying to force “gay” into meaning being a homosexual in every way. Now, a lot of those controlling, shaming tendencies has spread out to everyone.
Will we ever get to a place of just being and letting other people be?
nitejonboy
I am not transphobic, I accept them and I have trans friends, but if I am watching gay porn I expect two dicks, not a dick and a vagina…this does not fly with me.
Josh447
Ditto
RexRed
Gay people are often more critical of other “genders” in our community than many straight people are.
If a gay guy is effeminate the straight acting men are the first to criticize with names like “Nancy”, “Mary” and/or “queen”. Why can’t we all just get along? Don’t be part of the problem. Your straight acting dick does not entitle you to be mean. The world is divided enough, there is bound to be blurred lines and just get over it.
So, if you do not prefer trans porn… don’t look at it, turn the page. If you expect others to get over the shock factor of two guys kissing you can at least try and get over the shock factor of seeing a, vagina.
We have toxic masculinity how about toxic gays? Sometimes it is best to just STFU if your opinion is simply nasty and hateful. You are no better than those who criticize you if you feel the need to insult others out of some sort of petty gender identification ego.
Pendix
If I wanted to see vagina I would see straight, bisexual or trans porn, but that’s GAY porn I want two [XY] people making sex! And sir you’re a very homophobic (as usual of these extreme trans activists).
DCguy
I don’t get all the controversy, the market will decide. If people like the scene it will make money, if they don’t it won’t.
Libertas Belle
“But considering the fact that trans men are men, it’s time to reconsider welcoming them into gay spaces, and that means welcoming them into our bedroom fantasies as well.”
Yes, trans men are men, and they are welcome in public spaces.
But, my fantasies are MINE. You can’t tell me I HAVE to fantasize about someone. I like the penis, and that’s what I’m going to fantasize about.
People that say you don’t have to watch, then turn around and say you’re phobic for not watching, are contradicting themselves. Yes, I don’t have to watch, but don’t try to make me feel guilty about not watching or fantasising about someone with a vagina.
Just because I don’t fantasize about women or trans men, doesn’t mean I don’t respect them.
I’m not going to say this content shouldn’t be available on gay sites, because there are men who do fantasize about trans men, and that is their right. You can’t control someone’s fantasises!
BCbreeze
Keep trans out of my gay porn please.
Pendix
No, just no. The vast majority of porn is already Penis + Vagina, Let the gay porn just be Gay (XY+XY).
Josh447
Vaginas are not for gay men. End of discussion.
justgeo
Porn is a niche industry. Not all ‘talents’ are equal. WTF is this about? Find new writers please!
Josh447
“But considering the fact that trans men are men (no they’re not, they are chemically altered women), it’s time to reconsider welcoming them into gay spaces (no penis not happening), and that means welcoming them into our bedroom fantasies as well.” (no penis no fantasy).
NEXT
STS
Now that this scene is out, the viewership and the ratings will tell the tale, the scene has a pretty low 44% rating and has been viewed about 28,000 times, it is not the absolute lowest rating on MEN but it’s down there near the bottom. The scene with Luke Hudson has been out for longer and has a 58% rating on 53,000+ views still quite a low rating from MEN subscribers. Of course ratings and views are probably a little skewed because many who don’t want to see trans performers will not ever watch these scenes nor rate them. It’s also possible that those who like trans men in their gay porn just don’t find Tommy Tanner as attractive or desirable as Luke Hudson. Or perhaps it’s the faux rape subject matter that is affecting the rating. Back to the point, both of these scenes and the scene with Silvia Saige (a bi scene with all CIS performers) have very low ratings (the scene with Silvia might be the lowest rated scene on MEN with a 32% rating on over 247,000 views. It seems these types of scenes are not resonating with the paying members of MEN, which reflects the overall tone of the comments here.
Bi porn is very easy to come by and really not needed or appreciated on MEN. True Trans porn is probably harder to come by especially Trans male porn, but it doesn’t seem like MEN is the best fit for this type of porn.
MEN releases a new scene everyday so some might say the occasional Trans male scene is no big deal, and I’d agree, but it might be best if these scenes were not part of the 7 new scenes a week and were instead a bonus scene (MEN could have an 8th scene some weeks that was always an “alternative” scene, not the typical mainstream gay stuff) The “8th” scene approach would ensure that their paying member always get 7 CIS Male gay scenes a week, (what they seem to want) and allow MEN to offer something for that subset of their members who are a little more adventurous.
Kake1977
I’m not the biggest consumer of porn, so I don’t really care if some porn studios are trying to earn a few extra coins by casting gay-identified transgender men in their films. Every major studio caters to some niche and fetish segment to broaden its customer base. However, it seems today we are being force-fed this transgender fetish as though it’s normal, and the line “transmen are men” is said again and again, even when it’s awkwardly shoehorned into a conversation.
Look, I really don’t care what someone wants to do to their body, especially if it makes them happy and fulfilled. If some females feel the need to take testosterone and have mastectomy’s to present as men in public, so be it. And some of them do manage to look like men, and if that makes them happy, great. But they are not males. A clitoris is not a penis, a neopenis is not a penis, silicone balls are not testicles, and labia are not a scrotum. And no amount of mental gymnastics will ever change the way I see this. No, some males don’t have a vagina, because a vagina is a female sex organ. However some men are indeed transgender men, therefore, they may also have a vagina.
And even though I have a more ridged perception of sex, gender, and sexual orientation, I understand not everyone does. Where as I see transmen more as masculine, queer people, pushing extreme gender boundaries using hormones, fashion, and even surgery rather then as homosexual or gay men, other people would disagree with me. And vagina isn’t a deal breaker for everyone; sexual orientation is much more fluid then once thought. Some men are fine with it, and some tops even prefer it. Even I am not turned off by it; though I’m still not sure I’m turned on by it? And if I reach the point I am turned on by it, that will really force me to reevaluate by own sexual orientation – it would mean I’m queer or pansexual I suppose; I may even be comfortable dating more masculine/tom-boyish females – which would make my mother ecstatic.
The future of gender and sexual orientation looks blurry at best, and these companies are going to capitalize on it. I suppose we should get used to it. But I think doing so will accelerate a social change that even people making the money aren’t prepared for. The day may come when the Christian advocates of reparative therapy are proven right, if all it takes for homosexual men to be aroused and attracted to people with vaginas is a female taking steroids, growing some chest hair, and emitting a musky oder.
JDean
why do I have watch ugly, mutilated women in my gay porn?