Of the seventeen New York Times staffers who have made (potentially unethical) political donations this season, the majority favor Barack Obama, who received $4,072. Hillary Clinton, who the paper endorsed, only received $500. [Petrelis Files]
Latest on Queerty
Troye Sivan posts picture of his daily PrEP and Metamucil regimen, says the combo “keeps him gay”
here we go again
Chris Christie “definitely thinking” about making another failed bid for the White House and the internet has thoughts
Missouri Republicans turn on gay colleague over his “disgusting” same-sex marriage ideas
Rosie O’Donnell just hinted about whether we can expect a reboot of her iconic talk show any time soon
This out Swedish singer is stealing hearts across the globe & when you see his Insta page you’ll get why
i don’t think it is “potentially unethical” for a reporter to make a political donation. I do think, though, that it is a potential conflict of interest. The conflict would come if the reporters making the donations, no matter who they are to, cover politics. If the reporters are on the sports or science or arts, etc. beats, then i don’t think (as a reporter myself) that it’s any big deal.
Comments are closed.