Okay, this is the last one for a while, but the intertubes has been clogged with fresh young twinks the last few days and well, you folks love them. We’ll give you maturity and hair soon, but here’s one last fresh face of youth to cheer up your day.
[Images]
We can't rely on mainstream media to tell our stories. That's why we don't lock Queerty articles behind a paywall. Will you support our mission with a contribution today?
Cancel anytime · Proudly LGBTQ+ owned and operated
Comments are closed.
petted
There’s just something about a guy when he’s a little dirty
getreal
This guy looks underage. I’m not a pedophile and I find it creepy when people are attracted to guys who look like children.
porsha
I have to agree with GETREAL. I’m not a pedophile either, and this kid looks too much like a kid. C’mon, Queerty, let’s move on!
tavdy79
@getreal: strictly speaking, paedophilia only applies to pre-pubescents; for pubescents the term is pederasty.
That said, if you look very closely at the third photo, you can see that his birthday is 26th Feb 1991 – which means he’s not yet 18. Naughty Queerty – you only had to wait three weeks!
porsha
OK. So, I’m not into pre-pubescents either. My desire is with MEN, and this kid is not yet one imo.
getreal
@tavdy79: Thanks for letting me know. I’m not a pederast and I like men that look like adults.
tallskin
I like the look of him. He’s really cute.
I especially find him being grubby and holding those chains horny!
I don’t think he looks underage at all. He is over 16 and able to decide with whom he wants to sleep.
getreal
@tallskin: Thanks for the rationalization (gee I wonder who is a MBLA member on this thread). Wait you hypocrite I thought you hated filthy pixies. LOL
tallskin
getreal, what is MBLA???
getreal
@tallskin:
Man boy love association
Dubwise
@getreal: I think you mean NAMBLA.
He is pretty…but he looks like he still smells like pee.
*waits for maturity and hair*
tallskin
Getreal, I find that slur unbelievably offensive
I expect you to apologise at once
getreal
@Dubwise: Thank you, yes NAMBLA. LOL To the fundamentalist I learned the slur from you and it never fails to crack me up.
tallskin
GETREAL YOU ARE A FUCKING SLIMY ARSEHOLE AND IF YOU WERE IN FRONT OF ME NOW I WOULD KNOCK YOU DOWN AND KICK SEVEN SHADES OF SHIT OUT OF YOU.
BUT I guess you reveal yourself in your true colours by your insult, because like all religious nutjobs you are not actually a very nice person, despite the veneer of Holierthanthou superciliousness.
My buddhist friends inform me that the point, for them, of being being buddhists, is that it helps them to become nicer and better people
What is your rationale for being a sky-pixie worshipper? Just so that it makes you an even creepier and slimier trail of anal mucus, along with the rest of your sexually repressed brethren?
getreal
@tallskin: Oh you funny fundamentalists. The only thing funnier than a christian fundamentalist is a an atheist fundamentalist. I think your post speaks for itself the person chasing 16 year olds, obsessed with imaginary wood creatures that live in the sky, and anal mucus is the nutjob. But we all appreciate your wacky rants you are such a comedian! Keep up the good work!
Dawster
You know GetReal, it could just be that you’re getting older and you can’t tell apart those that are clearly of age and those that are still pubescent.
don’t worry, it’s nothing to be ashamed of. younger guys can’t tell the difference between someone in their late 40’s and someone in their 60’s. the further away we are from something, the more it blends together.
so where as your opinion may make sense, there are those of us that differ. i do agree that anyone that sits and waits for someone to turn 18 is waiting for a technicality to give them permission to fuck someone. i find that quite disturbing (after all, an 18 year old is no mentally or physically different than a 17 year old.) BUT, that is not what is happening here – and you shouldn’t push it into that direction.
getreal
@Dawster: Well it is an interesting point but as someone who lives in west hollywood and is in their twenties I do share my neighborhood with a lot of guys just out barely 18 I have never personally understood the attraction but maybe when I am older I will feel differently.
Dawster
maybe… or you could be like every other anonymous poster….
to clarify: you were making it seem as if Queerty is posting pics of the guy with a dick in his mouth and cum dripping out of his ass.
it’s not. it’s Morning Goods. the guy is cute. he’s a model. you are right, there are some guys who may be jacking off over the “fresh face” of this guy, but the fact is that the guy is good looking.
sorry the fact that he’s cute offends you, but i’m not going to apologize for thinking he’s attractive, a great model, and he photographs well.
getreal
@Dawster: I never said anything about that I simply stated that I am not attracted to 17 boys (another poster commented that he is not yet 18) I have a right to my opinion just as you do yours and anyone who lives in weho knows what a barely legal guy looks like. I’m not interesting in having an argument it is silly. Enjoy the rest of your day.
Bob R
Good grief, this is a child. Where did you find him, Mark Foley’s Rolodex? Bring him back in about 5-10 years.
hardmannyc
MBLA is the graduate degree for pederasts.
Allen
Wow. If twinks looked like that … I’d be all over it!
Eric
Hot, but what’s with the unibrow in those last pics?
Michael W.
Usually I’m the first to speak up when I see people drooling over what appear to be children, but this guy just looks like a young adult to me.
I prefer my dudes a tad beefier but I wouldn’t yank my cock out of his mouth. I don’t like that Japhy so explicitly called this the “last one in a while,” though. Makes it sound like we got a round of old hairy men coming up (or worse).
Me
I find it interesting that (and not just on this post but in the past, too) Queerty readers seem to overwhelmingly prefer Men (with a capital “M”). And while they may quibble over details such as hirsute attributes, etc…, it’s definately a DILF crowd. Perhaps Queerty should run a poll and do some market research among its readership.
Chris
…….this is a little too Roman Polanski for me……….
Tim in SF
Wow! That’s the hottest photo set I’ve seen on Queerty. Ever. IMHO, of course.
He’s adorable now. He’s going to be super hot when he’s 25.
Thanks, Queerty, for the variety!
cruiser
He is kind of a cutie, but I sort of have a problem with the fact that he “looks a little too young” but that’s just me. That aside he is going to be a real hottie as he gets older with a face & a body like that all us “dirty old fags” are going to be in a world of hurt LOL.
Personally I don’t see what everyone’s issue is, the guy obviously is old enough to be in the business(modeling)so evidently he is at least 18(then again…)it’s not like any of us will ever get the chance/opportunity to meet the guy(unless by some strange twist of fate)so just sit back and enjoy the “fantasy” cause that’s what Morning Goods is all about anyway. Gotta Luv it!
Suburban
I think he looks way too young also but why do people have to resort to insults. Debate this in a mature way. I feel like I’m back in middle school…cmon.
Steven
Too cutey cute for me.
REAL dirty boy:
http://www.queerty.com/only-tough-guys-wear-mankinis-20090203/
;D
getreal
@cruiser: He is 17 a previous poster pointed out his birthday in one of the pics.
Michael W.
If he’s really 17 then shame on Japhy for posting these pictures.
Tim in SF
Thank you, Jaffy, for posting these photos. They’re modeling photos, meant to be shared and enjoyed.
Rob Moore
@tavdy79: Also hebephilial. He looks just fine as a 17 year old clothed model. It becomes both questionable and illegal if he is a 17 year old model posing in the nude.
tallskin
Fucking hell! You yanks are so browbeaten that you don’t seem to understand that across most of western europe the age of consent is 16, for straight and gays – in some countries it is even lower!
So, a european sees these pics thinks “Hmm, cute” and moves on, thinking nothing of it.
Witness the difference between the UK and US versions of queer as folk! In our version the boy was 15, and in the US version the boy was 17.
the effect of this on the minds of younger gays in the US must be to infantilise them! And for older american gays it must to create a state of fear that they’ll be called a ped.
I mean I have shown the comments above about this boy being too young etc etc to my friends here and they, like me, have just shaken their heads in disbelief!
You yanks have got to get your age of consent (and your heads) sorted out! A boy of 16 is more or less a man, and certainly able to decide whose cock, or not, he is going to suck or sit on.
dvlaries
SOMEDAY he will grow into a quite a handsome MAN, but he ain’t there yet. What is the problem? Why does it seem so damn difficult to find handsome guys circling 25 to 35…? So many queerty sets, regardless of the age, are so tame of crotch and ass shots, you’d think even average, good-looker straights on the NY streets would be lining up for an easy couple hundred.
Michael W.
@tallskin: No wonder the UK is so screwed up.
This is child pornography, plain and simple. I hope Japhy doesn’t start posting images of 15 year old boys next in order to quench Tallskin’s pedophilic thirst.
Nick
Michael W. has officially completely lost his mind. Child pornography? Pedophilia? Good god! Get real.
In other news, there were countdown clocks for the Olsen twins, that chick from Harry Potter and now, Miley Cyrus.
I feel no shame finding a 17 year old (three weeks from 18) attractive. Then again, I am only 22 but still.
Tim in SF
@Michael W.: This is child pornography, plain and simple.
Who made you the arbiter of all things pornographic? Wasn’t me.
If this is child pornography, than so is Boy Meets World, any show on the Disney Channel, and every high school yearbook ever produced.
Michael, you need stronger medication. Or a rescue from the Victorian age in which you apparently are stuck.
getreal
Micheal W has a right to his opinion and clearly a lot of people here share it. Some of us are uncomfortable with underage guys as sex symbols. It is not victorian or crazy. Whether it is Disney or another entity sexualizing children is creepy and 17 is not 21. A 17 year old is not yet an adult. I don’t think we need to shame each other for our differences of opinion.
Michael W.
How the fuck does somebody compare the show Boy Meets World to this? LMAO!! Talk about a false equivalence.
Yes, let’s all play innocent and pretend Morning Goods is here for us to gaze eloquently at the fleshy artwork of these fine gentlemen, not rub our boners as we fantasize about sexing whatever practically naked hunk or twink that’s featured here.
Tim in SF, while you may watch the Disney Channel to “admire” Cory Matthews’ pubescent beauty, the show was produced as a comedic sitcom for families. Perhaps you’d get the hint from the canned laughter if you ever took the TV off mute with your free hand, you sick bastard.
petted
Here’s a link to some shots with a dirty theme with a more mature model
http://www.beautifulmag.eu/beautiful/2008/11/dirty-boy-danie.html
A little more artsy
[img]http://www.beautifulmag.eu/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/2008/11/03/beauiful_kristopher_kelly1.jpg[/img]
but very nice shots in mho
tallskin
GETREAL
I cannot believe you shamelessly say: “I don’t think we need to shame each other for our differences of opinion.”
Excuse me!! Is this same wanker who called me a ped for saying the boy was cute right at the top??
You are such a hypocritical arse!
And you STATE: “A 17 year old is not yet an adult” in term of such certainty! Is this your sky pixie giving you the authority to state this?
So what if a 16 or 17 year old is not an adult – that is NOT the point! The point is whether a 16 or 17 year old is to be given the choice by a society of freely choosing his sexual partner or whether he will be criminalised for doing so.
Your attitude and those of many others on here, seems to be that he must be stopped from freely choosing who he wants to have sex with.
ScottsEver29
He’s a cute boy, but he is just that…a boy…too young, too soon, and looks like he is in 9th grade. However, in time he can grow into a nice looking man, I can definitely see it.
locatenate
Regardless of whether he’s underage or not, there’s no denying that he’s a good-looking kid. He reminds me a lot of River Phoenix…another amazingly talented actor that we lost way too soon.
Robert, NYC
@tallskin: @tallskin:
You raise a good point. Here in New York State where I live, a 16 year old can legally marry (with parental consent) and have sex, in some other states its illegal until 18. So I see a double standard when people decry a topless 17 year old single male in a sexy pose, he’s not exactly nude either? You wouldn’t hear many straight males objecting to a 16 year old girl in a semi nude pose now would we? The hypocrisy displayed here is mind-boggling, and no, I’m not into twinks nor do I condone pedophilia or pederasty.
Michael W….the UK is hardly screwed up. Its done a whole lot more than the U.S. on equality issues at the national level and it has NO DADT either. It has a bit more to do, but where exactly are WE? Even catholic adoption agencies in the UK aren’t allowed to bar gay couples from adopting children as an example. Its military publicly recruits for gay men and women to serve openly as well as run for public office. You call that screwed up? I think the shoe is on the other foot.
desertfan
There is no doubt this young man is extrememly good looking.
We all have different tastes in what we find attractive. My older brother would think nothing of making a comment about a mid-teens girl but if it’s a gay man making a comment about an almost (and now) 18-year-old guy it’s somehow pedophilia.
As already pointed out, pedophilia implies pre-pubescent. I could look at 15 or 16 year old and think he’s cute or handsome. That doesn’t mean I want to have sex with him, just pointing out his attractiveness.
Just because some of you strictly prefer a more mature looking man doesn’t mean the rest of us can’t appreciate a nice face and body without being ridiculed.
To each his own.