
A month after its release, Netflix’s Ryan Murphy-produced DAHMER – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story remains one of the most talked about television shows of the fall. And, in this case, that’s not necessarily a good thing.
Ever since the first trailer dropped, reactions to the true-crime series have been wildly mixed. With Murphy-verse regular Evan Peters starring as the infamous gay serial killer, DAHMER set out to tell this true-crime tale not as a can’t-look-away shocker, but framed as an indictment of the systems that allowed a murderer to run free for so long.
It wasn’t lost on the show’s creative team that Dahmer primarily targeted people of color, so they set out to center his victims’ stories—distinguishing it from the rest of Hollywood’s myriad portraits of the killer. But, no matter the good intentions, DAHMER only underscored the trauma that can be caused by attempting to re-litigate true crime through media. For many of the victims’ surviving family members, they saw their loved ones’ experiences being exploited for entertainment, bringing up distressing memories in the process.
Related: Here’s why viewers are calling Ryan Murphy’s Jeffrey Dahmer series exploitative and traumatizing
Now Dahmer’s own father, Lionel (played by Richard Jenkins in the series), has come forward to accuse Netflix of glamorizing his son’s crimes. As reported by the US Sun, the 86-year old’s caretaker shares that Lionel is courting legal advice on whether or not he should sue the streamer over Murphy’s scripted series, as well as the coinciding docuseries, Conversations With A Killer: The Jeffrey Dahmer Tapes.
The elder Dahmer claims to be unhappy he wasn’t contacted about either project, and that Netflix never asked for permission to use tape recordings from his son’s legal team in the documentary, in particular. He is also said to be a “nervous wreck” over the renewed attention on his son, with concerns that “deranged fans” may show up to his home. Though no such occurrences have been reported, he has allegedly placed “No Trespassing” signs around his property, and his caretaker has even made the decision to arm himself for protection.
Related: 20 years ago, an unknown Jeremy Renner dared to play gay serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer
“I’ve personally talked to a few lawyers and we’ve talked to his publisher about it too due to all the chaos that is going on and the stories we’ve seen,” says the anonymous caretaker.
Lionel previously penned a memoir, A Father’s Story, which shared his view of Jeffrey’s childhood, as well as the media storm surrounding his son’s arrest, trial, and conviction. It was published in 1994, only a few months before Jeffrey was beaten to death in prison by an inmate.
The caretaker—who says they’ve not watched the full series—believes it to be a pointless retelling, and one that casts Lionel in an unfair light: “He thinks that none of this should have been made, all the information that needs to be public is right there in his book.”
Meanwhile, DAHMER remains one Netflix’s top trending series (it was supplanted at #1 by Murphy’s other true-crime reimagining, The Watcher), and is said to be the platform’s second most popular English-language series yet, trailing only the most recent season of Stranger Things.
And, with Halloween fast approaching, the holiday only underscores concerns that the popular series is glamorizing the killer, turning his distinctive appearance into “iconography.” Look no further than eBay, which is one of many retailers that has had to formally ban the sale of costumes inspired by Dahmer.
Related: That’s a ‘You’ problem: 5 unsettling recent examples of hot actors playing serial killers
Per Buzzfeed News, eBay’s official policy prohibits sellers from “listing items that promote or glorify violence or are associated with violent individuals, the acts for which they gained notoriety, or crime scenes from the past 100 years.” But that hasn’t stopped online shoppers from searching for everything from wireframe glasses to orange jumpsuits to masks that specifically look like Peters’ characterization of Dahmer in the series.
For critics of DAHMER and other true-crime series like it, this is exactly what they were worried about. Many have taken to Twitter to speak out against dressing up as Jeffrey Dahmer this Halloween, including Olympic gold medalist Simone Biles. You can read the gymnast’s post below, along with other users who have some choice words for anyone considering the costume:
im just gon go head and say it, put the jeffrey dahmer costumes back in the closet. we ain’t having it!!!!!!
— Simone Biles (@Simone_Biles) October 19, 2022
#Halloween2022 TO ALL KIDS N MY AREA?IF YOU DRESS UP LIKE JEFFERY DAHMER U WILL NOT GET CANDY FROM MY HOME ? ANY OTHER COSTUME WILL BE SHOWERED WITH CANDY N BOOSIE CHIPS??I LOVE THE KIDS BUT ALL “LITTLE DAHMERS”PLEASE SKIP MY HOUSE #thanks
— Boosie BadAzz (@BOOSIEOFFICIAL) October 15, 2022
Jeffery Dahmer IS NOT A COSTUME. He’s not Michael Myers, he’s not Freddy Krueger, or Jason. Those are made up characters, he was a real monster! And the fact that people think it is hilarious to portray him as a funny or entertaining character is actually very sick. Seek help.
— lauren?? (@thelaurensmith_) October 21, 2022
The fuck is wrong with people? Why would you dress your kid up as Dahmer. Like did you not learn anything about the vile shit Dahmer did? No you cutified him via a kid’s costume because of a Ryan Murphy show. pic.twitter.com/MsoSHqO5Qk
— Cinematic PHD (@cinematicphd) October 21, 2022
It should be legal to kick every person in the shin who wears a Dahmer costume this Halloween
— Kirk Medas (@KirkMedas) October 15, 2022
LumpyPillows
I chose not to watch the show. That is about all you cancel culture nellies should also do.
So, Freddy Krugger Halloween is OK, but not Dahmer? WTF? People are nuts.
As far as his demented father looking to cash in by suing…that won’t happen and he’d lose anyway.
CatholicXXX
I love that you fail to see the difference between the two.
LumpyPillows
I love that you think the differences matter in a Halloween costume.
CatholicXXX
Atrocities aside, dahmer was a very attractive man.
wooly101
Personally I found the series facinating. I agree however that the villain in this was the police who acted so apathetic.
LAGuy
I agree it’s distasteful. But playing devil’s advocate…what about Jack the Ripper costumes? That was a real life event too. Or what about Titanic costumes? Tons of Black Dahlia costumes out there. Just saying. Maybe the more we talk about this, the more attention we draw to it which just makes it worse.
Diplomat
I’m truly not interested in soiling my brain with a cannibal serial killer true story drama. There are far better things to do so, with other more pleasurable formats.
bachy
I’m with you. Very resistant to watching any ‘entertainments’ about serial killers in general. Too much of current media generates a swamp of fear and mistrust which does nothing but incrementally deteriorate social cohesion.
For me, Ryan Murphy is to NETFLIX what Andy Cohen is to BRAVO. A huge, attention-starved, self-serving, money-grubbing Gay Azzhole.
cuteguy
I find it fascinating how m0rons cannot distinguish between fictional characters like Freddy Krueger and real life monsters like Dahmer. To dress up like a fictional character is one thing. But to idolize a real life monster, makes you sound like a MAGA loser
Ronbo
I agree that our media culture is broken; tv has 3,381 acts of violence a week! But you use the word “Idolize”. Did you even bother to watch the series? Perhaps being that you are so cute, you may have confused a mirror for your dictionary. Was the production slow with bouts of nose-picking?
To idolize someone is to treat them with extreme admiration and devotion. This production didn’t; it even touched upon the scabs who do, Pay attention instead of making false assertions.
Cuteguy is an example that there are different types of “m0rons”. I prefer the kind ones, not the hateful, devisive, derogatory, deceptive ones.
LumpyPillows
So, the person dressing up as the devil is a devil worshiper? How do your minds work? When did people get saw lost in their on minds that they become so toxically dumb.
LumpyPillows
so not saw – I was channeling my costume…
oh, and own not on…I’ve had too much coffee.
cuteguy
@Ronbo
Can you even comprehend basic English? Read again what I wrote or have some literate person read it and explain it to you. I criticized ppl who wore the Dahmer costume, NOT the show itself. And yes I did watch the series but once again for the “slow” ones like yourself, I NEVER CRITICIZED THE SHOW It’s funny how you yourself try to deceive by saying you prefer the “kind” ones instead of the hateful ones. And talk about deception. Look up the term gaslighting and then look in the mirror. You may need to change your handle on here.
dario717
I’ll give candy to a kid in a Dahmer costume before I give any to one dressed as Trump.
cuteguy
Ewww kids dressed up as that orange turd? Where do you live? Florida? Soon they will be dressing up as that other fat turd Ron Deathsantis
Paris in Santiago
Can’t watch Dahmer. Our community/area dealt with a serial killer before. It is a horrible reign of terror. Nope to Dahmer/Gacy clown costumes either.
cuteguy
It’s better to watch it now matter how triggering, especially if it can educate the lgbtq youth (and all of us really) to never let your guard down
bachy
Because INTO has no comments section, I just wanted to post here how much I absolutely adored Kaz Rowe’s YouTube video entitled, Bram Stoker and the Fears that Built Dracula. The video is embedded in the INTO article, Moving Beyond the ‘Bury Your Gays’ Trope: Reclaiming Queerness in Horror Films. Kaz presesnts a brilliant and fascinating look at the history of queerness and vampirism.
Ronbo
Queerty authors have the option to include comments – other sources like the editors at LGBTQ Nation changed and canceled all comments to prevent open discussion. Not allowing open disucssion is a red-flag denoting editorial propaganda and extremism.
I suspect that several authors here sockpuppet their articles to get the ball rolling in their direction. Review authors and you’ll see the same commenters heaping praise or attacking on-cue.
More speech is the cure – not censorship. Thank you Queerty!
bachy
Is that what’s going on? It seems to me that sites would get much more traffic if the viewership had a voice. Curious to know the difference in traffic between sites with comment sections and those without.
footwork61
I wonder if Eddie Redmayne will face the same backlash for portraying killer nurse Charles Cullen?
LumpyPillows
No one really cares about these whiners.