Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register

NOM Doesn’t Have A Real Crowd Of Supporters, So They Stole Obama’s


The National Organization for Marriage wants to make it seem like more people support repealing gay marriage in New Hampshire than actually do. So it PhotoShopped an image of a crowd at a 2008 Obama rally in Ohio onto their New Hampshire website. Rachel Maddow called shenanigans on her show last night and even the anti-marriage-equality Center for Marriage and Families called the move “unethical.”

Wow, you know you’ve stooped to a new low if your own cohorts are calling you out.


    • steve

      I just adore the ‘Defend Marriage’ part…

      Don’t they realize that marriage has become a mockery under heterosexual rule?

      Oct 26, 2011 at 9:56 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Michael

      LOL I never put anything past these bigoted fools and never will.This does not surprise me in the least.


      Wonderful point as well considering DIVORCE has always been a part of the heterosexual community especially when it pertains to MARRIAGE.So yes they did indeed make a mockery of that institution a long ass time ago and that never had anything to do with us the big bad scary GAYS lol

      If they want to protect marriage then they should really stop abusing each other DIVORCING each other CHEATING on each other etc…

      Oct 26, 2011 at 10:29 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • andreusz

      It’s okay to lie, if you’re lying for Jesus.

      Oct 26, 2011 at 10:41 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Joetx

      There are no limits to NOM’s lies.

      Oct 26, 2011 at 10:55 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Cam

      @andreusz: said…

      “It’s okay to lie, if you’re lying for Jesus.”

      Actually it’s funny you have that. The Mormon Church teaches that if you are lying to defend the church or Mormonism it is a good thing. They call it “Lying for the Lord”.

      Oct 26, 2011 at 12:49 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Khristiaan

      What’s the point on fighting for gay rights anymore it just ends up being taken away again anyways

      Oct 26, 2011 at 7:34 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Shannon1981

      disgusting. NOM must go. I really hope Anonymous makes them their next target.

      Oct 26, 2011 at 11:59 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Robert in NYC

      No. 7. I’d love it too if Anonymous could hack into NOM’s donor base and expose the bastards. NOM isn’t the only one doctoring coverage of its rallies. Glen Beck did the same thing in Washington DC last year. The one good thing Fox News did was to boot him from its channel.

      The only threat to marriage and the family are those heteros who philander, commit adultery, have countless numbers of children out of wedlock and divorce multiple times, something that has been going on since hetero marriage existed, hardly the fault of gays or same-sex marriage.

      Oct 27, 2011 at 8:50 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Robert in NYC

      Oh I forgot to mention in my prevous post. Polygamy is an hetero invention. It has existed as long as marriage has been around even beyond biblical times, but also condoned in the bible, hardly as a result of gays marrying.

      Oct 27, 2011 at 8:52 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Shannon1981

      @Robert in NYC: That’s the thing. They cannot see that heterosexuals have ALREADY MADE A MOCKERY OF MARRIAGE. Their countless adulterous affairs, multiple marriages and divorces, children strewn all over by who knows how many different babies’ mamas and daddies… Need I go on?

      These days, more than half of heterosexual marriages end in divorce. There is no “sanctity” to be had.

      As for NOM, I am not sure why Anonymous hasn’t targeted them yet. They seem to hate right wing propaganda- in fact, Fox News is their November 5th target.

      Oct 27, 2011 at 3:00 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • chris_clb614

      I had to do a double take, because I usally watch Rachel Maddow, but did not see this report til just now. Anyway, to the best of my knowledge, there are no tall buildings in New Hampshire. And as it turns out the double take I had was that I recognize those buildings, they’re in my hometown!

      In 30 years (tops) people will be wondering what the fuss was all about.

      Oct 28, 2011 at 4:33 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • lohen

      i kind of lol’d really hard :D

      Oct 29, 2011 at 6:53 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.

  • Copyright 2016 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.