Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register

PHOTOS: Yes, Emo Boy Baby Play Is A Real Thing

This image is from: PHOTOS: Yes, Emo Boy Baby Play Is A Real Thing · «Back to article

This image is from: PHOTOS: Yes, Emo Boy Baby Play Is A Real Thing · «Back to article

    • Chris

      I guess they wanted a more illustrative manifestation of their trudging about in a depressed, brooding state with their “no one understands me” mentality. What better way to do that than sitting in your own shit?

      Jan 18, 2013 at 4:01 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Ogre Magi

      This is all a big joke….right?

      Jan 18, 2013 at 6:32 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • 2eo

      @Ogre Magi: No, and just so you know that any complaint against them will result in them comparing their utter sad life choice to homosexuality and oppression.

      Which in itself is utterly offensive and demeaning to anyone who has ever suffered actual discrimination and oppression.

      Even though it isn’t valid they’ve not abandoned this rhetoric since those stupid furries and cat weirdo’s.

      Jan 18, 2013 at 6:55 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Kaz

      Yes, because this fetish is so much stranger or weirder than all the other ones at Folsom or IML or wherever… I’d rather see people enjoying themselves with their fetish then cutting themselves or thoughts of suicide.

      Jan 18, 2013 at 8:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Kieran

      Yeah baby! Where’s the nearest changing station?

      Jan 18, 2013 at 11:17 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • y4t

      As someone who has this fetish, along with many many others I can attest that it is no different than any other sexual fetish. Adult Baby and Diaper Lover are both fetishes which are not quite as rare as you may think nor is it “disgusting” or “weird”, words which are universally used to describe fetishes you’re not into. To you it may seem strange but to those who are into it it’s just as normal as any other type of sexual activity.

      Jan 19, 2013 at 4:21 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • 2eo

      @y4t: At least you avoided direct comparisons to the holocaust, which ranks you above the furries.

      Jan 19, 2013 at 4:39 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Caleb in SC

      I just . . . don’t . . . get it.

      Jan 19, 2013 at 10:58 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Kieran

      @Caleb in SC: You don’t have to “get it”. Just like a sexual infantilist doesn’t have to “get” why some men get off sexually wearing make-up and a bra and panties.

      Jan 19, 2013 at 12:35 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Aidan8

      Interesting thread…. I don’t get the diaper-infantalization thing, but I have my own kinks and sexual quirks. I don’t judge it or think it’s not genuine, but can we really say that the close intimate sexual communion of two people is equally expressed in all ways? Is it real genuine (dare I say “spiritual”) communion? Does my donning a diaper and sucking on a pacifier result in some higher level of connection with my “partner?” These are rhetorical questions….. I don’t know the answer but it’s worth asking. Perhaps “my kink” is just less “edgy”…. perhaps this is genuine connection for these folks. But I’ve got to at least ponder the issue…

      Jan 20, 2013 at 8:45 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.




    Copyright 2016 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.