Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register

Reasons To Sign A Prenup: Dr. Lara Embry Seeks $94K/Month In Divorce From Jane Lynch

Jane Lynch, Lara EmbryLooks like Jane Lynch’s marriage is becoming less Ellen Degeneres and more Cheyenne Jackson.

According to TMZ, divorce proceedings between Lynch and estranged wife Dr. Lara Embry have taken a turn into “unfriendly” territory now that Embry is seeking roughly $94,000 a month in spousal support.

Legal documents filed by Embry claim that her ex-wife’s “income, investments and assets increased dramatically with her newfound acting success,” and the multi-million dollar home she was previously awarded just won’t cut it anymore.

But what does Dr. Lara Embry need that much money for, you ask? Well, she spends nearly $6,500/month on clothes, $12,000/month on entertainment/vacations, and $4,500/month on “eating out.” During their time together, she claims Lynch paid for everything, a lifestyle she is now “accustomed” to.

Sources also tell TMZ that the couple did not have a prenup. Whoops!

On:           Sep 9, 2013
Tagged: , , , ,
    • Christopher

      Bitches Be Loco!

      Sep 9, 2013 at 5:24 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • GeriHew

      Who’s getting custody of the children?

      Sep 9, 2013 at 5:54 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Shadeaux

      She must pee cristal. These divorces are outrageous!

      Sep 9, 2013 at 5:55 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • yaoming

      @Shadeaux: I’ll drink to that.

      Sep 9, 2013 at 6:06 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Katbox

      @GeriHew: Obviously Jane Lynch. She pays for everything. Including the nanny.
      Lara Embry is such a leech. Her and her lawyers should be burned to a cinder.

      Sep 9, 2013 at 6:19 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • AnitaMann

      Dollars to donuts Ms. Lynch was advised to get a prenup but didn’t listen because she was in lurve. Jesus. Always, always get a prenup. It really makes things much easier if a break-up occurs.

      Sep 9, 2013 at 6:58 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Katbox

      @AnitaMann: That ex-porn star from million dollar listing new york, fredrik, didn’t sign one either.
      Such a moron.
      Fredrik is top a earner and has his own company in sweden. he’ll regret it.

      Sep 9, 2013 at 7:34 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • asby

      if we want all the rights that come with marriage…we should expect all the fun that comes with divorce……im sure jane lyches lawyers will come up with something saying there were really not married…..always get a prenup if u make more than your spouse…just common sense to protect what u bring into the marriage

      Sep 9, 2013 at 11:05 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • devinjgray

      Oopsie! Pesky isn’t it? Those RESPONSIBILITIES that come with RIGHTS. I adore Jane Lynch, but wow, this was foolish. I’m going to get married because my partner and I have been together 12 years. I told him that his escape clause was valid until we’d been together 10 years. We truly are blessed and blissfully happy, but I made it clear that after 10 years there will be no separation. Any problems will be worked through together. His only ticket out is a toe tag. A little dark humor, but still, he was fully informed from the start. Too bad two don’t take their vows as seriously.

      Sep 9, 2013 at 11:54 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Geoff B

      I hope this 94K a month demand gets laughed out of court. This woman is a doctor. Wether a PHd or MD she has employment opportunities that will give her a far better income than most people could dream of. Plus it’s not like they were married for decades. I guess she would be entitled to half of what Jane made the time they were married, but 6K a month for clothing? 12K for travel and entertainment? I spent 20 bucks tonight on a few beers after work and had a great time. You want almost 20 large a month for clothes and fun? Work for it your damn self.

      Sep 10, 2013 at 3:55 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • BJ McFrisky

      What’s that? A woman who believes her ex should keep her in caviar and champagne the rest of her life? Wow, that IS unbelievable.

      Sep 10, 2013 at 9:25 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • 1EqualityUSA

      Kind of greedy, Doc.

      Sep 10, 2013 at 1:24 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • GeriHew

      Is she bisexual?

      Sep 10, 2013 at 5:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • mulletkitty

      Even if she didn’t get a prenup, there’s no justification for putting a doctor on welfare so she can eat out.

      Go back to work, freeloader.

      Sep 11, 2013 at 10:26 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Ruhlmann

      Moral of the story is don’t get married.

      Sep 13, 2013 at 1:10 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.

  • Copyright 2016 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.