It’s official. Rick “frothy mix” Santorum is running for president, if only to change the search results associated with his name. Will Urban Outfitters openly sponsor his campaign? We don’t know, but his entry into the GOP presidential candidate pool all but ensures an election season full of LULZ because apart from his crappy last name, he’s also got two fake twitter accounts mocking his anti-gay politics. Let’s join in the laugh parade!
First there’s @RickSantorumPR, an enthusiastic and headstrong candidate who’s gleefully ignorant about his unfortunate name recognition:
Then there’s @FakeSantorum who is apparently pretty durned gay for a man who has co-produced seven babies:
You can also expect to have Santorum questioned on his anti-gay views throughout the GOP primary, which will force his competitors to admit whether they share his views om gay sex leading to man-on-dog action. Beastiality as a legitimate debate topic? Hells yeah.
How about we take this to the next level?
Our newsletter is like a refreshing cocktail (or mocktail) of LGBTQ+ entertainment and pop culture, served up with a side of eye-candy.
Lincoln and Douglas are probably looking up from their lecturns in hell and thinking, “Oooh, gurl. Just stop!”
High school image of Santorum via Truth Wins Out
TMikel
The ego and hubris of politicians never never fail to surprise me, but Santorum takes the prize! Apparently, he believes his own fictional rhetoric to the point where he believes all others will believe it too. Sorry, Ricky, but WHO you actually are speaks much louder than what you SAY you are.
dan4
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
NOW does Congressman WEINER’S dick get his own story on QUEERTY? Please? This story just keeps getting better and better and better.
http://biggovernment.com/
DM
http://www.spreadingsantorum.com
TommyOC
@dan4: BigGovernment is run by a lying, fraudulent tool. I would suggest Queerty readers not bother clicking your link. The man manipulates facts to conform to his damning view of progressives. (Remember the Obama bureaucrat forced to resign over a video where she admitted racial preference in the services she provided? Andrew Breitbart – BigGovernment’s lead writer – edited the video to take her statements waaaay out of context – a la Fox News. The original proved as much.)
The fact that the evidence presented on the site of the Weinergate story is unaltered does nothing to improve his image. It just confirms his absolute hatred of all things progressive – and of a congressman who, while personally flawed, is one of the best minds in Washington. (But he’s not a hypocrite… because he’s never run on “family values” like Republicans in similar disgraceful positions.)
dan4
TommyOC: Um, WEINER admitted it. Pelosi has called for an ethics investigation. And apologized to Breitbart!!! So you can suck it. Catch up, retard!
TommyOC
@dan4: You’re so cute. You make me want to squeeze the cheeks of every conservative and go “ooooooh, look at you, trying to be a big boy!”
Try reading the rest of my post before you open that maw you call a mouth again. I gave your right-wing hatefest of a website the credit for posting accurate information *this time.* Of course, none of this detracts from Andrew Breitbart’s reason for being: Feeding its followers a regular helping of rotten, festering hate and bile.
I intended to go into why Pelosi is calling for an ethics probe – which, it may come to shock you, has nothing to do with the sort of subjective “ethics” you probably think it does – but my bland truth would be repulsed by a brain so accustomed to the retched taste of one-sided, unpatriotic, hate-mongering. I fear what would happen to your worldview – nay, your health – if you were forced to think critically for once.
Have a splendid day.
dan4
TommyOC: You’re so cute spewing those DNC talking points about Breitbart being a liar. “He’s right this time.” That’s TOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO FUNNY. Wrong – but funny!
WEINER, please meet ACORN and Sherrod. You’re not OUT OF BUSINESS!
And TommyOC: You are FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCKED!
Jeffree
@dan4: I’ve been hoping for a long time that a well-read, articulate, thoughtful conservative would join the ranks of commenters here on Queerty. We need some balance.
Ideally, such a person would understand the historical & regional forces shaping the Republican party, and be well-versed on economic AND social issues.
So, if you meet someone like that, please send him/her our way. The quality of the debate suffers when histrionics on both sides take the place of actual conversations.
dan4
Jeffree: Conservatives will now return your hate and vitriol with hate and vitriol. As Bill Maher would say: NEW RULE!
When leftist cunts attack me, I’ll attack back. Bring it, fucker! (Instead of hiding it in some of your useless, faux-cloying and INEFFECTIVE code.)
Meanwhile: Queerty waited almost a fucking week to cover this story. And the reactionary leftist cunts on this site attacked EVERY ONE OF US for asking how much longer it would take before they waded in to this HUGE story. So you’ll forgive me for not giving a rat’s ass what you think of my TONE! ASSHOLE!
p.s. Congressman Weiner is, apparently, an online sexual predator. (According to 3 of the 6 women he admits to romancing via Twitter, email, and Facebook.) It’s HILARIOUS that the fuckers on this site and elsewhere spent so much time and energy defending him and calling us (and Andrew Breitbart) liars!
Jeffree
So, an honest question of mine was met with a histrionic reply? No malice or vitriol or spin was intended on my part.
I hoped you would step up to the plate, bring on your best, because I think we need an OPEN DISCUSSION of the best ideas.
I’m sure you have people you look up to. I want them here. Our discussions get derailed by lack of thought, lack of reason, lack of civility. On both / all sides.
I’m sick & tired [as I thought you were] of people who repeat the same shinola over & over again, regardless of party affiliation.
Are you or are you not willing to engage in a rational discussion? Do you want to drag the debate down into “talking points” and “name calling” or do you want it to be a forum for honest conversation?
A simple yes or no will suffice.
dan4
Jeffree, I’m not a fan of the liberal version of civility: Liberals can say and do anything, and conservatives have to take it. And when WE fight back, WE are the problem.
After reading this site for a few years, I’ve noticed that the leftists here are hateful and vitriolic cunts. Since I started posting last week, I’ve (as other thoughtful conservatives have for YEARS, I’m sure) been attacked without abandon. I’m MORE than happy to attack back! If you have a problem with the tone of the discourse, maybe you should head to the NPR page. I understand they’re quite happy with thought police in their organization.
Is THAT clear, retard? I hope my TONE didn’t offend you……..
Jeffree
@Dan4: When you’ve found someone who can speak about Conservatism more intelligently than you, I hope you’ll encourage them to post here. Otherwise, your own inability to engage in rational discussion will drag down the level of debate to HAHAHAHAs and WAAAAH.
Step up to the plate. You can do better.