The Supreme Court posted the oral arguments from today’s hearing of Hollingsworth v. Perry, which will determine whether California’s Proposition 8 is constitutional.
We can't rely on mainstream media to tell our stories. That's why we don't lock Queerty articles behind a paywall. Will you support our mission with a contribution today?
Whew. Just listened to the whole thing. Verrilli was just dreadful: stuttering, bumbling, and hinting at the states’ rights refrain that even Obama has abandoned. I have no idea how he became Solicitor General.
Cooper was similarly lame, but he didn’t have much material to work with. Olson, on the other hand, was nothing short of a rockstar.
I would remind jwrappaport that Donal Verrilli was similarly slammed for supposedly dooming Obamacare by his poor oral argument…and then won a slam dunk. He may not have the rhetorical flashiness of Ted Olson, but he gets the job done.
And Wilberforce, they’re supposed to interrupt them constantly. Oral argument is their only opportunity to actually engage with the legal arguments of the plaintiffs and defendants and question them about it. If they wanted to listen to dry legal arguments they’d read the submitted briefs and amici.
@Freddie27: I would remind you that the outcome of a case has no necessary relationship with the performance of counsel. Verilli bungled the Obamacare case, but carried the day because Roberts was skittish about involving the Court in such a heated political issue. Just read the decision – Roberts upheld it as a tax and didn’t buy a single one of the government’s Commerce Clause arguments.
Verilli just isn’t that strong a speaker and lacks the confidence of an Olson or Paul Clement. He stutters and is easily and frequently flustered. In the words of the great Roman orator and statesman, Marcus Tullius Cicero, “that don’t impress me much – no, no, no, no.”
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
jwrappaport
Whew. Just listened to the whole thing. Verrilli was just dreadful: stuttering, bumbling, and hinting at the states’ rights refrain that even Obama has abandoned. I have no idea how he became Solicitor General.
Cooper was similarly lame, but he didn’t have much material to work with. Olson, on the other hand, was nothing short of a rockstar.
Wilberforce
Man those justices have zero manners, interrupting the speaker constantly.
Freddie27
I would remind jwrappaport that Donal Verrilli was similarly slammed for supposedly dooming Obamacare by his poor oral argument…and then won a slam dunk. He may not have the rhetorical flashiness of Ted Olson, but he gets the job done.
And Wilberforce, they’re supposed to interrupt them constantly. Oral argument is their only opportunity to actually engage with the legal arguments of the plaintiffs and defendants and question them about it. If they wanted to listen to dry legal arguments they’d read the submitted briefs and amici.
jwrappaport
@Freddie27: I would remind you that the outcome of a case has no necessary relationship with the performance of counsel. Verilli bungled the Obamacare case, but carried the day because Roberts was skittish about involving the Court in such a heated political issue. Just read the decision – Roberts upheld it as a tax and didn’t buy a single one of the government’s Commerce Clause arguments.
Verilli just isn’t that strong a speaker and lacks the confidence of an Olson or Paul Clement. He stutters and is easily and frequently flustered. In the words of the great Roman orator and statesman, Marcus Tullius Cicero, “that don’t impress me much – no, no, no, no.”