Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register

Students At Emory Want Chick-Fil-A To Get The Cluck Off Campus

This image is from: Students At Emory Want Chick-Fil-A To Get The Cluck Off Campus · «Back to article

This image is from: Students At Emory Want Chick-Fil-A To Get The Cluck Off Campus · «Back to article

    • Cam

      Countdown to all the “Fake Gays” to come on here and claim that gays are evil bullies and bigots are just our poor helpless victims.

      Oct 9, 2012 at 10:08 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • MK Ultra

      A campus is a place for learning and education.
      Kinda the opposite of Shit fill A’s atmosphere of ” duh, me a kris-chan”
      I mean, didn’t shit fil A ‘s top clucker drop the pearl of wisdom last week, saying he supports “biblical families”, clearly not knowing what that means or hoping his dumbass customers don’t.
      I say, good for these students.
      Hopefully it will prompt Cathy to open his mouth more. The more that man talks, the better it is for us.

      Oct 9, 2012 at 12:30 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Avenger

      Just don’t eat there if you have a problem with what they do.

      Oct 9, 2012 at 2:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • GreatGatsby2011

      I suppose it may not be a popular opinion, but I personally believe there’s a fine line between saying “I find your spending practices to be reprehensible. I will therefore not be supporting your business with my hard earned dollars and telling everyone I know who cares about me as a person about your spending policies so they will not unwittingly support ideologies in which they don’t believe. I will also be spreading awareness of your spending policies so that even people who don’t know or care about me as a person are fully aware of what their money is supporting when they patronize your establishment.” and saying “You and your kind aren’t welcome around here.” And it’s a line I won’t cross. I wouldn’t categorize crossing that line as “unethical” (I don’t believe I have the moral authority to determine what is or is not ethical) just personally distasteful and not in line with my personal ideologies.

      So there have my less-than-popular opinion. Feel free to dissent.

      Oct 9, 2012 at 2:21 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • 2eo

      Democracy. When the bigots campaign for marriage equality it is democratic.

      When people stand up and say “get stuffed” it is evil gay muslim house prices obamacare socialist fascist lesbian taxgremlins.

      Oct 9, 2012 at 2:41 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Cam


      At what point would you not cross that line? If the KKK was going to open a store on your campus would you let the campus know you did not feel comfortable with them having a business there?

      If a group that advocated rape victims must marry their rapists opened a store would you support them?

      Remember, Chik Fil Et was supporting groups that were instrumental in supporting the bill in Uganda that would have legalized killing somebody for being gay. Emory is a private school and these kids are paying a LOT of money to go there.

      Oct 9, 2012 at 2:43 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • EngiNerd


      Discrimination is just wrong. There is no ethical, logical, or legal argument for justifying discrimination. Chick-fil-a is providing money to discriminatory organizations thus the company is discriminating. No one should be able to argue otherwise. It’s the company’s social responsibility to ensure that its money is going towards just or legitimate causes. They have crossed the line and something should be done about.

      That being said I think everyone should have the right to their own opinion. Those who do not support marriage equality are not inherently discriminating. Those who actively try to diminish the rights of the LGBT community are!

      I don’t think Emory being a private school justifies the right of students to remove companies off campus. Private schools just have different rules. Emory has a very diverse culture (all encompassing) and aims to maintain that diversity. Emory also aims to ensure the happiness and success of all students regardless of their culture. When a particular culture/idea is targeted, repressed, etc. students, employees, and administration at Emory mobilize and act because they know they can and that they have the support of the Emory community to voice their opinion.

      Oct 9, 2012 at 3:08 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • GreatGatsby2011

      @Cam: I would never cross that line, as stated above. If a member of the KKK wanted to open a business, and they chose to use the money made by said business to fund organizations in line with their philosophy, then I would choose not to patronize that establishment and I would raise awareness so that others would boycott the business as well. But I certainly would not tell the KKK member that they couldn’t open a business because the business owner would choose to spend the profit in line with his/her ideology, no matter how reprehensible I find that ideology to be.

      Same goes with your other example.

      Oct 9, 2012 at 3:31 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • hyhybt

      “Contractual obligation” is probably a key phrase to remember. Breaking a contract is expensive. Not wanting to do so doesn’t mean they won’t go with someone else when it runs out.

      Oct 9, 2012 at 5:06 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • erasure25

      @GreatGatsby2011: Why is this confusing to you. The students are doing exactly what you are saying. The student leaders, who by the way are elected student body representatives, are telling the Administration they don’t want their money, their tuition dollars, to support CFA, which supports known hate groups. They are exercising their rights to not financially support CFA with their money.

      Why do you seem to focus so much on the rights of CFA but refuse to give those same rights to the students?

      Oct 9, 2012 at 7:04 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • JOHN 1957

      For goodness sake will someone kill that chicken already! Yes the company should be removed if and when it insights hate towards any given group of people. It’s a thin line between freedom of speech and defamation that could incite violence towards any particular person(s), then it becomes a hate crime. This I know because I’ve taken neighbors to a public hearing with a mediator for calling my partner and myself faggots and having others join them in the neighborhood. I will not be bullied and heaven help anybody who would try to hurt my spouse though he was 6 ft 2 and was in the Air Force, I’m a native New Yorker and I would have to duct tape a grenade to their front door if anything happened to him because of their bigotry and this I said in front of a lawyer. It’s strange how we can let things slide off our back when it’s said about us, but when it comes to a loved one we can become worst than a rabid grisly bear in less that a second. These anti-gay and hate organizations should devout their time and money to helping the hungry, the sick, the homeless and the list can go on and on for miles. Talk about using God’s name in vain.

      We can’t reason with these hate groups, we can’t speak with them intelligently and they’re not willing to even try. Their obsessed and possessed with doing harm and destroying lives. They start with one group of people then go to another and then another, for different reasons in their twisted sick little heads they are the chosen ones, for what dam if we know. It’s time the tables turn on them.

      Oct 9, 2012 at 7:17 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • GreatGatsby2011

      @erasure25: Actually no. It’s not the same thing at all. If the students don’t want their tuition dollars going to CFA, they should go to a school that does not have a CFA on campus. Giving someone your money and then saying “Okay I’ve given you my money so now you have to run the school the way I tell you to” is in no way “boycotting” so I have no idea how you could even draw that parallel. The moment you give your money to the college it becomes their money to do with as they see fit. If you don’t like the way they are spending the money you give to them, don’t give them any more money.

      And I care about every

      Oct 9, 2012 at 7:36 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • GreatGatsby2011

      Stupid enter button. I care about the rights of all humans, not just those who agree with me. I’m aware that that viewpoint isn’t very popular amongst some people which is why I started my comment the way I did.

      Oct 9, 2012 at 7:48 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • EngiNerd


      I think that’s rather oversimplification of the issue. For one, a prospective student should not have to choose to not go to a school based on which fast food chains are offered or analogous offerings/opportunities. Emory, like many good universities, have Chick-fil-a’s on their campuses. That’s like saying I don’t want to go to school in Atlanta because it’s a southern city.

      Two, the school has a contract with Sodexho to provide food services throughout campus. Sodexho subcontracts out to Chick-fil-A. Emory does not have that much power, if any, over the subcontract, which is why students and Emory are asking Sodexho to not renew its contract with Chick-fil-A.

      Third, the university also serves the students so how money is used by the University is impart controlled by the students. There’s obvious control like how student government delegate funding for student organizations and events, and theirs also less formal means. Additionally, administration and employees have similar feelings towards Chick-fil-A. This is an issue that surpasses the student community and affects the entire Emory community.

      Oct 9, 2012 at 9:11 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Cam


      So according to you it is mandatory that Emory University, a private university must acccept every business even though their students may not like it.

      I’m sorry, but that is anti-Capitalist. The students are Emory’s customers, if they demand that a business leave, it is Emory’s deciscion. Additionally, as a college, having a business owned by say “The KKK” is akin to Emory advocating their position.

      All of that can harm their primary business, which is students.

      Oct 10, 2012 at 9:43 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • NotStr8Acting

      @GreatGatsby2011: Part of me believes you’re trying to play devil’s advocate just for the sake of playing devil’s advocate. You’re obsession to “play fair” and be nuetral, is actually quite clearly picking a side without you realizing it. Allowing a company that donates funds to the MURDERS of gays abroad is not exactly promoting a “fair” point of view. There’s some things that go beyond law, and go to ethics. You want a free for all. That regardless of how reprehensible the actions and financial funding of a company may be, they should all exist. A poster above brought up a great point you overlooked. Would you also be in favor of an establishment that takes a pecentage of it’s funds and donates it to groups that promote rape of women abroad? …
      how is that any different/worse than a company that is on record for donating funds to groups that have facilitated other groups whom seek to murder gays abroad?
      You want us to overlook that, and just pretend to be a little less passionate about our gay brothers & sisters elsewhere. Sorry, no. YOU have every right to not care, or care as much, or even care at all. You can’t dictate how much others can & should care about the HUMAN rights of an entire demographic. These college kids care a lot. And thank goodness people like them exist.

      Oct 10, 2012 at 12:25 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.




    Copyright 2016 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.